Literature DB >> 33784869

Using a biologically mimicking climbing robot to explore the performance landscape of climbing in lizards.

Johanna T Schultz1,2, Hendrik K Beck3, Tina Haagensen1, Tasmin Proost1, Christofer J Clemente1.   

Abstract

Locomotion is a key aspect associated with ecologically relevant tasks for many organisms, therefore, survival often depends on their ability to perform well at these tasks. Despite this significance, we have little idea how different performance tasks are weighted when increased performance in one task comes at the cost of decreased performance in another. Additionally, the ability for natural systems to become optimized to perform a specific task can be limited by structural, historic or functional constraints. Climbing lizards provide a good example of these constraints as climbing ability likely requires the optimization of tasks which may conflict with one another such as increasing speed, avoiding falls and reducing the cost of transport (COT). Understanding how modifications to the lizard bauplan can influence these tasks may allow us to understand the relative weighting of different performance objectives among species. Here, we reconstruct multiple performance landscapes of climbing locomotion using a 10 d.f. robot based upon the lizard bauplan, including an actuated spine, shoulders and feet, the latter which interlock with the surface via claws. This design allows us to independently vary speed, foot angles and range of motion (ROM), while simultaneously collecting data on climbed distance, stability and efficiency. We first demonstrate a trade-off between speed and stability, with high speeds resulting in decreased stability and low speeds an increased COT. By varying foot orientation of fore- and hindfeet independently, we found geckos converge on a narrow optimum of foot angles (fore 20°, hind 100°) for both speed and stability, but avoid a secondary wider optimum (fore -20°, hind -50°) highlighting a possible constraint. Modifying the spine and limb ROM revealed a gradient in performance. Evolutionary modifications in movement among extant species over time appear to follow this gradient towards areas which promote speed and efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal evolution; biomimetics; evolutionary biomechanics; evolutionary constraints; lizard climbing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33784869      PMCID: PMC8059955          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Predicting the Movement Speeds of Animals in Natural Environments.

Authors:  Robbie S Wilson; Jerry F Husak; Lewis G Halsey; Christofer J Clemente
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  Dynamics of rapid vertical climbing in cockroaches reveals a template.

Authors:  Daniel I Goldman; Tao S Chen; Daniel M Dudek; Robert J Full
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Differential leg function in a sprawled-posture quadrupedal trotter.

Authors:  J J Chen; A M Peattie; K Autumn; R J Full
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Dynamics of geckos running vertically.

Authors:  K Autumn; S T Hsieh; D M Dudek; J Chen; C Chitaphan; R J Full
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Field use of maximal sprint speed by collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): compensation and sexual selection.

Authors:  Jerry F Husak; Stanley F Fox
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Lateral undulation of the flexible spine of sprawling posture vertebrates.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Aihong Ji; Poramate Manoonpong; Huan Shen; Jie Hu; Zhendong Dai; Zhiwei Yu
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Robotics-inspired biology.

Authors:  Nick Gravish; George V Lauder
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Lizard tricks: overcoming conflicting requirements of speed versus climbing ability by altering biomechanics of the lizard stride.

Authors:  Christofer J Clemente; Philip C Withers; Graham G Thompson; David Lloyd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  How inclines affect the escape behaviour of a dune-dwelling lizard, Uma scoparia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  When natural selection should optimize speed-accuracy trade-offs.

Authors:  Angelo Pirrone; Tom Stafford; James A R Marshall
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

1.  Body Caudal Undulation Measured by Soft Sensors and Emulated by Soft Artificial Muscles.

Authors:  Fabian Schwab; Elias T Lunsford; Taehwa Hong; Fabian Wiesemüller; Mirko Kovac; Yong-Lae Park; Otar Akanyeti; James C Liao; Ardian Jusufi
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 2.  The Roles and Comparison of Rigid and Soft Tails in Gecko-Inspired Climbing Robots: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Guangyuan Zang; Zhendong Dai; Poramate Manoonpong
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.