| Literature DB >> 33788826 |
Xianfeng Zhang1, Xianjun Zhang2, Xinguo Li1, Hongbing Bao1, Guang Li1, Ning Li1, Hengli Li1, Jian Dou3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs frequently in China, with high morbidity and mortality. Cell division cycle 20 homolog (CDC20) is reportedly related to many cancers. In this study, we discuss a potential link of CDC20 expression to HCC patients' prognoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to assess CDC20 expression in HCC and the paired noncancerous tissues. Chi-square analysis was used to assess potential association of CDC20 expression with clinicopathologic profiles among HCC patients. The overall survival for HCC patients with different CDC20 expressions was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. To evaluate the prognostic value for HCC patients, Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS The expression of CDC20 was elevated among HCC specimens compared with adjacent noncancerous ones (P<0.05). The expression of CDC20 was significantly related to differentiation (P<0.001), tumor node metastasis stage (P<0.001), and lymphatic metastasis (P<0.001). Moreover, HCC patients with high CDC20 expression had dismal overall survival rates compared with low CDC20 expression (P<0.05). CDC20 alone could forecast HCC prognoses according to multivariable Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio=2.354, 95% confidence interval=1.177-4.709, P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS Overexpressed CDC20 may act as a reliable biomarker for dismal prognoses among HCC patients.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33788826 PMCID: PMC8020723 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.926760
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Association of CDC20 gene expression with clinicopathologic features of HCC patients.
| Features | No. N=139 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (n=65) | High (n=74) | |||
| Age (years) | ||||
| <60 | 69 | 34 | 35 | 0.556 |
| ≥60 | 70 | 31 | 39 | |
| Sex | ||||
| Men | 74 | 33 | 41 | 0.585 |
| Women | 65 | 32 | 33 | |
| Tumor size | ||||
| <5 cm | 62 | 30 | 32 | 0.731 |
| ≥5 cm | 77 | 35 | 42 | |
| Differentiation | ||||
| High | 60 | 43 | 17 | <0.001 |
| Low-moderate | 79 | 22 | 57 | |
| Tumor node metastasis stage | ||||
| I–II | 59 | 40 | 19 | <0.001 |
| III–IV | 80 | 25 | 55 | |
| Lymphatic metastasis | ||||
| Yes | 73 | 23 | 50 | <0.001 |
| No | 66 | 42 | 24 | |
Figure 1CDC20 expression level between hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues. * P<0.05.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier analysis for hepatocellular carcinoma patients based on the expression of CDC20.
Univariable and multivariate Cox regression analyses for CDC20 in HCC patients.
| Characteristics | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | HR (95%CI) | |||
| 2.464 (1.245–4.876) | 0.010 | 2.354 (1.177–4.709) | 0.016 | |
| Age | 0.670 (0.369–1.219) | 0.190 | – | – |
| Sex | 0.834 (0.460–1.512) | 0.550 | – | – |
| Tumor size | 0.863 (0.474–1.573) | 0.631 | – | – |
| Differentiation | 1.930 (1.007–3.700) | 0.048 | – | – |
| TNM stage | 1.304 (0.689–2.469) | 0.415 | – | – |
| Lymphatic metastasis | 1.944 (1.049–3.602) | 0.035 | ||
HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma; HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval; TNM – tumor node metastasis.
Statistically significant.