| Literature DB >> 33782496 |
Lichao Wang1, Yao Liu1, Xiaomin Zhu1, Zhen Zhang2, Xueqi Huang1.
Abstract
Although it is well-documented that invasion of invasive plants is promoted with allelopathic effects by inhibiting the growth and phenotypic performance of native plants, little is known conversely. In this study, the allelopathy effects of a native plant, Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr., on a typical invasive species Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb., was investigated by exposing A. philoxeroides seedlings to three chemical solvent extracts (i.e., petroleum ether extract (PE), ethyl acetate extract (EE), and n-butanol extract (NE) of H. scandens root (HR). The three chemical extracts inhibited the growth, stem length, node number, leaf number, leaf area, and root number, and increased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of A. philoxeroides seedlings, which indicated that the extracts inhibited the plant growth by damaging the membrane system of leaves. And the synthetical effect of allelopathy (SE) index indicated that EE had the greatest inhibition on the growth of A. philoxeroides. Fifty compounds were identified from the three extracts of HR using GC-MS analysis, among which 5 compounds (dibutyl phthalate, stigmasta-3,5-diene, 2,6-Di-tert-butylphenol campesterol, and neophytadiene) were identified from H. scandens root extracts for the first time. And n-hexadecanoic acid exists in all three extracts. The findings of the present study provide a novel method to potentially control the invasion of A. philoxeroides. However, field monitoring under natural conditions would be necessary to confirm in practice the results obtained with the bioassays.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33782496 PMCID: PMC8007610 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86656-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The effects of different subsurface extracts on the growth of A. philoxeoides. (A) stem length and (B) node number of ramets and (C) leaf number of ramets and (D) leaf area and (E) root length and (F) root number of A. phlioxeoldes (from left to right, the columns are control, Petroleum ether (PE), ethyl acetate (EE) and n-Butanol (NE)). The bars in the figure stand for the Std. Deviation of the replications (n = 5). The treatments with the same letter are not significantly difference at 0.05 level.
Effects of three chemical extracts on the biomass, LAR and Root/shoot ratio of A.philoxeroides (Mean ± SD).
| Aboveground biomass | Belowground biomass | Total biomass | Leaf area ratio(LAR) | Root/shoot ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 21.25 ± 5.73a | 3.65 ± 0.66b | 24.9 ± 5.51a | 4.67 ± 0.96a | 0.18 ± 0.06b |
| Petroleum ether (PE) | 15.8 ± 2.34b | 5 ± 0.42a | 20.8 ± 2.01ab | 2.26 ± 0.19b | 0.33 ± 0.07a |
| Ethyl acetate (EE) | 7.04 ± 0.93c | 1.02 ± 0.29d | 8.06 ± 1.01d | 2.37 ± 1.03b | 0.15 ± 0.05b |
| N-Butanol (NE) | 14.83 ± 2.03b | 2.58 ± 0.69c | 17.46 ± 2.63c | 4.34 ± 0.86a | 0.17 ± 0.03b |
The treatments with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.
Figure 2The effect of the three chemical extracts on the leaf enzymes, (A) POD activity and (B) CAT activity and (C) MDA content, of A. philoxeroides (from left to right, the bars are control, PE, EE and NE, respectively). The treatments with the same letter are not significantly difference at 0.05 level.
Compounds in petroleum ether extracts that were identified by GC/MS.
| Compound Name | Petroleum ether extract (PE) | Ethyl acetate extract (EE) | N-Butanol extract (NE) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | 13.99 | 7.38 | 6.29 |
| 2 | Tetradecanoic acid | 0.81 | 0.55 | – |
| 3 | Neophytadiene | 0.52 | 0.89 | – |
| 4 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 2.95 | 11.8 | – |
| 5 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester | 1.66 | 6.13 | – |
| 6 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)- | 1.21 | 4.99 | – |
| 7 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- | 11.79 | 7.62 | – |
| 8 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)- | 12.33 | 4.37 | – |
| 9 | (E)-13-Docosenoic acid | 0.41 | 0.62 | – |
| 10 | Eicosanoic acid | 1.38 | 1.48 | – |
| 11 | Stigmasterol | 0.66 | 2.27 | – |
| 12 | Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, acetate, (3á)- | 2.7 | 1.78 | – |
| 13 | Stigmasta-3,5-diene | 2.29 | 8.75 | – |
| 14 | 1-Heptatriacotanol | 0.4 | – | 2.06 |
| 15 | Stigmastane-3,6-dione, (5à)- | 0.73 | – | 6.73 |
| 16 | á-Sitosterol | 0.46 | – | 5.63 |
| 17 | Betulinaldehyde | – | 0.68 | 1.7 |
| 18 | 1,3-Dioxolane, 4,5-dimethyl-2-pentadecyl- | – | – | 0.73 |
| 19 | Ethanol, 2-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenoxy]- | – | 0.48 | – |
| 20 | Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, butyl ester | – | – | 0.55 |
| 21 | 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroisoquinolin-6-ol-1-carboxylic acid | 0.55 | – | – |
| 22 | 2,6-Di-tert-butylphenol | – | 0.69 | – |
| 23 | 2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl- | 0.56 | – | – |
| 24 | trans-13-Octadecenoic acid | 0.55 | – | – |
| 25 | 17-Octadecynoic acid | – | 0.72 | – |
| 26 | Pentadecanoic acid | 0.96 | – | – |
| 27 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | 1.56 | – | – |
| 28 | Ethanol, 2-(9-octadecenyloxy)-, (Z)- | – | 0.87 | – |
| 29 | 9-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- | – | 0.43 | – |
| 30 | Pentadecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, methyl ester | – | 1.22 | |
| 31 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl octyl ester | – | 0.52 | – |
| 32 | Methyl stearate | – | 1.26 | – |
| 33 | Octadecanoic acid | – | 2.02 | – |
| 34 | Octadecanoic acid | 2.67 | – | – |
| 35 | Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 0.69 | – | – |
| 36 | Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | 2.24 | – | – |
| 37 | Glycidol stearate | 0.7 | ||
| 38 | Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 0.83 | ||
| 39 | Hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester | 1.58 | ||
| 40 | Cholest-5-en-3-one | 0.92 | ||
| 41 | Lup-20(29)-en-3-one | 2.59 | ||
| 42 | 4,22-Stigmastadiene-3-one | 0.64 | ||
| 43 | Eicosanoic acid, methyl ester | 0.87 | ||
| 44 | Docosanoic acid, methyl ester | 1.18 | ||
| 45 | Trilinolein | 0.8 | ||
| 46 | Campesterol | 1.43 | ||
| 47 | Betulin | 0.52 | ||
| 48 | Ursodeoxycholic acid | 1.34 | ||
| 49 | Hexadecanoic acid, butyl ester | 1.5 | ||
| 50 | Oleic acid, eicosyl ester | 2.21 |
The allelopathic effects of the extracts of H.scandens on A.philoxeroides.
| Stem length | Node number | Root length | Root number | Leaf number | Leaf area | Aboveground biomass | Belowground biomass | Total biomass | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petroleum ether | − 0.17 | − 0.20 | 0.26 | − 0.70 | − 0.34 | − 0.58 | − 0.26 | 0.27 | − 0.16 | − 0.209 |
| Ethyl acetate | − 0.41 | − 0.40 | 0.00 | − 0.60 | − 0.55 | − 0.83 | − 0.67 | − 0.72 | − 0.68 | − 0.539 |
| N-Butanol | − 0.09 | − 0.13 | 0.13 | − 0.31 | − 0.14 | − 0.34 | − 0.30 | − 0.29 | − 0.30 | − 0.197 |