| Literature DB >> 33781293 |
Y Wang1, Y M Chu2,3, A Thaljaoui4, Y A Khan5, W Chammam6, S Z Abbas7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ideal treatment of illnesses is the interest of every era. Data innovation in medical care has become extremely quick to analyze diverse diseases from the most recent twenty years. In such a finding, past and current information assume an essential job is utilizing and information mining strategies. We are inadequate in diagnosing the enthusiastic mental unsettling influence precisely in the beginning phases. In this manner, the underlying conclusion of misery expressively positions an extraordinary clinical and Scientific research issue. This work is dedicated to tackling the same issue utilizing the AI strategy. Individuals' dependence on passionate stages has been successfully characterized into various gatherings in the data innovation climate.Entities:
Keywords: Feature selection; Health care; Human-physic; Hybrid classification; Machine learning; Prediction; Retrieval-ranking
Year: 2021 PMID: 33781293 PMCID: PMC8008566 DOI: 10.1186/s13040-021-00254-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BioData Min ISSN: 1756-0381 Impact factor: 2.522
Fig. 1Hybrid Machine Learning Classifier
Fig. 2Hierarchy of ensemble process model of a human-emotion data set
Fig. 4Data Preprocessing Model and Flow Chart of Human-Emotion
Fig. 3The (depress and healthy) people ratio of emotional-physic in the Dataset
Fig. 5Frequency distribution of the human-emotion Dataset
Fig. 6Correlation matrix indicating the relationship between users and posted on the wall
Decomposition of human-emotion Dataset into different component
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | −2.08027e-09 | − 2.18993e-06 | − 0.000225908 | −0.979433 | 0.2005 | 0.0226171 |
| 1 | −1.10172e-09 | −1.96008e-06 | −0.00019204 | −0.0802035 | − 0.489725 | 0.86818 |
| 2 | −3.17951e-07 | −0.00174933 | −0.999998 | 0.00047263 | 0.00113015 | 0.000459961 |
| 3 | −2.32245e-05 | 0.999998 | −0.00174934 | −2.54652e-06 | −3.4531e-06 | −3.12346e-07 |
| 4 | −3.04051e-09 | −5.78577e-06 | −0.00127446 | −0.185145 | − 0.848509 | −0.495734 |
| 5 | −1 | −2.32239e-05 | 3.58583e-07 | 2.59765e-09 | 2.42321e-09 | 3.6474e-10 |
Fig. 7Hierarchy of Pre-processing of Input Data of human-emotion
Non-Scaled Spot Hybrid Classification Outcome of human-emotion data set
| Value I | Value II | Nearest neighbors | Statistical.Sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 0:670071 | 0:031201 | 0.145 |
| LDA | 0:695223 | 0:023165 | 0.631 |
| KNN | 0:777380 | 0:031219 | 0.451 |
| CART | 0:022399 | ||
| NB | 0:684118 | 0:026654 | 0.231 |
| SVM | 0.881639 | 0.019073 | 0.152 |
Tune Scaled Hybrid Classification Outcome of the human-emotion data set
| Value I | Value II | Nearest neighbors | Statistical.Sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scaled- | 0.700392 | 0.031720 | 0.301 |
| Scaled- | 0.695223 | 0.023165 | 0.225 |
| Scaled- | 0.752228 | 0.023799 | 0.053 |
| Scaled- | 0.024908 | ||
| Scaled- | 0.710005 | 0.039495 | 0.065 |
| Scaled- | 0.741100 | 0.026663 | 0.0171 |
Fig. 8The Comparison of Algorithms: a Unscaled Human-Emotion Dataset (b) Scaled-Algorithms (c) Ensemble Algorithms
Tune Scaled KNN Classifier Outcome human-emotion data set
| N neighbors | Value I | Statistical.Sign | Value II | Statistical.Sign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.78624 | 0.013 | 0.03300 | 0.001 |
| 3 | 0.76627 | 0.011 | 0.01836 | 0.004 |
| 5 | 0.75147 | 0.021 | 0.02262 | 0.0021 |
| 7 | 0.73150 | 0.013 | 0.02176 | 0.000 |
| 9 | 0.71449 | 0.031 | 0.02097 | 0.003 |
| 11 | 0.71301 | 0.027 | 0.02562 | 0.001 |
| 13 | 0.71671 | 0.017 | 0.03586 | 0.007 |
| 15 | 0.72189 | 0.025 | 0.02929 | 0.000 |
| 17 | 0.71893 | 0.022 | 0.02922 | 0.0015 |
| 19 | 0.72189 | 0.021 | 0.03677 | 0.000 |
| 21 | 0.73076 | 0.019 | 0.04111 | 0.000 |
Tune Scaled SVM Classifier Outcome of human-emotion data set
| C | kernel | Case | Method-I | Statistical.Sign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 0.696746 | 0.033947 | 0.011 | |
| 0.707840 | 0.038778 | 0.009 | ||
| 0.710059 | 0.036611 | 0.031 | ||
| 0.669379 | 0.037225 | 0.025 | ||
| 0.3 | Linear poly rbf sigmoid | 0.696746 | 0.030322 | 0.000 |
| 0.726331 | 0.035084 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.737426 | 0.032385 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.640533 | 0.028286 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.5 | Linear poly rbf sigmoid | 0.696746 | 0.030322 | 0.017 |
| 0.727811 | 0.029701 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.741864 | 0.029337 | 0.001 | ||
| 0.611686 | 0.029381 | 0.001 | ||
| 0.7 | Linear poly rbf sigmoid | 0.696006 | 0.029449 | 0.007 |
| 0.733728 | 0.030033 | 0.009 | ||
| 0.741124 | 0.028504 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.610947 | 0.027179 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.9 | Linear poly rbf sigmoid | 0.696006 | 0.028643 | 0.000 |
| 0.731509 | 0.033354 | 0.013 | ||
| 0.741864 | 0.027550 | 0.021 | ||
| 0.608728 | 0.031313 | 0.000 | ||
| 1.0 | Linear poly rbf sigmoid | 0.699704 | 0.026675 | 0.013 |
| 0.730030 | 0.030996 | 0.011 | ||
| 0.732988 | 0.026132 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.745562 | 0.030979 | 0.000 | ||
| 1.5 | Linear poly rbf sigmoid | 0.601331 | 0.029092 | 0.000 |
| 0.699704 | 0.033734 | 0.007 | ||
| 0.733728 | 0.032625 | 0.021 | ||
| 0.745562 | 0.032338 | 0.040 | ||
| 1.7 | Linear poly rbf sigmoid | 0.598373 | 0.034895 | 0.025 |
| 0.699704 | 0.026132 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.735207 | 0.033558 | 0.031 | ||
| 0.750000 | 0.031968 | 0.000 |
Ensembles Classification result of the human-emotion data set
| Value I | Value II | Nearest neighbors | Statistical.Sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| AdaBoost | 0.676732 | 0.033831 | 0.025 |
| Gradient Boosting | 0.867582 | 0.034054 | 0.040 |
| Random Forest | 0.033210 | ||
| Extra Trees | 0.862424 | 0.026097 | 0.031 |
Fig. 9a Precision-Recall Cure for different value of AUC, (b) Precision-Recall Curve for Ensemble ROC, (c) ROC Curve of Human-Emotion Dataset, (d) Ensemble ROC Curve of Human-Emotion Dataset