Literature DB >> 33789467

Limb-salvage reconstruction following resection of pelvic bone sarcomas involving the acetabulum.

Tomohiro Fujiwara1,2, Manuel Ricardo Medellin Rincon1, Andrea Sambri1, Yusuke Tsuda1, Rhys Clark1, Jonathan Stevenson1, Michael C Parry1, Robert J Grimer1, Lee Jeys1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Limb salvage for pelvic sarcomas involving the acetabulum is a major surgical challenge. There remains no consensus about what is the optimum type of reconstruction after resection of the tumour. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes in these patients according to the methods of periacetabular reconstruction.
METHODS: The study involved a consecutive series of 122 patients with a periacetabular bone sarcoma who underwent limb-salvage surgery involving a custom-made prosthesis in 65 (53%), an ice-cream cone prosthesis in 21 (17%), an extracorporeal irradiated autograft in 18 (15%), and nonskeletal reconstruction in 18 (15%).
RESULTS: The rates of major complications necessitating further surgery were 62%, 24%, 56%, and 17% for custom-made prostheses, ice-cream cone prostheses, irradiated autografts and nonskeletal reconstructions, respectively (p = 0.001). The ten-year cumulative incidence of failure of the reconstruction was 19%, 9%, 33%, and 0%, respectively. The major cause of failure was deep infection (11%), followed by local recurrence (6%). The mean functional Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scores were 59%, 74%, 64%, and 72%, respectively. The scores were significantly lower in patients with major complications than in those without complications (mean 52% (SD 20%) vs 74% (SD 19%); p < 0.001). For periacetabular resections involving the ilium, the mean score was the highest with custom-made prostheses (82% (SD 10%)) in patients without any major complication; however, nonskeletal reconstruction resulted in the highest mean scores (78% (SD 12%)) in patients who had major complications. For periacetabular resections not involving the ilium, significantly higher mean scores were obtained with ice-cream cone prostheses (79% (SD 17%); p = 0.031).
CONCLUSION: Functional outcome following periacetabular reconstruction is closely associated with the occurrence of complications requiring further surgery. For tumours treated with periacetabular and iliac resection, skeletal reconstruction may result in the best outcomes in the absence of complications, whereas nonskeletal reconstruction is a reasonable option if the risk of complications is high. For tumours requiring periacetabular resection without the ilium, reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis supported by antibiotic-laden cement is a reliable option. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):795-803.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabulum; Bone sarcoma; Complication; Function; Pelvis; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33789467     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-0665.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

Review 1.  Periacetabular reconstruction following limb-salvage surgery for pelvic sarcomas.

Authors:  Tomohiro Fujiwara; Koichi Ogura; Alexander Christ; Meredith Bartelstein; Shachar Kenan; Nicola Fabbri; John Healey
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.072

2.  Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?

Authors:  Tomohiro Fujiwara; Yusuke Tsuda; Jonathan Stevenson; Michael Parry; Lee Jeys
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.072

3.  Combined and Modified Gibson and Ilioinguinal Approaches in Type II + III Internal Hemipelvectomy for Periacetabular Tumors.

Authors:  Xin Hu; Minxun Lu; Jie Wang; Longqing Li; Li Min; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Development of a 3D-printed pelvic CT phantom combined with fresh pathological tissues of bone tumor.

Authors:  Xiaomin Li; Bing Wu; Yixuan Zou; Guozhi Zhang; Siyu Liu; Lulu Zhao; Zhengjia Zhang; Wen Wu; Chenglei Liu; Songtao Ai
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.