| Literature DB >> 33781915 |
Roberto Giugliani1, Ana Maria Martins2, Sairei So3, Tatsuyoshi Yamamoto3, Mariko Yamaoka3, Toshiaki Ikeda3, Kazunori Tanizawa3, Hiroyuki Sonoda3, Mathias Schmidt3, Yuji Sato4.
Abstract
In Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis II [MPS-II]), systemic accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) due to a deficiency of iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS), caused by mutations in the IDS gene, leads to multiple somatic manifestations and in patients with the severe (neuronopathic) phenotype, also to central nervous system (CNS) involvement. These symptoms cannot be effectively treated with current enzyme-replacement therapies, as they are unable to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Pabinafusp alfa, a novel IDS fused with an anti-human transferrin receptor antibody, was shown to penetrate the BBB and to address neurodegeneration in preclinical studies. Subsequent phase 1/2 and 2/3 clinical studies in Japan have shown marked reduction of GAG accumulation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), along with favorable clinical responses. A 26-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group phase 2 study was conducted in Brazil to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenously administered pabinafusp alfa at 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/kg/week in MPS-II patients. The safety profiles in the three dosage groups were similar. Neurodevelopmental evaluation suggested positive neurocognitive signals despite a relatively short study period. The 2.0-mg/kg group, which demonstrated marked reductions in substrate concentrations in the CSF, serum, and urine, was considered to provide the best combination regarding safety and efficacy signals.Entities:
Keywords: Hunter syndrome; JR-141; anti-human transferrin receptor antibody; blood-brain barrier; enzyme-replacement therapy; heparan sulfate; iduronate-2-sulfatase; mucopolysaccharidosis II; neurocognitive impairment; pabinafusp alfa
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33781915 PMCID: PMC8261166 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.03.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ther ISSN: 1525-0016 Impact factor: 12.910
Figure 1Trial profile
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics of the study patients
| 1.0 mg/kg (n = 8) | 2.0 mg/kg (n = 5) | 4.0 mg/kg (n = 6) | Total (n = 19) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 8.76 ± 8.95 | 12.93 ± 14.15 | 19.56 ± 18.82 | 13.27 ± 14.01 |
| Mean ± SD | 28.75 ± 15.53 | 39.34 ± 19.01 | 41.52 ± 25.12 | 35.57 ± 19.64 |
| Mean ± SD | 115.65 ± 23.20 | 128.00 ± 18.76 | 128.62 ± 33.69 | 122.99 ± 25.38 |
| Mean (SD) | 20.04 ± 3.29 | 23.01 ± 6.72 | 22.38 ± 4.37 | 21.56 ± 4.63 |
| White (%) | 6 (75.00) | 3 (60.00) | 4 (66.67) | 13 (68.42) |
| African American (%) | 2 (25.00) | 0 | 1 (16.67) | 3 (15.79) |
| Asian (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native American or Inuit (%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.67) | 1 (5.26) |
| Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other (%) | 0 | 2 (40.00) | 0 | 2 (10.53) |
| Positive (%) | 5 (62.50) | 2 (40.00) | 1 (16.67) | 8 (42.11) |
| Negative (%) | 3 (37.50) | 3 (60.00) | 5 (83.33) | 11 (57.89) |
| Attenuated (%) | 1 (12.50) | 1(20.00) | 3(50.00) | 5 (26.32) |
| Neuronopathic (%) | 7 (87.50) | 4 (80.00) | 3 (50.00) | 14 (73.68) |
| Yes (%) | 6 (75.00) | 4 (80.00) | 1 (16.67) | 11 (57.89) |
| No (%) | 2 (25.00) | 1 (20.00) | 5 (83.33) | 8 (42.11) |
Incidence of adverse drug reactions
| 1.0 mg/kg (n = 8) | 2.0 mg/kg (n = 5) | 4.0 mg/kg (n = 7) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 0 | 5 | |
| Urticaria | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dermatitis acneiform | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Erythema | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Hyperhidrosis | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Skin plaque | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 4 | |
| Pyrexia | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Chills | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Infusion site urticaria | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Pain | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| Vomiting | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Nausea | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Infusion-related reaction | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Tremor | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Burning sensation | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Headache | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Somnolence | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Body temperature increased | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Anaphylactic reaction | 0 | 0 | 1 |
ADRs, adverse drug reactions. MedDRA version: 22.0.
Figure 2Time courses of mean plasma concentrations of pabinafusp alfa at weekly dosages of 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/kg at weeks 1 and 26
(A) Week 1. (B) Week 26). The data represent mean ± SD.
Figure 3HS and DS concentrations in the CSF
The data represent mean ± SD.
Figure 4Age-equivalent scores and developmental quotients against chronological age as determined with BSID-III
(A) Age-equivalent scores. (B) Developmental quotients. All patients belong to a severe (neuronopathic) subtype. The curves with asterisks denote the patients naive to ERT.
Figure 5Age-equivalent scores and developmental quotients against chronological age as determined with KABC
(A) Age-equivalent scores. (B) Developmental quotients. All patients belong to the attenuated subtype. The curves with asterisks denote the patients naive to ERT.
Figure 6Changes seen over 52 weeks in three subdomains in VABS-II in the MPS-II patients
The patients include both attenuated and severe subtypes.