Literature DB >> 33786228

Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hexagenerians or Older (≥60 Years) Versus Younger (<60 Years) Patients: Clinico-Endoscopic Profile and Outcome.

Rajpal S Yadav1, Payal Bargujar2, Hans R Pahadiya3, Rahul K Yadav4, Jitendra Upadhyay4, Alok Gupta1, Manoj Lakhotia1.   

Abstract

Background and aims Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding is one of the serious and potentially life-threatening medical emergencies, causing significant mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinico-endoscopic profile and outcome among patients aged <60 years who presented for UGI bleeding compared to those aged ≥60 years. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted among 194 patients who presented with symptoms or signs of UGI bleed. All patients were divided into two groups, group A (age <60 years), and group B (age ≥60 years). UGI endoscopy was performed using Olympus N19 Endoscope. Rockall scoring (RS) system and Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) were used to predict the prognosis and re-bleeding. Results Of the total, group A included 150 (77.31%) patients and group B 44 (22.69%) patients. The most common presentation was hematemesis and melena in both groups, whilst isolated hematochezia was more common in group A (6.67%, vs. 2.27%, p>0.05). The main cause of bleeding was a variceal bleed in both groups, but it was significantly higher in group A patients (p<0.05). Elderly patients had a significantly higher number of peptic ulcer and malignancy-related bleed (p<0.05). Group A patients had a significantly higher proportion of patients with tachycardia (45.33%, vs. 27.27%, p<0.05), shock (43.33% vs. 13.63%, p<0.05), pallor (76.66% vs. 56.81%, p<0.05), and blood transfusion requirement (64% vs. 45.45%, p<0.05) as compared to group B. Thirty days re-bleeding and mortality rate were similar in both the groups. RS in both groups was 5.02±2.12 vs. 5.98±1.91, p>0.05. GBS was 11.65±4.61 vs. 10.68±4.65, p>0.05. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with RS ≥6 and GBS ≥10. Conclusion This study concluded variceal bleeding as a predominant cause of UGI bleed in both age groups, and it was significantly higher in younger. Interestingly, younger patients were more hemodynamically unstable, probably due to the presence of more severe anemia, shock, and hematochezia. The presence of multiple co-morbidities in both the group kept the 30 days mortality and re-bleed rates similar.
Copyright © 2021, Yadav et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  co-morbidity; mortality; re-bleed; upper gastrointestinal bleeding; varices

Year:  2021        PMID: 33786228      PMCID: PMC7994108          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  24 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Naiman Khan; Akash Nabh; Robert R Schade
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 2.  Incidence of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding/perforation in the general population: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage: radiologic diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jaskolka; Shagran Binkhamis; Vikram Prabhudesai; Tanya P Chawla
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.248

4.  Recent trends in admissions and mortality due to peptic ulcer in England: increasing frequency of haemorrhage among older subjects.

Authors:  J Higham; J-Y Kang; A Majeed
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Prospective validation of the Rockall risk scoring system for upper GI hemorrhage in subgroups of patients with varices and peptic ulcers.

Authors:  D S Sanders; M J Carter; R J Goodchap; S S Cross; D C Gleeson; A J Lobo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  O Blatchford; W R Murray; M Blatchford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Characteristics and outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding after therapeutic endoscopy in the elderly.

Authors:  Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya; Nonthalee Pausawasdi; Nuttiya Laosanguaneak; Jakkrapan Bubthamala; Tawesak Tanwandee; Somchai Leelakusolvong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Adrian J Stanley; Loren Laine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-03-25

9.  Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in patients aged 80 years or more.

Authors:  B T Cooper; C F Weston; C S Neumann
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1988-10

10.  Etiological and Endoscopic Profile of Middle Aged and Elderly Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Pranav Mahajan; Vijant Singh Chandail
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
View more
  2 in total

1.  Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Authors:  Alexander J Kaye; Brooke Baker; Sarah Meyers; Sushil Ahlawat
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Mingyang Song; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.