Christoph Josef Hemmer1, Frank Hufert, Stefan Siewert, Emil Reisinger. 1. Department of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Rostock University Medical CenterDepartment of Microbiology & Virology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneInstitute for Implant Technology and Biomaterials (IIB); Rostock University Medical Center.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of 2020 the SARS-CoV-2 virus has spread to nearly every country in the world. The mainly airborne pathogen has led to large numbers of deaths, principally in elderly and vulnerable segments of the population. Protective vaccines have recently become available, but it is not yet clear whether and when population-wide immunity will be achieved. The existence of evidence for the protective effect of masks covering the mouth and nose is a topic of public debate. METHODS: A selective literature search was carried out in PubMed. Data from the German Robert Koch Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were also taken into account. RESULTS: When talking, as many as 20 000 droplets ranging in size from 20 to 500 μM are released every second. According to PCR tests, the amount of virus exhaled is highest immediately before the onset of symptoms. No randomized trials have been conducted on the effect of masks covering the mouth and nose. A metaanalysis of 29 studies on infection with SARS-CoV-2, SARS, or MERS revealed that type N-95 masks (corresponding approximately to FFP-2), surgical masks, or similar multilayer cotton masks can greatly reduce the infection risk for the wearers (RR 0.34 [0.26; 0.45], with moderate heterogeneity [I2 = 48%]). Model experiments and case reports suggest that masks covering the mouth and nose afford considerable protection against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other airborne diseases by reducing release of and exposure to potentially infectious droplets; in addition, infections that do occur take a milder course. A limitation of the studies analyzed is that in most cases, this effect cannot be viewed in isolation from the protective impact of other measures (distancing, hygiene precautions). CONCLUSION: It can plausibly be assumed that consistent use of masks covering the mouth and nose can play an important role in containing the spread of SARSCoV- 2.
BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of 2020 the SARS-CoV-2 virus has spread to nearly every country in the world. The mainly airborne pathogen has led to large numbers of deaths, principally in elderly and vulnerable segments of the population. Protective vaccines have recently become available, but it is not yet clear whether and when population-wide immunity will be achieved. The existence of evidence for the protective effect of masks covering the mouth and nose is a topic of public debate. METHODS: A selective literature search was carried out in PubMed. Data from the German Robert Koch Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were also taken into account. RESULTS: When talking, as many as 20 000 droplets ranging in size from 20 to 500 μM are released every second. According to PCR tests, the amount of virus exhaled is highest immediately before the onset of symptoms. No randomized trials have been conducted on the effect of masks covering the mouth and nose. A metaanalysis of 29 studies on infection with SARS-CoV-2, SARS, or MERS revealed that type N-95 masks (corresponding approximately to FFP-2), surgical masks, or similar multilayer cotton masks can greatly reduce the infection risk for the wearers (RR 0.34 [0.26; 0.45], with moderate heterogeneity [I2 = 48%]). Model experiments and case reports suggest that masks covering the mouth and nose afford considerable protection against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other airborne diseases by reducing release of and exposure to potentially infectious droplets; in addition, infections that do occur take a milder course. A limitation of the studies analyzed is that in most cases, this effect cannot be viewed in isolation from the protective impact of other measures (distancing, hygiene precautions). CONCLUSION: It can plausibly be assumed that consistent use of masks covering the mouth and nose can play an important role in containing the spread of SARSCoV- 2.
Authors: Matthew J Memoli; Lindsay Czajkowski; Susan Reed; Rani Athota; Tyler Bristol; Kathleen Proudfoot; Sarah Fargis; Matthew Stein; Rebecca L Dunfee; Pamela A Shaw; Richard T Davey; Jeffery K Taubenberger Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Christian Georgi; Anja Haase-Fielitz; Daniel Meretz; Linda Gäsert; Christian Butter Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Michel Bielecki; Roland Züst; Denise Siegrist; Daniele Meyerhofer; Giovanni Andrea Gerardo Crameri; Zeno Stanga; Andreas Stettbacher; Thomas Werner Buehrer; Jeremy Werner Deuel Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Emeline Han; Melisa Mei Jin Tan; Eva Turk; Devi Sridhar; Gabriel M Leung; Kenji Shibuya; Nima Asgari; Juhwan Oh; Alberto L García-Basteiro; Johanna Hanefeld; Alex R Cook; Li Yang Hsu; Yik Ying Teo; David Heymann; Helen Clark; Martin McKee; Helena Legido-Quigley Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christina C Bartenschlager; Selin Temizel; Alanna Ebigbo; Vivian Gruenherz; Petra Gastmeier; Helmut Messmann; Jens O Brunner; Christoph Römmele Journal: Value Health Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 5.101
Authors: Martina Sombetzki; Petra Lücker; Manja Ehmke; Sabrina Bock; Martina Littmann; Emil C Reisinger; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Anika Kästner Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-12-20
Authors: Bettina Maria Zimmermann; Johanna Eichinger; Franziska Schönweitz; Alena Buyx Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Alice Freiberg; Katy Horvath; Taurai Monalisa Hahne; Stephanie Drössler; Daniel Kämpf; Anke Spura; Bernhard Buhs; Nadine Reibling; Freia De Bock; Christian Apfelbacher; Andreas Seidler Journal: Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 1.513