Y Lunsky1, N Kithulegoda2,3, K Thai2,4, J L Benham5,6, R Lang6, L Desveaux2,3, N M Ivers2,3. 1. Azrieli Adult Neurodevelopmental Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Womens College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 6. Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Workers supporting adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience significant stress in their essential role during COVID-19 due to the high risk of their clients contracting COVID-19 and having adverse outcomes. The purpose of the current study was to describe the attitudes of workers towards COVID-19 vaccination prior to vaccination rollout, with a view to informing strategies to promote vaccine uptake within this high-risk sector. METHODS: An online survey was sent via email to workers supporting adults with ID in Ontario, Canada, between January 21 and February 3, 2021 by agency leadership and union representatives. RESULTS: Three thousand and three hundred and seventy-one workers, representing approximately 11.2% of Ontario workers supporting adults with ID completed an online survey. Most reported that they were very likely (62%) or likely (20%) to get a COVID-19 vaccine (vaccination intent) although 18% reported they were less likely to do so (vaccination nonintent). Workers with vaccination nonintent were younger and were more likely to endorse the beliefs that (1) it will not benefit them or those around them, (2) it was not part of their job, (3) rapid development confers uncertainties and risks, and (4) they were scared of potential vaccine side effects. CONCLUSIONS: There is need to address common misconceptions among workers supporting adults with ID to help activate them as vaccine advocates in the communities they serve. Partnered efforts between workers, unions and agency leadership with public health experts to address concerns are required.
BACKGROUND: Workers supporting adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience significant stress in their essential role during COVID-19 due to the high risk of their clients contracting COVID-19 and having adverse outcomes. The purpose of the current study was to describe the attitudes of workers towards COVID-19 vaccination prior to vaccination rollout, with a view to informing strategies to promote vaccine uptake within this high-risk sector. METHODS: An online survey was sent via email to workers supporting adults with ID in Ontario, Canada, between January 21 and February 3, 2021 by agency leadership and union representatives. RESULTS: Three thousand and three hundred and seventy-one workers, representing approximately 11.2% of Ontario workers supporting adults with ID completed an online survey. Most reported that they were very likely (62%) or likely (20%) to get a COVID-19 vaccine (vaccination intent) although 18% reported they were less likely to do so (vaccination nonintent). Workers with vaccination nonintent were younger and were more likely to endorse the beliefs that (1) it will not benefit them or those around them, (2) it was not part of their job, (3) rapid development confers uncertainties and risks, and (4) they were scared of potential vaccine side effects. CONCLUSIONS: There is need to address common misconceptions among workers supporting adults with ID to help activate them as vaccine advocates in the communities they serve. Partnered efforts between workers, unions and agency leadership with public health experts to address concerns are required.
Authors: Christine Linehan; Gail Birkbeck; Tal Araten-Bergman; Jennifer Baumbusch; Julie Beadle-Brown; Christine Bigby; Valerie Bradley; Michael Brown; Femmianne Bredewold; Masauso Chirwa; Jialiang Cui; Marta Godoy Gimenez; Tiziano Gomeiro; Šárka Kanova; Thilo Kroll; Henan Li; Mac MacLachlan; Jayanthi Narayan; Finiki Nearchou; Adam Nolan; Mary-Ann O'Donovan; Flavia H Santos; Jan Šiška; Tim Stainton; Magnus Tideman; Jan Tossebro Journal: HRB Open Res Date: 2022-04-04
Authors: Anne Kavanagh; Helen Dickinson; Stefanie Dimov; Marissa Shields; Ashley McAllister Journal: Aust N Z J Public Health Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 3.755
Authors: Jude Mary Cénat; Pari-Gole Noorishad; Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Moshirian Farahi; Wina Paul Darius; Aya Mesbahi El Aouame; Olivia Onesi; Cathy Broussard; Sarah E Furyk; Sanni Yaya; Lisa Caulley; Marie-Hélène Chomienne; Josephine Etowa; Patrick R Labelle Journal: J Med Virol Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 20.693
Authors: C Hatton; T Bailey; J Bradshaw; S Caton; S Flynn; A Gillooly; A Jahoda; R Maguire; A Marriott; P Mulhall; E Oloidi; L Taggart; S Todd; D Abbott; S Beyer; N Gore; P Heslop; K Scior; R P Hastings Journal: J Intellect Disabil Res Date: 2021-09-16