Literature DB >> 33780449

Tuned inhibition in perceptual decision-making circuits can explain seemingly suboptimal confidence behavior.

Brian Maniscalco1,2, Brian Odegaard3,4, Piercesare Grimaldi5, Seong Hah Cho6, Michele A Basso5,7,8, Hakwan Lau4,6,8,9, Megan A K Peters1,2,4,10,11.   

Abstract

Current dominant views hold that perceptual confidence reflects the probability that a decision is correct. Although these views have enjoyed some empirical support, recent behavioral results indicate that confidence and the probability of being correct can be dissociated. An alternative hypothesis suggests that confidence instead reflects the magnitude of evidence in favor of a decision while being relatively insensitive to the evidence opposing the decision. We considered how this alternative hypothesis might be biologically instantiated by developing a simple neural network model incorporating a known property of sensory neurons: tuned inhibition. The key idea of the model is that the level of inhibition that each accumulator unit receives from units with the opposite tuning preference, i.e. its inhibition 'tuning', dictates its contribution to perceptual decisions versus confidence judgments, such that units with higher tuned inhibition (computing relative evidence for different perceptual interpretations) determine perceptual discrimination decisions, and units with lower tuned inhibition (computing absolute evidence) determine confidence. We demonstrate that this biologically plausible model can account for several counterintuitive findings reported in the literature where confidence and decision accuracy dissociate. By comparing model fits, we further demonstrate that a full complement of behavioral data across several previously published experimental results-including accuracy, reaction time, mean confidence, and metacognitive sensitivity-is best accounted for when confidence is computed from units without, rather than units with, tuned inhibition. Finally, we discuss predictions of our results and model for future neurobiological studies. These findings suggest that the brain has developed and implements this alternative, heuristic theory of perceptual confidence computation by relying on the diversity of neural resources available.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33780449     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  2 in total

1.  Sources of confidence in value-based choice.

Authors:  Jeroen Brus; Helena Aebersold; Marcus Grueschow; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Explaining distortions in metacognition with an attractor network model of decision uncertainty.

Authors:  Nadim A A Atiya; Quentin J M Huys; Raymond J Dolan; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.