Literature DB >> 33784599

SoftSeg: Advantages of soft versus binary training for image segmentation.

Charley Gros1, Andreanne Lemay1, Julien Cohen-Adad2.   

Abstract

Most image segmentation algorithms are trained on binary masks formulated as a classification task per pixel. However, in applications such as medical imaging, this "black-and-white" approach is too constraining because the contrast between two tissues is often ill-defined, i.e., the voxels located on objects' edges contain a mixture of tissues (a partial volume effect). Consequently, assigning a single "hard" label can result in a detrimental approximation. Instead, a soft prediction containing non-binary values would overcome that limitation. In this study, we introduce SoftSeg, a deep learning training approach that takes advantage of soft ground truth labels, and is not bound to binary predictions. SoftSeg aims at solving a regression instead of a classification problem. This is achieved by using (i) no binarization after preprocessing and data augmentation, (ii) a normalized ReLU final activation layer (instead of sigmoid), and (iii) a regression loss function (instead of the traditional Dice loss). We assess the impact of these three features on three open-source MRI segmentation datasets from the spinal cord gray matter, the multiple sclerosis brain lesion, and the multimodal brain tumor segmentation challenges. Across multiple random dataset splittings, SoftSeg outperformed the conventional approach, leading to an increase in Dice score of 2.0% on the gray matter dataset (p=0.001), 3.3% for the brain lesions, and 6.5% for the brain tumors. SoftSeg produces consistent soft predictions at tissues' interfaces and shows an increased sensitivity for small objects (e.g., multiple sclerosis lesions). The richness of soft labels could represent the inter-expert variability, the partial volume effect, and complement the model uncertainty estimation, which is typically unclear with binary predictions. The developed training pipeline can easily be incorporated into most of the existing deep learning architectures. SoftSeg is implemented in the freely-available deep learning toolbox ivadomed (https://ivadomed.org).
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep Learning; Label Smoothing; Partial Volume Effect; Segmentation; Soft mask; Soft training

Year:  2021        PMID: 33784599     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  6 in total

1.  Deep learning-based GTV contouring modeling inter- and intra- observer variability in sarcomas.

Authors:  Thibault Marin; Yue Zhuo; Rita Maria Lahoud; Fei Tian; Xiaoyue Ma; Fangxu Xing; Maryam Moteabbed; Xiaofeng Liu; Kira Grogg; Nadya Shusharina; Jonghye Woo; Ruth Lim; Chao Ma; Yen-Lin E Chen; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Uncertainty Quantification in Segmenting Tuberculosis-Consistent Findings in Frontal Chest X-rays.

Authors:  Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman; Ghada Zamzmi; Feng Yang; Zhiyun Xue; Stefan Jaeger; Sameer K Antani
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-04

3.  Rapid, automated nerve histomorphometry through open-source artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Simeon Christian Daeschler; Marie-Hélène Bourget; Dorsa Derakhshan; Vasudev Sharma; Stoyan Ivaylov Asenov; Tessa Gordon; Julien Cohen-Adad; Gregory Howard Borschel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Automated pancreas segmentation and volumetry using deep neural network on computed tomography.

Authors:  Sang-Heon Lim; Young Jae Kim; Yeon-Ho Park; Doojin Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Doo-Ho Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Agrast-6: Abridged VGG-Based Reflected Lightweight Architecture for Binary Segmentation of Depth Images Captured by Kinect.

Authors:  Karolis Ryselis; Tomas Blažauskas; Robertas Damaševičius; Rytis Maskeliūnas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Muscle and adipose tissue segmentations at the third cervical vertebral level in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Kareem A Wahid; Brennan Olson; Rishab Jain; Aaron J Grossberg; Dina El-Habashy; Cem Dede; Vivian Salama; Moamen Abobakr; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Renjie He; Joel Jaskari; Jaakko Sahlsten; Kimmo Kaski; Clifton D Fuller; Mohamed A Naser
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 8.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.