| Literature DB >> 33790332 |
Mirta Sibilia1, Chiaramaria Stani2, Lara Gigli3, Simone Pollastri3, Alessandro Migliori1, Francesco D'Amico3, Chiara Schmid4, Sabina Licen5, Matteo Crosera5, Gianpiero Adami5, Pierluigi Barbieri5, Jasper R Plaisier3, Giuliana Aquilanti3, Lisa Vaccari3, Stefano Buson6, Federica Gonzato7.
Abstract
A multi-instrumental approach combining highly sensitive Synchrotron Radiation-based techniques was used to provide information on the real composition of a dry black ink powder found in a bronze inkwell of the first century AD. The presence of Pb, Cu and Fe in the powder, revealed by XRF and ICP-OES data, leads to raise several hypotheses on their origin. The inkpot and its lid were also investigated by Hand-Held XRF, revealing a bronze alloy (Cu-Sn) with a certain amount of Fe and Pb. The lid was found to be particularly enriched in lead. XRPD, XAS and FTIR measurements showed a substantial presence of silicates and common clay minerals in the ink along with cerussite and malachite, Pb and Cu bearing-carbonates, respectively. These evidences support the hypothesis of an important contamination of the ink sample by the burial environment (soil) and the presence of degradation products of the bronze inkpot. The combined use of IR, Raman, and GC-MS evidenced that the black ink is mainly composed of amorphous carbon deriving from the combustion of organic material mixed with a natural binding agent, Arabic gum.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33790332 PMCID: PMC8012642 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86288-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) the inkpot; (b) the inkwell bronze decoration; (c) an internal view of the inkwell with the black powder on the bottom; and a top view of the lid: traces of silver agemina are clearly visible; (d) the black powder with colored particles.
Summary of the ink composition, as revealed by the different methods applied for the analysis, and attribution of the specific constituents to original ink composition, corrosion products and soil contamination.
| Phase | Formula | Method | Attribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amorphous carbon | C | RAMAN, GC–MS | INK |
| Arabic gum | Polysaccharides + Glycoproteins | IR, GC–MS | INK |
| Cerussite | PbCO3 | XAS, XRPD, IR | Corrosion product/soil contamination |
| Malachite | Cu2(OH)2CO3 | XRPD, IR, SEM | Corrosion product/soil contamination |
| Fe and Cr Oxides (possibly as Chromite) | Fe2+Cr2O4 | SEM | Corrosion product |
| Anglesite | PbSO4 | XAS | Degradation product/soil contamination |
| Quartz | SiO2 | XRPD, IR | Soil contamination |
| Albite | NaAlSi3O8 | XRPD, IR | Soil contamination |
| Illite | (K,H3O)(Al,Mg,Fe)2 (Si,Al)4O10 | XRPD, IR | Soil contamination |
| Oligoclase | (Na,Ca)(Si,Al)4O8 | IR | Soil contamination |
Percentages of the main metals revealed both in the inkwell and ink powder by HHXRF, ICP-OES, SR-XRF, SR-XRPD.
| Cu (%) | Sn (%) | Pb (%) | Fe (%) | Ca (%) | As (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HHXRF | Lid | 49.6 (2) | 28.6 (2) | 13.4 (1) | 2.7 (1) | – | – |
| Inkwell | 69.4 (3) | 20.7 (1) | 2.0 (1) | 3.9 (1) | – | – | |
| ICP–OES | Ink | 15.0* | ND | 3.5* | 2.1* | – | – |
| SR-XRF | Ink | 11.90 (2) | 0.20 (3) | 2.81 (9) | 1.18 (8) | 0.48 (5) | 0.41 (5) |
| SR-XRPD | Ink | 10.7 (2) | ND | 3.2 (3) | ND | – | – |
*RDS < 5%.
Figure 2(a) SR-XRF average spectrum of the ink sample (experimental: empty blue circle) and its fit obtained with PyMca (red curve); (b) Normalized spectra of the ink sample and all the collected XAS data of reference compounds. The cerussite (PbCO3) spectrum is taken from Baker et al[22].
Trace elements (in ppm) revealed by ICP – MS in the ink powder.
| Mn | As | Zn | Ba | V | Sr | Ni | Cr | Co | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICP-MS Traces elements (ppm) | 301 | 257 | 200 | 137 | 80.7 | 69.1 | 19.0 | 15.2 | 5.45 |
Figure 3(a,b) Infrared spectra of several ink samples and possible reference spectra from the database (Kimmel Center for Archaeological Science Infrared Standards Library, https://www.weizmann.ac.il/kimmel-arch/infrared-spectra-library); (c) XRPD Rietveld refinement profile fit of the ink sample: black crosses are the experimental data, in red the calculated pattern. The residuals are displayed on the bottom in blue and the reflection ticks of each phase with the colours reported in the legend.
