Literature DB >> 33790523

Video Laryngoscopy-guided Nasal Intubation: One More Bullet in Our Rifle.

Alessio Cittadini1, Federica Marsigli1, Andrea Sica1, Domenico P Santonastaso1, Emanuele Russo1, Emiliano Gamberini1, Vanni Agnoletti1.   

Abstract

How to cite this article: Cittadini A, Marsigli F, Sica A, Santonastaso DP, Russo E, Gamberini E, et al. Video Laryngoscopy-guided Nasal Intubation: One More Bullet in Our Rifle. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(3):351.
Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Critical care; Fiberoptic bronchoscopy; ICU; Intubation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33790523      PMCID: PMC7991772          DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0972-5229


To the Editor, We appreciate the attention that the authors have addressed to the paper “Nasal intubation: A comprehensive review”,[1] demonstrating how nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is a historically established, effective, and safe technique despite being underused in the current practice. In our intensive care unit (ICU), a multidisciplinary unit with 17 beds, both trauma and neuro-ICU, we routinely perform NTI for long-term ventilation to reduce patients’ discomfort, and our gold standard is to perform NTI through flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy guidance. In any case, we deem the approach under the video laryngoscope guide can offer several advantages. NTI under video laryngoscope guidance is easier to perform also for less experienced users while mastering fiberoptic intubation requires a longer learning curve.[2] Video laryngoscope also appears to be safe for awake intubation and can achieve overall and first-attempt success rates comparable to fiberoptic bronchoscopy.[2] Thanks to the avoidance of hyperextension of the neck, this technique is to be preferred in particular patients, such as spine trauma or in cases where the mouth opening is significantly reduced for anatomical reasons or injuries resulting from the trauma. A comparison of the hemodynamic response between the two procedures is not well studied but evidence seems to favor video laryngoscopy.[3] Moreover, we should stress how fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedures have the potential of bioaerosolization associated with patient coughing, sneezing, or talking, or during the use of suction. Therefore, endotracheal intubation, extubation, connection, and disconnection of the ventilatory circuit in patients infected with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may cause aerosolization that may contaminate personal protective equipment, exposed body parts, or even the airway of the person handling the patient's airway.[4] Video laryngoscopy is ideally recommended in patients infected with COVID-19 to increase the distance between the operator's and the patient's face to minimize the contamination risk. Finally, it is remarkable how, despite the importance of the success rate or safety of tracheal intubation in the critically ill patient, this area is still scarcely explored.[5] We believe video laryngoscopy-guided NTI is as affordable and safe as other NTI techniques in selected settings, so we kindly invite the authors to include this in their review.
  5 in total

1.  Videolaryngoscopy vs. fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Alhomary; E Ramadan; E Curran; S R Walsh
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  A comparison between the GlideScope® classic and GlideScope® direct video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Florian Heuer; Sören Heitmann; Thomas A Crozier; Annalen Bleckmann; Michael Quintel; Sebastian G Russo
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.452

Review 3.  Personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 pandemic - a narrative review.

Authors:  T M Cook
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 4.  Nasal intubation: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Varun Chauhan; Gaurav Acharya
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-11

5.  Correction to: Tracheal intubation in critically ill patients: a comprehensive systematic review of randomized trials.

Authors:  Luca Cabrini; Giovanni Landoni; Martina Baiardo Redaelli; Omar Saleh; Carmine D Votta; Evgeny Fominskiy; Alessandro Putzu; Cézar Daniel Snak de Souza; Massimo Antonelli; Rinaldo Bellomo; Paolo Pelosi; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.