| Literature DB >> 33780473 |
Weiwei Jiang1, Lun Liu1, Henglin Xiao1, Song Zhu1, Wentao Li1, Ying Liu1.
Abstract
With the development of a large number of tall dams and large cascade reservoir projects in the Lantsang River Basin, a largeEntities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33780473 PMCID: PMC8007002 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Location of the WLFZ study area (The SRTM 90m DEM map contained is provided by Geospatial Data Cloud site, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
(http://www.gscloud.cn).
Fig 2The workflow of photogrammetric processing based on Pix4dmapper software.
Fig 3The digital orthophoto maps and digital surface models of the study areas.
Vegetation types of each study area.
| Study area | Vegetation type |
|---|---|
| Huangdeng 1 | |
| Huangdeng 2 | |
| Nuozhadu | |
| Xiaowan |
Fig 4The ground truth reference of (a) Huangdeng 1, (b) Huangdeng 2, (c) Nuozhadu and (d) Xiaowan study area.
Fig 5The rule-based classification tree of (a) Huangdeng 1, (b) Huangdeng 2, (c) Nuozhadu and (d) Xiaowan study area.
Fig 6Classification results in the WLFZ of (a) Huangdeng study area 1, (b) Huangdeng study area 2, the (c) Nuozhadu study area, and the (d) Xiaowan study area.
Vegetation area, percentage and classification accuracy of WLFZs in each study area.
| Study area | Category | Area(㎡) | Percentage | Accuracy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| user | producer | OA | KIA | ||||||
| Huangdeng1 | Non-Veg | 7849.83 | 99.95% | 98.8% | 95.5% | 95.8% | 0.905 | ||
| Veg | 3.61 | 0.05% | 93.1% | 93.1% | |||||
| Huangdeng2 | Non-Veg | 1454.81 | 98.92% | 98.1% | 96.5% | 97.0% | 0.950 | ||
| Veg | 15.91 | 1.08% | 97.3% | 100% | |||||
| Nuozhadu | Non-Veg | 3067.43 | 37.56% | 93.9% | 98.8% | 94.1% | 0.912 | ||
| Veg | 62.44% | ||||||||
| Xiaowan | Non-Veg | 9895.38 | 54.5% | 99.1% | 100% | 98.7% | 0.981 | ||
| Veg | 45.50% | 97.8% | 99.4% | ||||||
| 98.6% | 96.1% | ||||||||
| 99.3% | 93.6% | ||||||||
Note: X. Sib (X. Sibiricum), A.Con (A. Conyzoides), C.Dac (C. Dactylon), E.Ind (E. Indica), P. Ple (P. Plebeium), C.Dac (C. Dactylon), Veg (Vegetation), Other-Veg (Other-Vegetation), Non-Veg (Non-Vegetation), OA (Overall Accuracy), KIA (kappa coefficient).
Fig 7Vegetation distribution area as a function of elevation in the WLFZ of (a) Huangdeng study area 1, (b) Huangdeng study area 2, the (c) Nuozhadu study area, and the (d) Xiaowan study area.
Fig 8Vegetation distributions as a function of distance to the nearest water body in the WLFZ of (a) Huangdeng study area 1, (b) Huangdeng study area 2, the (c) Nuozhadu study area, and the (d) Xiaowan study area.
The area, proportion and vegetation area, proportion and coverage of the WLFZ classified by slope in each study area in 2019.
| Study area | Category | Slope | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0°-8° | 8°-15° | 15°-25° | 25°-35° | 35°-60° | 60°-90° | ||
| Huangdeng1 | 1.76 | 0.77 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.18 | |
| 3096.85 | 1822.62 | 1162.75 | 780.43 | 498.09 | 492.70 | ||
| 39.43% | 23.21% | 14.81% | 9.94% | 6.34% | 6.27% | ||
| 48.76% | 21.24% | 12.58% | 7.62% | 4.68% | 5.11% | ||
| Coverage rate | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | |
| Huangdeng2 | 4.59 | 4.84 | 2.84 | 1.80 | 1.04 | 0.79 | |
| 421.35 | 426.57 | 315.09 | 184.80 | 84.01 | 38.80 | ||
| 28.65% | 29.00% | 21.42% | 12.57% | 5.72% | 2.64% | ||
| 28.86% | 30.45% | 17.86% | 11.34% | 6.55% | 4.94% | ||
| Coverage rate | 1.09% | 1.14% | 0.90% | 0.98% | 1.24% | 2.02% | |
| Nuozhadu | 1526.02 | 978.2 | 1079.57 | 679.86 | 664.91 | 170.3 | |
| 2137.43 | 1999.30 | 1584.51 | 1139.27 | 732.68 | 573.10 | ||
| 26.17% | 24.48% | 19.40% | 13.95% | 8.97% | 7.02% | ||
| 29.93% | 19.18% | 21.17% | 13.33% | 13.04% | 3.34% | ||
| Coverage rate | 71.40% | 48.93% | 68.13% | 59.68% | 90.75% | 29.72% | |
| Xiaowan | 2178.51 | 2753.80 | 2127.61 | 764.28 | 378.45 | 59.21 | |
| 3747.42 | 6473.32 | 4282.38 | 2264.39 | 1033.61 | 356.11 | ||
| 20.64% | 35.65% | 23.58% | 12.47% | 5.69% | 1.96% | ||
| 26.37% | 33.33% | 25.75% | 9.25% | 4.58% | 0.72% | ||
| Coverage rate | 58.13% | 42.54% | 49.68% | 33.75% | 36.61% | 16.63% | |
Fig 9Steep-slope WLFZs of Lantsang River.
Fig 10Vegetation distribution area as a function of aspect in the WLFZ of (a) Huangdeng study area 1, (b) Huangdeng study area 2, the (c) Nuozhadu study area, and the (d) Xiaowan study area.