Figure 4(a) Infrared spectrum of an ink sample and possible reference spectra from the database (Kimmel Center for Archaeological Science Infrared Standards Library, https://www.weizmann.ac.il/kimmel-arch/infrared-spectra-library); (b) Raman spectra collected by 532 nm and 266 nm laser, respectively; (c) chromatogram: the main peaks are indicated by numbers and reported in Table 4. Black numbers indicate combustion products, green numbers indicate vegetable origin compounds, orange numbers indicate compounds of both vegetable and/or animal origin.
List of organic compounds identified by GC–MS analysis (Peak number refers to labels in Fig. 4c).
| Peak n° | Retention time (min.) | Compound | CAS | Identification | Class | Attribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15,5761 | Phenanthrene | 85-01-8 | MS, RT | PAH | Biomass combustion |
| 2 | 16,4813 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 112-39-0 | MS, RT | Fatty acid (as methyl ester derivative) | Vegetable matrix |
| 3 | 16,5102 | Anthracene, 2-methyl- | 613-12-7 | MS, Lee | PAH | Biomass combustion |
| 4 | 16,6932 | Phenenthrene, 1-methyl | 832-69-9 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 5 | 17,0159 | Naphthalene, 2-phenyl- | 612-94-2 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 6 | 17,5311 | Quinoline, 6-phenyl- | 612-95-3 | MS, Lee | Heterocyclic aromatic (origin: coal tar) | |
| 7 | 17,6804 | Fluoranthene | 206-44-0 | MS, RT | PAH | Biomass combustion |
| 8 | 17,8489 | Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 112-61-8 | MS, RT | Fatty acid (as methyl ester derivative) | Vegetable matrix |
| 9 | 18,0511 | Pyrene | 129-00-0 | MS, RT | PAH | Biomass combustion |
| 10 | 18,5856 | Phenanthrene, 1-methyl-7-(1-methylethyl)- | 483-65-8 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 11 | 18,7975 | Pyrene, 1-methyl- | 2381-21-7 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 12 | 19,4668 | 11H-Benzo[a]fluoren-11-one | 479-79-8 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 13 | 19,6498 | 7H-Benzo(c)fluoren-7-one | 6051-98-5 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 14 | 20,0495 | Benzo(a)anthracene | 56-55-3 | MS, RT | PAH | |
| 15 | 20,1025 | Chrysene | 218-01-9 | MS, RT | PAH | |
| 16 | 20,1795 | Benzo[a]pyrene, 4,5-dihydro- | 057,652-66-1 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 17 | 20,714 | Benz[a]anthracene, 1-methyl- | 2498-77-3 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 18 | 20,767 | Benz(A)anthracene-7,12-dione | 2498-66-0 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 19 | 21,0559 | 2,2′-Binaphthalene | 612-78-2 | MS, Lee | PAH | |
| 20 | 21,7637 | Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 205-99-2 | MS, RT | PAH | |
| 21 | 21,8071 | Benzo(k)fluoranthene | 207-08-9 | MS, RT | PAH | |
| 22 | 22,173 | n-Nonacosane | 630-03-5 | MS, RT | Long chain n-alkane | Vegetable matrix |
| 23 | 22,2453 | Benzo[e]pyrene | 192-97-2 | MS, RT | PAH | Biomass combustion |
| 24 | 22,3416 | Benzo(a)pyrene | 50-32-8 | MS, RT | PAH | |
| 25 | 22,8279 | n-Triacontane | 638-68-6 | MS, RT | Long chain n-alkane | Animal/ vegetable origin—contamination |
| 26 | 23,6658 | n-Hentriacontane | 630-04-6 | MS, RT | long chain n-alkane | Vegetable matrix/ Arabic Gum |
| 27 | 24,6192 | n-Dotriacontane | 544-85-4 | MS, RT | long chain n-alkane | Animal/ vegetable origin—contamination |
| 28 | 24,8696 | Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene | 193-39-5 | MS, RT | PAH | Biomass combustion |
| 29 | 25,5919 | Benzo[ghi]perylene | 191-24-2 | MS, RT | PAH |