Literature DB >> 33786217

Sexual Harassment Experiences Across the Academic Medicine Hierarchy.

Chu J Hsiao1, Neeka N Akhavan2, Naykky Singh Ospina3, Kruti J Yagnik4,2, Patrick Neilan5,2, Paulette Hahn6, Zareen Zaidi2.   

Abstract

Background Current estimates of sexual harassment across the academic hierarchy are subject to recall bias and have limited comparability between studies due to inconsistent time frames queried for each stage of training. No studies have surveyed medical students, residents/fellows, and faculty collectively and many studies exclude a wide range of sexual harassment behaviors. We assessed the incidence of sexual harassment across the different stages of academic medicine over the same time frame and within the same institutional culture. Methodology Medical students, residents/fellows, and faculty at the same academic medical campus completed a prospective online study of sexual harassment experiences in 2018. We used a tool that comprehensively assessed sexual harassment behaviors and asked about the perpetrators. Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests (for cell counts <5) were used to compare responses by academic status and gender. Participants were also asked to suggest ways to improve knowledge about university/hospital policies, support services, and reporting process on sexual harassment. Results One-third of 515 respondents (18% of invitations) reported experiencing sexual harassment in 2018. Overall, 52% of medical students, 31% of residents/fellows, and 25% of faculty respondents experienced sexual harassment. Of these, 46% of women and 19% of men reported sexual harassment experiences. The most common experiences across all levels of academic hierarchy were offensive and sexually suggestive comments or jokes and offensive and intrusive questions about one's private life or physical appearance. The most common perpetrators were "student, intern, resident, or fellow," followed by "patient or patient's family member." To improve knowledge about the policies and services regarding sexual harassment, participants suggested facilitating easy access to resources, increasing awareness, assuring confidentiality, protecting against retaliation, and continued education and reminders about the topic. Conclusions Sexual harassment may be more prevalent than the literature suggests and incidence tends to decrease with increasing academic hierarchy. Harassment can often be subtle and can pass under the radar.
Copyright © 2021, Hsiao et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  culture of medicine; faculty; medical education; medical students; residents; sexual harassment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33786217      PMCID: PMC7992916          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence of Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine.

Authors:  Sabine Jenner; Pia Djermester; Judith Prügl; Christine Kurmeyer; Sabine Oertelt-Prigione
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  It Is Time for Zero Tolerance for Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine.

Authors:  Carol K Bates; Reshma Jagsi; Lynn K Gordon; Elizabeth Travis; Archana Chatterjee; Marin Gillis; Olivia Means; Linda Chaudron; Rebecca Ganetzky; Martha Gulati; Barbara Fivush; Poonam Sharma; Amelia Grover; Diana Lautenberger; Terence R Flotte
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Characteristics of Faculty Accused of Academic Sexual Misconduct in the Biomedical and Health Sciences.

Authors:  Magdalena Espinoza; David Hsiehchen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Experiences of Academic Medical Faculty.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle Jones; Chithra R Perumalswami; Peter Ubel; Abigail Stewart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Harassment and discrimination in medical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Naif Fnais; Charlene Soobiah; Maggie Hong Chen; Erin Lillie; Laure Perrier; Mariam Tashkhandi; Sharon E Straus; Muhammad Mamdani; Mohammed Al-Omran; Andrea C Tricco
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.893

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  An Institutional Approach to Harassment.

Authors:  Penelope Smyth
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-08-25

2.  Exploring Professionalism Dilemma and Moral Distress through Medical Students' Eyes: A Mixed-Method Study.

Authors:  Cordelia Cho; Wendy Y K Ko; Olivia M Y Ngan; Wai Tat Wong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.