Literature DB >> 3378932

Maintenance requirements and energetic efficiency of cows of different breed types.

J C Solis1, F M Byers, G T Schelling, C R Long, L W Greene.   

Abstract

Dry, nonpregnant, mature cows (greater than 10 yr) of five breeds (Angus, A; Brahman, B; Hereford, He; Holstein, Ho; and Jersey, J) and their crosses (n = 60) were used in a 428-d experiment to determine maintenance energy requirements and efficiency of energy exchange. Cows were fed individually (via Calan electronic gates) a 70% cottonseed hull diet for four consecutive periods (127, 105, 97 and 99 d) at each of four levels (50, 83, 117 and 150% of each animal's estimated maintenance requirement). Each of four cows/breed group was assigned to one of the four feeding levels each period, with one cow fed each level each period. Body composition was measured initially and following each period in all cows via D2O dilution with a two-pool kinetics model procedure. Average ending live weight and empty body weight, protein and fat were similar to beginning values, indicating that cows began and ended in similar body composition. Dry matter digestibility (DMD) following the last period averaged 54.7%. Average DMD was 53.5, 57.8, 52.0, 55.0 and 51.7% (standard error of mean [SE] = 2.1) for A, B, He, Ho and J; values for He and J were lower (P less than .05) than for B. Diet digestible energy (DE) was similar for all breed types and averaged 62.4% of gross energy (GE). A small decrease in DE with increasing GE intake was noted for all breed types. The daily metabolizable energy requirement for weight equilibrium for A, B, He, Ho and J differed (P less than .01) and was 100, 98, 108, 119 and 152 kcal/kg.75 (SE 4.8), respectively, with an overall mean of 107. The ME for maintenance (MEm) was 91.6, 93.8, 95.3, 115.7 and 140.4 kcal/kg.75 for A, B, He, Ho and J (SE 6.0), respectively, with an overall mean of 101.9. Efficiency of weight change for A, B, He, Ho and J differed (P less than .01) and was 116, 135, 80, 116 and 58 g/Mcal ME intake, respectively, with an overall mean of 96. The respective efficiency of ME use for tissue energy gain or loss was 80.6, 66.8, 66.0, 36.5 and 36.2% for A, B, He, Ho and J, with an average energetic efficiency of 60.1%. In general, maintenance requirements for weight and energy equilibrium were lower in beef breeds and their crosses than in dairy breeds and their crosses. Efficiency of ME use also favored the beef breeds over the dairy breeds.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3378932     DOI: 10.2527/jas1988.663764x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  The effects of metabolizable energy intake on body fat depots of adult Pelibuey ewes fed roughage diets under tropical conditions.

Authors:  A J Chay-Canul; A J Ayala-Burgos; J C Ku-Vera; J G Magaña-Monforte; L O Tedeschi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Effect of cattle breed and basal diet on digestibility, rumen bacterial communities, and eating and rumination activity.

Authors:  Pedro H V Carvalho; Ana C J Pinto; Danilo D Millen; Tara L Felix
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Feed efficiency of tropically adapted cattle when fed in winter or spring in a temperate location.

Authors:  Sam W Coleman; Chad C Chase; William A Phillips; David Greg Riley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Herbage mass and allowance and animal genotype affect daily herbage intake, productivity, and efficiency of beef cows grazing native subtropical grassland.

Authors:  Martin Do Carmo; Teresa C M Genro; Andrés F Cibils; Pablo M Soca
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Maintenance Energy Requirements of Double-Muscled Belgian Blue Beef Cows.

Authors:  Leo O Fiems; Johan L De Boever; José M Vanacker; Sam De Campeneere
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Isoquinoline alkaloids supplementation on performance and carcass traits of feedlot bulls.

Authors:  Alex Michels; Mikael Neumann; Guilherme Fernando Mattos Leão; Angela Maria Reck; Heloisa Godoi Bertagnon; Leandro Sâmia Lopes; André Martins de Souza; Leslei Caroline Dos Santos; Edelmir Sílvio Stadler Júnior
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Retained energy in lactating beef cows; effects on maintenance energy requirement and voluntary feed intake.

Authors:  Emma A Briggs; Amanda L Holder; Megan A Gross; Alexandra N Moehlenpah; Jared D Taylor; R R Reuter; Andrew P Foote; Carla L Goad; David L Lalman
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-25

8.  Relationships among feed efficiency traits across production segments and production cycles in cattle.

Authors:  Phillip A Lancaster; Michael E Davis; Jack J Rutledge; Larry V Cundiff
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-23

9.  How much energetic trade-offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species.

Authors:  Frédéric Douhard; Mathieu Douhard; Hélène Gilbert; Philippe Monget; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Jean-François Lemaître
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.183

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.