| Literature DB >> 33779353 |
Chuan Wang1,2,3,4, Chen Jin5, Xiaofei Yin1,2,3,4, Jidong Liu1,2,3,4, Jinbo Liu1,2,3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of sarcopenia is high in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress and inflammation play important roles in the pathogenesis of sarcopenia in diabetes. Bilirubin has been shown to possess anti-oxidative activity. We aimed to explore the relationship between bilirubin and sarcopenia in patients with T2DM.Entities:
Keywords: Bilirubin; indirect bilirubin; oxidative stress; sarcopenia; skeletal muscle mass; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2021 PMID: 33779353 PMCID: PMC8010833 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211004226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
General characteristics of the study participants, categorized according to sex and the presence of sarcopenia.
| Characteristic | Men | Women | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarcopenia | Non-sarcopenia | P value | Sarcopenia | Non-sarcopenia | P value | |
| N | 51 | 73 |
| 38 | 89 | – |
| Age (years) | 62.61±6.93 | 59.68±5.97 |
| 65.32±6.22 | 61.40±6.47 |
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.13±2.94 | 28.07±3.23 |
| 22.29±2.83 | 25.96±3.65 |
|
| SBP (mmHg) | 131.86±20.01 | 137.22±19.68 | 0.141 | 136.87±23.30 | 140.16±17.10 | 0.377 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 76.10±10.94 | 81.11±11.02 |
| 75.03±12.41 | 77.91±10.88 | 0.192 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 7.69±2.91 | 8.20±2.62 | 0.317 | 8.53±2.84 | 8.11±2.89 | 0.463 |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.17±1.60 | 8.36±1.92 | 0.562 | 8.87±2.17 | 8.69±1.86 | 0.632 |
| Fasting C-peptide (ng/mL) | 0.93 (0.71–1.72) | 1.55 (1.00–2.09) |
| 1.23 (0.64–1.63) | 1.13 (0.71–1.71) | 0.836 |
| HOMA2-IR (units) | 0.80 (0.56–1.41) | 1.29 (0.79–1.92) |
| 1.02 (0.55–1.50) | 0.99 (0.57–1.46) | 0.945 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.32 (0.98–1.86) | 1.58 (1.19–2.28) |
| 1.46 (0.97–2.12) | 1.40 (1.06–1.95) | 0.941 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.13±0.95 | 4.49±1.01 | 0.050 | 5.09±1.06 | 4.68±1.01 |
|
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 72.64±17.54 | 74.51±19.63 | 0.590 | 55.37±15.66 | 56.03±12.88 | 0.803 |
| eGFR (mL/minute/1.73 m2) | 93.84±15.02 | 94.28±15.55 | 0.876 | 92.53±14.24 | 94.31±12.46 | 0.482 |
| SMI (kg/m2) | 6.33±0.48 | 7.72±0.58 |
| 4.88±0.30 | 6.14±0.65 |
|
| Body fat percentage (%) | 27.97±4.61 | 29.14±4.42 | 0.158 | 35.32±5.11 | 36.04±4.60 | 0.433 |
| Smoking (n, %) | 20 (39.2%) | 40 (54.8%) | 0.102 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.000 |
| AST (U/L) | 19.06±8.97 | 20.48±8.39 | 0.369 | 20.84±13.53 | 19.73±7.17 | 0.634 |
| ALT (U/L) | 19.12±13.20 | 22.51±13.09 | 0.160 | 16.74±12.33 | 19.72±12.13 | 0.209 |
| TBIL (µmol/L) | 11.19±4.94 | 12.32±4.69 | 0.199 | 10.25±4.64 | 9.73±4.13 | 0.530 |
| DBIL (µmol/L) | 3.86±1.60 | 3.94±1.45 | 0.763 | 3.56±2.05 | 3.23±1.15 | 0.265 |
| IBIL (µmol/L) | 7.33±3.48 | 8.37±3.42 | 0.099 | 6.70±3.14 | 6.49±3.07 | 0.729 |
Continuous data that were normally distributed or non-normally distributed are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or the median (interquartile range), respectively. Student’s t-test (normally distributed data) or Mann–Whitney U-test (non-normally distributed data) were used to compare differences between the two groups. Significant P values (< 0.05) are indicated in bold.
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HOMA2-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TBIL, total bilirubin; DBIL, direct bilirubin; IBIL, indirect bilirubin.
Figure 1.Pearson’s correlations between serum bilirubin concentrations and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) in men (a, b, c) and women (d, e, f).
Results of multiple linear regression analysis of the relationships between serum bilirubin concentration and SMI in men and women.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variable | β Coefficient (95% CI) |
| β Coefficient (95% CI) |
|
| Men | ||||
| TBIL | 0.038 (0.006–0.070) |
| 0.037 (0.005–0.070) |
|
| DBIL | 0.057 (−0.046–0.160) | 0.275 | 0.079 (−0.029–0.187) | 0.152 |
| IBIL | 0.063 (0.019–0.107) |
| 0.057 (0.013–0.101) |
|
| Women | ||||
| TBIL | 7.846E-5 (−0.034–0.034) | 0.996 | 0.006 (−0.027–0.039) | 0.729 |
| DBIL | −0.018 (−0.115–0.079) | 0.714 | 2.936E-5 (−0.095–0.096) | 1.000 |
| IBIL | 0.004 (−0.043–0.051) | 0.860 | 0.011 (−0.035–0.058) | 0.631 |
Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age, SBP, HbA1c, HOMA2-IR, TG, TC, eGFR, smoking, and body fat percentage.
SMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; CI, confidence interval; TBIL, total bilirubin; DBIL, direct bilirubin; IBIL, indirect bilirubin; SBP, systolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HOMA2-IR, homeostasis model assessment 2-insulin resistance; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Results of multiple logistic regression analysis of the relationships between serum bilirubin concentration and sarcopenia in men and women.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variable | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|
| Men | ||||
| Highest quartile of TBIL | 0.646 (0.273–1.530) | 0.321 | 0.424 (0.153–1.175) | 0.099 |
| Highest quartile of IBIL | 0.380 (0.155–0.933) |
| 0.243 (0.084–0.703) |
|
| Women | ||||
| Highest quartile of TBIL | 0.841 (0.348–2.031) | 0.700 | 0.825 (0.297–2.290) | 0.711 |
| Highest quartile of IBIL | 0.891 (0.367–2.159) | 0.798 | 0.829 (0.305–2.254) | 0.714 |
Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age, SBP, HbA1c, HOMA2-IR, TG, TC, eGFR, smoking, and body fat percentage.
CI, confidence interval; TBIL, total bilirubin; IBIL, indirect bilirubin; SBP, systolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HOMA2-IR, homeostasis model assessment 2-insulin resistance; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.