BACKGROUND: Integrated community case management (iCCM) is a programme that can, via community health workers (CHWs), increase access to timely and essential treatments for children. As well as improving treatment coverage, iCCM has an additional equity-focus with the aim of targeting underserved populations. To assess the success of iCCM programmes it is important that we understand the contribution they are making to equitable health coverage. METHODS: We analysed demographic and health survey data from 21 countries over 9 years to assess evidence and evaluate iCCM programmes. We summarise the contribution CHWs are making relative to other health care provider groups and what treatment combinations CHWs are commonly prescribing. We assessed the ability of CHWs to target treatment delays and health inequities by evaluating time to treatment following fever onset and relationships between CHWs and wealth, rurality and remoteness. RESULTS: There was good evidence that CHWs are being successfully targeted to improve inequities in health care coverage. There is a larger contribution of CHWs in areas with higher poverty, rurality and remoteness. In six surveys CHWs were associated with significantly shorter average time between fever onset and advice or treatment seeking, whilst in one they were associated with significantly longer times. In areas with active CHW programmes, the contribution of CHWs relative to other health care provider groups varied between 11% to 45% of treatment visits. The distribution of types of treatment provided by CHWs was also very variable between countries. CONCLUSIONS: The success of an iCCM programme depends not only on increasing treatment coverage but addressing inequities in access to timely health care. Whilst much work is still needed to attain universal health care targets, and despite incomplete data, there is evidence that iCCM is successfully addressing treatment delays and targeting underserved populations.
BACKGROUND: Integrated community case management (iCCM) is a programme that can, via community health workers (CHWs), increase access to timely and essential treatments for children. As well as improving treatment coverage, iCCM has an additional equity-focus with the aim of targeting underserved populations. To assess the success of iCCM programmes it is important that we understand the contribution they are making to equitable health coverage. METHODS: We analysed demographic and health survey data from 21 countries over 9 years to assess evidence and evaluate iCCM programmes. We summarise the contribution CHWs are making relative to other health care provider groups and what treatment combinations CHWs are commonly prescribing. We assessed the ability of CHWs to target treatment delays and health inequities by evaluating time to treatment following fever onset and relationships between CHWs and wealth, rurality and remoteness. RESULTS: There was good evidence that CHWs are being successfully targeted to improve inequities in health care coverage. There is a larger contribution of CHWs in areas with higher poverty, rurality and remoteness. In six surveys CHWs were associated with significantly shorter average time between fever onset and advice or treatment seeking, whilst in one they were associated with significantly longer times. In areas with active CHW programmes, the contribution of CHWs relative to other health care provider groups varied between 11% to 45% of treatment visits. The distribution of types of treatment provided by CHWs was also very variable between countries. CONCLUSIONS: The success of an iCCM programme depends not only on increasing treatment coverage but addressing inequities in access to timely health care. Whilst much work is still needed to attain universal health care targets, and despite incomplete data, there is evidence that iCCM is successfully addressing treatment delays and targeting underserved populations.
Authors: D J Weiss; A Nelson; H S Gibson; W Temperley; S Peedell; A Lieber; M Hancher; E Poyart; S Belchior; N Fullman; B Mappin; U Dalrymple; J Rozier; T C D Lucas; R E Howes; L S Tusting; S Y Kang; E Cameron; D Bisanzio; K E Battle; S Bhatt; P W Gething Journal: Nature Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Abdullah Al-Taiar; Shabbar Jaffar; Ali Assabri; Molham Al-Habori; Ahmed Azazy; Arwa Al-Gabri; Mohammed Al-Ganadi; Bothaina Attal; Christopher J M Whitty Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Andria Mousa; Abdullah Al-Taiar; Nicholas M Anstey; Cyril Badaut; Bridget E Barber; Quique Bassat; Joseph D Challenger; Aubrey J Cunnington; Dibyadyuti Datta; Chris Drakeley; Azra C Ghani; Victor R Gordeuk; Matthew J Grigg; Pierre Hugo; Chandy C John; Alfredo Mayor; Florence Migot-Nabias; Robert O Opoka; Geoffrey Pasvol; Claire Rees; Hugh Reyburn; Eleanor M Riley; Binal N Shah; Antonio Sitoe; Colin J Sutherland; Philip E Thuma; Stefan A Unger; Firmine Viwami; Michael Walther; Christopher J M Whitty; Timothy William; Lucy C Okell Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 11.069