Literature DB >> 33789487

Factors influencing periprosthetic femoral fracture risk.

Tobias Konow1, Johanna Baetz1, Oliver Melsheimer2, Alexander Grimberg2,3, Michael Morlock1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) are a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are becoming an increasingly common indication for revision arthroplasty with the ageing population. This study aimed to identify potential risk factors for PPF based on an analysis of registry data.
METHODS: Cases recorded with PPF as the primary indication for revision arthroplasty in the German Arthroplasty Registry (Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD)), as well as those classified as having a PPF according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in patients' insurance records were identified from the complete datasets of 249,639 registered primary hip arthroplasties in the EPRD and included in the analysis.
RESULTS: The incidence of PPFs was higher (24.6%; 1,483) than reported in EPRD annual reports listing PPF as the main reason for revision (10.9%; 654). The majority of fractures occurred intraoperatively and were directly related to the implantation process. Patients who were elderly, female, or had comorbidities were at higher risk of PPFs (p < 0.001). German hospitals with a surgical volume of < 300 primary procedures per year had a higher rate of PPFs (p < 0.001). The use of cemented and collared prostheses had a lower fracture risk PPF compared to uncemented and collarless components, respectively (both p < 0.001). Collared prostheses reduced the risk of PPF irrespective of the fixation method and hospital's surgical volume.
CONCLUSION: The high proportion of intraoperative fractures emphasises the need to improve surgeon training and surgical technique. Registry data should be interpreted with caution because of potential differences in coding standards between institutions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):650-658.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collar; Comorbidity; EPRD; Periprosthetic fracture; Registry; Risk factor; Surgical experience

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33789487     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1046.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

Review 1.  Total hip arthroplasty compared to bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced hip fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Mira Trivellas; Jörg Eschweiler; Frank Hildebrand; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options.

Authors:  H Fischer; T Maleitzke; C Eder; S Ahmad; U Stöckle; K F Braun
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.175

3.  Low annual hospital volume of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not associated with higher revision rates.

Authors:  R Kyle Martin; Andreas Persson; Gilbert Moatshe; Anne Marie Fenstad; Lars Engebretsen; Jon Olav Drogset; Håvard Visnes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.114

4.  Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tobias Konow; Johanna Bätz; David Beverland; Tim Board; Frank Lampe; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.