| Literature DB >> 33790932 |
Deepak Kothari1,2, Meenakshi Thakur1,2, Robin Joshi3, Amit Kumar4, Rakesh Kumar1,2.
Abstract
Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is an expensive spice crop cultivated successfully in Iran, Afghanistan, India, Greece, Morocco, Spain, and Italy. The present study was conducted during the periods 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 to evaluate the morphological, yield and quality parameters of saffron in six different regions of non-traditional areas of the western Himalayas. The two experimental factors were "year" and "location." The experiment was conducted using a factorial randomized block design with three replications. Yield attributes, viz., number of flowers, fresh flower yield, fresh stigma yield and dry stigma yield were significantly higher in location L3 compared to other geographical locations. Dry stigma yield in location L3 was higher by 50.0, 41.2, 33.3, 14.3, and 9.1% compared to locations L6, L5, L1, L4, and L2, respectively. These were characterized by the appropriate climatic conditions, viz., high altitude, sandy-loam texture of the soil, optimum temperature, lesser relative humidity and total rainfall, demonstrating that it is possible to cultivate this spice even in non-traditional areas of the western Himalaya. Positive correlations were established for stigma yield with increased altitude and lesser rainfall. Secondary metabolites viz., crocin and picrocrocin increased significantly with the increase in altitude; however, a reverse trend was recorded for safranal content. Total phenolics and flavonoids were significantly higher in the geographical location of Kinnaur, H.P. (L1) and Bharmour, H.P. (L4). In conclusion, the assessment of different geographical locations and soil types is particularly necessary to encourage saffron production and its qualitative traits. Based on current findings, saffron can be grown successfully in some non-traditional locations of the western Himalayan regions.Entities:
Keywords: crocin; locations; picrocrocin; safranal; soil
Year: 2021 PMID: 33790932 PMCID: PMC8005729 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.657819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Identification of different locations through the MAXENT model.
Location, geographical and climatic characteristics of the study area of saffron crop.
| L1 | Moorang | Kinnaur | Himachal Pradesh | 31°36′10″ | 78°27′04″ | 2,591 | 20.9 | 8.5 | 998.9 | 49.6 |
| L2 | Kapkote | Bageshwar | Uttarakhand | 30°05′05′ | 79°53′58″ | 2,400 | 23.9 | 8.6 | 1,223.8 | 60.6 |
| L3 | Suppa, Bharmour | Chamba | Himachal Pradesh | 32°26′47″ | 76°34′14″ | 2,195 | 28.2 | 16.5 | 742.7 | 38.3 |
| L4 | Sathli, Bharmour | Chamba | Himachal Pradesh | 32°26′47″ | 76°34′14″ | 2,019 | 27.5 | 17.1 | 1,195.3 | 42.7 |
| L5 | Langha, Palampur | Kangra | Himachal Pradesh | 32°07′49″ | 76°33′54″ | 1,565 | 26.2 | 15.7 | 2,254.8 | 46.2 |
| L6 | CSIR-IHBT Palampur | Kangra | Himachal Pradesh | 32°06′29″ | 76°33′35″ | 1,472 | 27.8 | 17.7 | 2,193.1 | 46.8 |
Variation in soil physicochemical properties at different altitudinal locations.
| L1 | 5.2 ± 0.2 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 269.4 ± 0.2 | 17.0 ± 0.5 | 887.5 ± 0.3 | 44.3 ± 0.4 | 32.2 ± 0.4 | 23.5 ± 0.2 | Sandy loam |
| L2 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 313.8 ± 0.3 | 13.9 ± 0.7 | 640.8 ± 0.5 | 51.1 ± 0.4 | 34.5 ± 0.5 | 14.4 ± 0.1 | Sandy loam |
| L3 | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.9 ± 0.6 | 448.4 ± 0.3 | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 856.3 ± 0.2 | 44.8 ± 0.6 | 31.7 ± 0.2 | 23.5 ± 0.4 | Sandy loam |
| L4 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 0.30 ± 0.25 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 283.5 ± 0.2 | 16.4 ± 0.3 | 439.3 ± 0.7 | 56.1 ± 0.2 | 30.5 ± 0.4 | 13.4 ± 0.2 | Sandy loam |
| L5 | 5.3 ± 0.3 | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 167.7 ± 0.4 | 16.8 ± 0.3 | 246.5 ± 0.3 | 48.9 ± 0.2 | 30.5 ± 0.2 | 20.6 ± 0.4 | Sandy loam |
| L6 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 150.6 ± 0.1 | 19.9 ± 0.4 | 229.4 ± 0.4 | 45.9 ± 0.1 | 32.5 ± 0.9 | 21.6 ± 0.3 | Sandy clay loam |
Different altitudinal locations affect growth, yield and yield attributes of saffron.
| Y1 | 26.20b | 87.84b | 9.67b | 1.88b | 19.66b | 28.81b |
| Y2 | 28.86a | 100.71a | 11.05a | 2.06a | 40.38a | 32.13a |
| L1 | 25.43d | 85.26d | 9.51d | 1.80d | 13.16de | 30.30d |
| L2 | 31.28b | 117.53a | 12.45ab | 2.21b | 28.16b | 33.01c |
| L3 | 32.85a | 111.6b | 12.51a | 2.40a | 42.83a | 36.65ab |
| L4 | 29.88c | 68.35f | 11.80abc | 2.11bc | 19.33c | 28.65e |
| L5 | 24.21e | 100.95c | 9.50de | 1.72de | 13.00def | 37.73a |
| L6 | 21.53f | 81.98e | 6.40f | 1.61ef | 13.66d | 16.50f |
FIGURE 2Regression equation between independent variable, (A) altitude (m), (B) total rainfall and dependent variables, i.e., fresh stigma yield (kg/ha) and dry stigma yield (kg/ha). Altitude and rainfall are represented in the primary X-axis. Fresh stigma yield and dry stigma yield are presented in the primary Y-axis and secondary Y-axis, respectively.
FIGURE 3Correlation matrix between dependent and independent variables. ∗ and ∗∗indicate that the corresponding values are significant at P = 0.05 and P = 0.01, respectively.
FIGURE 4Chromatogram of marker compounds of saffron in different environmental locations.
FIGURE 5The multivariate analysis of the mean value of independent variables, viz., altitude and total rainfall and secondary metabolites were conducted through principal component analysis. PC-1 and PC-2 jointly explained the variations of 74.5% (A–E). (A) represent variables of loading plot PC-1, (B) variables of loading plot PC-2, (C) variables presented as vectors in the space of the PCA, (D) loading scores of the treatments with PC-1 and PC-2, and (E) represent eigenvalue.
Cluster variability in secondary metabolites of saffron affected by altitudinal locations.
| 1 | Crocin | 25.1–48.8 | 41.0–52.5 | 53.6–57.8 |
| 2 | Picrocrocin | 18.8–22.8 | 34.6–36.5 | 25.6–26.1 |
| 3 | Safranal | 2.4–3.8 | 3.4 | 0.8–2.5 |
| 4 | Total phenolics | 5.4–5.9 | 6.3–7.1 | 6.5–7.0 |
| 5 | Total flavonoids | 4.5–5.1 | 5.1–5.5 | 3.4–5.2 |