Literature DB >> 33784598

Tocilizumab vs placebo for the treatment of giant cell arteritis with polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms, cranial symptoms or both in a randomized trial.

Robert Spiera1, Sebastian H Unizony2, Min Bao3, Yves Luder4, Jian Han3, Andrey Pavlov5, John H Stone2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled GiACTA trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). The present study evaluated the efficacy of TCZ in patients with GCA presenting with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) symptoms only, cranial symptoms only or both PMR and cranial symptoms in the GiACTA trial.
METHODS: In GiACTA, 250 patients with GCA received either TCZ weekly or every other week plus a 26-week prednisone taper or PBO plus a 26- or 52-week prednisone taper. This post hoc analysis assessed baseline characteristics, sustained remission rate, number of flares, annualized flare rate, time to flare, cumulative prednisone dose, methotrexate use and safety in patients with PMR symptoms only, cranial symptoms only or both at baseline.
RESULTS: Overall, 52 patients had PMR symptoms only, 94 had cranial symptoms only and 104 had both symptoms at baseline. At Week 52, rates of sustained remission were significantly higher with TCZ vs PBO in all 3 groups (PMR only, 45.2% vs 19.0%, P = 0.0446; cranial only, 60.3% vs 19.4%, P = 0.0001; PMR and cranial, 55.0% vs 11.4%, P < 0.0001). Smaller proportions of TCZ-treated patients experienced disease flare than PBO-treated patients across all groups (PMR only, 41.9% vs 57.1%; cranial only, 20.7% vs 47.2%; PMR and cranial, 31.7% vs 81.8%). Annualized flare rate and risk of flare were significantly lower with TCZ vs PBO for patients with cranial symptoms only and both symptoms; they were numerically lower, but did not reach statistical significance, in the smaller group of patients with PMR symptoms only.
CONCLUSIONS: TCZ improved clinical outcomes in patients who presented with PMR symptoms only, cranial symptoms only or both at baseline, suggesting that TCZ is effective in patients with GCA regardless of the presenting clinical phenotype.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologicals; Clinical trial; Giant cell arteritis; Randomized trial; Vasculitis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33784598     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  4 in total

1.  Hypocomplementemia during tocilizumab treatment: Long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Amir Bieber; Doron Markovits; Kohava Toledano; Yonit Tavor; Reuven Mader; Alexandra Balbir-Gurman; Yolanda Braun-Moscovici
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Need and value of targeted immunosuppressive therapy in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Maria Sandovici; Niels van der Geest; Yannick van Sleen; Elisabeth Brouwer
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-02

Review 3.  Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA).

Authors:  Alexis Régent; Luc Mouthon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Is Tocilizumab Effective and Safe in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant-Cell Arteritis With Polymyalgia Rheumatica?

Authors:  Michelle Farinango; Akhil Ansary; Amulya Dakka; Zahra Nazir; Humaira Shamim; Marie Jean; Muaaz Umair; Pratyusha Muddaloor; Yeny Chavarria; Safeera Khan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.