Literature DB >> 33782030

Analyses of PD-L1 and Inflammatory Gene Expression Association with Efficacy of Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Gastric Cancer/Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.

Nathan O Siemers1, Zachary Boyd1, Ming Lei2, Dimple Pandya1, Han Chang1, Teresa Sanchez1, Christopher Harbison1, Peter M Szabo1, Yelena Janjigian3, Patrick A Ott4, Padmanee Sharma5, Johanna Bendell6, Thomas R Jeffry Evans7, Filippo de Braud8,9, Ian Chau10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), there is a need to identify biomarkers of response to therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In post hoc exploratory analyses from CheckMate 032 (GC/GEJC cohort), we evaluated associations between nivolumab ± ipilimumab (NIVO ± IPI) efficacy and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, defined by tumor cells (% TC) or combined positive score (CPS; sum of PD-L1-staining TCs + immune cells, divided by total viable TCs, × 100) using the Dako PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay, or inflammatory gene expression.
RESULTS: There was a trend toward increased efficacy (objective response and overall survival) when PD-L1 expression was determined by CPS compared with % TC at higher cutoffs of ≥5 and ≥10 in the pooled analysis of all treatment regimens. In this analysis, 19% and 26% of patients with PD-L1-positive tumors at a CPS cutoff of ≥5 and ≥10, respectively, had an objective response compared with 8% and 9% of patients at the equivalent % TC cutoffs. Longer survival was demonstrated in patients with PD-L1-positive (defined by CPS cutoffs of ≥5 and ≥10) versus PD-L1-negative status. Similar results were observed in the NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg subgroup. Multiple inflammatory gene signatures/transcripts, including a signature consisting of four genes (CD274, CD8A, LAG3, and STAT1), showed associations with response to NIVO ± IPI.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a greater association of PD-L1 expression by CPS with NIVO ± IPI efficacy compared with % TC PD-L1 expression in patients with GC/GEJC. Inflammatory signatures were also associated with NIVO ± IPI response, warranting further investigation.See related commentary by Moutafi and Rimm, p. 3812. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33782030     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  9 in total

1.  Choice of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay influences clinical eligibility for gastric cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Joe Yeong; Huey Yew Jeffrey Lum; Chong Boon Teo; Wei Peng Yong; Raghav Sundar; Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan; Yiong Huak Chan; Ryan Yong Kiat Tay; Joan Rou-En Choo; Anand D Jeyasekharan; Qing Hao Miow; Lit-Hsin Loo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 7.701

Review 2.  The New Era of Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Shogo Takei; Akihito Kawazoe; Kohei Shitara
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Xinhua Chen; Huimin Zhang; Minghao Wang; Hao Liu; Yanfeng Hu; Tian Lin; Hao Chen; Mingli Zhao; Tao Chen; Guoxin Li; Jiang Yu; Liying Zhao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Biomarker analysis from CheckMate 214: nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Toni K Choueiri; David F McDermott; Thomas Powles; Yann-Alexandre Vano; Saurabh Gupta; Jin Yao; Celine Han; Ron Ammar; Simon Papillon-Cavanagh; Shruti S Saggi; M Brent McHenry; Petra Ross-Macdonald; Megan Wind-Rotolo
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 12.469

5.  The epiphany derived from T-cell-inflamed profiles: Pan-cancer characterization of CD8A as a biomarker spanning clinical relevance, cancer prognosis, immunosuppressive environment, and treatment responses.

Authors:  Decao Niu; Yifeng Chen; Hua Mi; Zengnan Mo; Guijian Pang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 6.  Advances in molecular biomarkers research and clinical application progress for gastric cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Hongzhen Cai; Man Li; Ruiyi Deng; Mopei Wang; Yanyan Shi
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2022-08-30

7.  An Inflammatory Signature to Predict the Clinical Benefit of First-Line Cetuximab Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Cavalieri; Mara Serena Serafini; Andrea Carenzo; Silvana Canevari; Deborah Lenoci; Federico Pistore; Rosalba Miceli; Stefania Vecchio; Daris Ferrari; Cecilia Moro; Andrea Sponghini; Alessia Caldara; Maria Cossu Rocca; Simona Secondino; Gabriella Moretti; Nerina Denaro; Francesco Caponigro; Emanuela Vaccher; Gaetana Rinaldi; Francesco Ferraù; Paolo Bossi; Lisa Licitra; Loris De Cecco
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 8.  Harnessing biomarkers of response to improve therapy selection in esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Caroline Yk Fong; Ian Chau
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 9.  Novel Perspectives towards RNA-Based Nano-Theranostic Approaches for Cancer Management.

Authors:  Rabia Arshad; Iqra Fatima; Saman Sargazi; Abbas Rahdar; Milad Karamzadeh-Jahromi; Sadanand Pandey; Ana M Díez-Pascual; Muhammad Bilal
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.076

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.