Literature DB >> 33786482

Sex and Gender Bias in Kidney Transplantation: 3D Bioprinting as a Challenge to Personalized Medicine.

Manon van Daal1, Maaike E Muntinga1, Sandra Steffens2, Annemie Halsema3, Petra Verdonk1.   

Abstract

In this article, we explore to what extent sex and gender differences may be reproduced in the 3D bioprinting of kidneys. Sex and gender differences have been observed in kidney function, anatomy, and physiology, and play a role in kidney donation and transplantation through differences in kidney size (sex aspect) and altruism (gender aspect). As a form of personalized medicine, 3D bioprinting might be expected to eliminate sex and gender bias. On the basis of an analysis of recent literature, we conclude that personalized techniques such as 3D bioprinting of kidneys alone do not mean that sex and gender bias does not happen. Therefore, sex and gender considerations should be included into every step of developing and using 3D-bioprinted kidneys: in the choice of design, cells, biomaterials, and X-chromosome-activated cells. © Manon van Daal et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bioprinting; gender; kidney; sex; transplantation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33786482      PMCID: PMC7784814          DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2688-4844


  32 in total

Review 1.  A two way view of gender bias in medicine.

Authors:  M T Ruiz; L M Verbrugge
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Sex redefined.

Authors:  Claire Ainsworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Towards artificial tissue models: past, present, and future of 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  Ahu Arslan-Yildiz; Rami El Assal; Pu Chen; Sinan Guven; Fatih Inci; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 5.  Gender imbalance in living organ donation.

Authors:  Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2002

Review 6.  Naturally acquired microchimerism.

Authors:  Hilary S Gammill; J Lee Nelson
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.203

7.  Male fetal progenitor cells persist in maternal blood for as long as 27 years postpartum.

Authors:  D W Bianchi; G K Zickwolf; G J Weil; S Sylvester; M A DeMaria
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Donor kidney volume and outcomes following live donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  E D Poggio; S Hila; B Stephany; R Fatica; V Krishnamurthi; C del Bosque; D Goldfarb; B Herts; V W Dennis; P S Heeger; W Braun
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  What is personalized medicine: sharpening a vague term based on a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sebastian Schleidgen; Corinna Klingler; Teresa Bertram; Wolf H Rogowski; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Altruism in organ donation: an unnecessary requirement?

Authors:  Greg Moorlock; Jonathan Ives; Heather Draper
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.