Systematic Review of the Management of Ureteroarterial Fistulas After Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion.

OBJECTIVE. No studies or guidelines exist to direct management of ureteroarterial fistula (UAF) after ileal conduit urinary diversion in which the possible risks and complications associated with stent-graft infection from the conduit flora must be reconciled with those of open surgical repair. This study seeks to characterize the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management of this entity through a systematic review of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic search of the English-language literature using the PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases was performed: 264 abstracts were identified. From those abstracts, 32 studies comprising 40 patients with 43 UAFs were selected for analysis. Data points including demographics, clinical presentation, UAF specifications, procedural details, postprocedural complications, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS. Predisposing factors included female sex, chronic ureteral stent placement, and past surgical intervention and irradiation for pelvic malignancy. Fistulization was overwhelmingly unilateral (95.0% of patients) and included the common iliac artery (90.7% of UAFs). Combined endovascular and endoureteral modalities presented similar outcomes compared with surgical approaches in terms of UAF-related mortality (7.1% vs 13.3%, respectively) and complication rates (28.6% vs 26.7%) during a similar median follow-up period (9.5 vs 14.0 months). Endovascular stent-graft infections were present in 14.3% of cases and represented a leading indication for reintervention after endovascular management (50.0%). CONCLUSION. Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of combined endovascular and endoureteral techniques compare favorably with those of surgical approaches in the treatment of UAF after ileal conduit urinary diversion. Although there is a relatively low stent-graft infection rate, close follow-up within the first year after the procedure is required given the propensity of complications to develop during this window. The use of postprocedural antibiotics is uncertain but is likely prudent.