| Literature DB >> 33789661 |
Cyrille Armel N Njanpa1, Steven Collins N Wouamba2, Lauve Rachel T Yamthe1,3, Darline Dize1, Brice Mariscal T Tchatat1, Patrick Valère F Tsouh4, Michel Nguiam Pouofo5, Jean Bosco Jouda6, Bruno Lenta Ndjakou2, Norbert Sewald7, Simeon Fogue Kouam8, Fabrice Fekam Boyom9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plants represent an intricate and innovative source for the discovery of novel therapeutic remedies for the management of infectious diseases. The current study aimed at discovering new inhibitors of Leishmania spp., using anti-leishmanial activity-guided investigation approach of extracts from Diospyros gracilescens Gürke (1911) (Ebenaceae), targeting the extracellular (promastigotes) and intracellular (amastigotes) forms of Leishmania donovani.Entities:
Keywords: 1-deoxyinositol; Antileishmanial; Cytotoxicity; Diospyros gracilescens; Ebenaceae; Hexane fraction; Isolated compounds
Year: 2021 PMID: 33789661 PMCID: PMC8011081 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-021-03279-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Fig. 1Fractionation procedure of the crude extract from the trunk of D. gracilescens. The crude extract suspended in water was sequentially partitioned using organic solvents
FT-MS product ions of detected compounds in the trunk extract of D. gracilescens
| N° | RT (min) | [M + H]+ | UV, λmax (nm) | molecular formula | Name of compound | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. | Calcd. | |||||
| 1 | 7.19 | 663.4740 | 663.4772 | 222 | C46H62O3 | Chlorobiumquinone |
| 2 | 6.99 | 431.3689 | 431.3672 | 222 | C32H46 | NI |
| 3 | 6.82 | 483.3621 | 483.3621 | 450 | C30H46O | NI |
| 4 | 6.77 | 427.3946 | 427.3946 | 222 | C30H50O | Lupeol |
| 5 | 6.65 | 469.3465 | 469.3421 | 222 | C32H46O | NI |
| 6 | 6.57 | 479.3887 | 479.3884 | 222 | C33H50O2 | NI |
| 7 | 6.21 | 391.3003 | 391.2995 | 222 | C28H38O | NI |
| 8 | 5.13 | 579.3116 | 579.3105 | 218 | C38H42O5 | NI |
NI Not Identified
Fig. 2HPLC profiles of the crude extract and fractions from the trunk of D. gracilescens (TIC: m/z 150–1000). a crude extract; b Dichloromethane fraction; c Hexane fraction
Anti-leishmanial activity of D. gracilescens crude extracts against promastigotes of L. donovani
| Plant | Part | Solvent | Promastigote of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Root | H20: EtOH | > 100 | |
| Stem bark | H20: EtOH | > 100 | |
| Leaf | H20: EtOH | > 100 | |
| Trunk | H20: EtOH | 5.84 ± 0.20 | |
| Positive control | Amphotericin B | 0.34 ± 0.22 | |
Activity data are expressed as mean ± Standard deviation (SD) from triplicate experiments; IC50: 50% Inhibitory Concentration
Anti-leishmanial activity and selectivity Indexes of fractions from the trunk crude extract against promastigotes and amastigotes of L. donovani
| Extract/ fraction | IC50 (Promastigotes) (μg/ml ± SD) | IC50 (Amastigotes) (μg/ml) ± SD | Raw267.4 CC50 (μg/ml ± SD) | SI (Promastigotes) | SI (Amastigotes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trunk crude extract | 5.84 ± 0.20f | 35.69 ± 0.26f | > 100 | > 18.56 | > 2.80 |
| Hexane fraction (A) | 0.79 ± 0.09b | 8.06 ± 0.39b | > 100 | > 126.74 | > 12.40 |
| Dichloromethane fraction (B) | 1.63 ± 0.11d | 10.97 ± 0.11c | > 100 | > 61.16 | > 9.11 |
| Ethyl-acetate fraction (C) | 2.36 ± 0.06e | 16.05 ± 0.12d | > 100 | > 42.30 | > 6.23 |
| n-butanol fraction (D) | 1.11 ± 0.10c | 22.08 ± 0.09e | > 100 | > 89.60 | > 4.53 |
| Water residue (E) | > 100 | – | – | – | – |
| Positive control | 0.34 ± 0.22a | 0.12 ± 0.11a | / | / | / |
Activity data are mean ± Standard deviation (SD) from triplicate experiments; IC50: 50% Inhibitory Concentration; CC50: 50% Cytotoxic Concentration; SI: Selectivity Index. Along each column, IC50 values with the same letter superscripts are not significantly different, Bonferroni test (p > 0.05)
Fig. 3Isolated compounds from D. gracilescens. Structures of the isolated compounds were elucidated by means of physical and spectroscopic methods
Anti-leishmanial activity and selectivity indexes of isolated compounds against L. donovani promastigotes and amastigotes
| Compound | IC50 | IC50 | Raw267.4 CC50 | SI (Promastigotes) | SI (Amastigotes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lupeol (1) from fraction A | 23.22 ± 0.08 | 46.66 ± 0.65 | 19.28 ± 0.3 | 0.82 | 0.41 |
| Betulin (2) from fraction B | NT | NT | ND | ND | ND |
| Betulinic acid (3) from fraction B | 13.69 ± 0.07 | 18.46 ± 0.01 | 82.39 ± 0.09 | 6.02 | 4.46 |
| Mixture of sterols (4) from fraction A | 46.83 ± 0.20 | 17.83 ± 0.17 | 18.26 ± 0.18 | 0.39 | 1.02 |
| β-sitosterol glucoside (6) from fraction D | 49.34 ± 0.12 | 32 ± 0.22 | 28.60 ± 0.07 | 0.58 | 0.89 |
| 1-deoxyinositol (7) from fraction D | 241.71 ± 0.16 | 120 ± 0.18 | > 1218 ± 0.13 | > 5.04 | > 10.15 |
| Amphotericin B | 0.37 ± 0.22 | 0.13 ± 0.11 | / | / |
Activity data are expressed as mean ± Standard deviation (SD) from triplicate experiments; IC50: 50% Inhibitory Concentration, ND: Non-Determined; NT: Non-Tested (Betulin not tested due to insufficient quantity)
Fig. 4Kill kinetics of L. donovani promastigotes in relation to drug concentration and time. Cells were treated with different concentrations of (a) hexane fraction and (b) amphotericin B. The growth kinetic curves were plotted as number of viable parasites vs time with data collected every 24 h over a period of 120 h; NC = Negative control; Each data point represents mean ± SD from three experiments