Sara Mirali1, Abrahim Abduelmula2, Asfandyar Mufti3, Muskaan Sachdeva1, Jensen Yeung3,4,5,6. 1. 12366 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada. 2. 70384 Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. 3. 12366 Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada. 4. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Probity Medical Research Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) are a heterogenous group of hereditary and acquired disorders that are characterized by excessive epidermal thickening of the palms and/or soles. PPK has been described as a rare adverse event for some medications. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize outcomes in PPK associated with various medications. This data will assist dermatologists and other healthcare providers treating patients with drug-induced PPK. METHODS: EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using the keyword "palmoplantar keratoderma." 40 studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients (mean age: 57.0 years) were included in the analysis. Among patients whose sex was reported, 60.3% (n = 35/58) were male. PPK most frequently developed after treatment with BRAF inhibitors (73.7%, n = 182/247), BRAF inhibitors combined with MEK1/2 inhibitors (15.4%, n = 38/247), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (3.2%, n = 8/247), or chemotherapy (2.4%, n = 6/247). The mean latency period between initiation of the drug and onset of PPK was 7.6 months (range: 0.25-90 months). Improvement of PPK was reported in 24 cases, with 50% (n = 12/24) achieving complete resolution and 50% (n = 12/24) achieving partial resolution. All patients who achieved complete resolution stopped the suspected drug, with a mean resolution period of 2.4 months (range: 2 weeks-6 months). The most common treatments for PPK were keratolytic treatments (n = 10) and topical corticosteroids (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: PPK was most frequently associated with targeted kinase inhibitors, specifically BRAF, MEK1/2, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) are a heterogenous group of hereditary and acquired disorders that are characterized by excessive epidermal thickening of the palms and/or soles. PPK has been described as a rare adverse event for some medications. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize outcomes in PPK associated with various medications. This data will assist dermatologists and other healthcare providers treating patients with drug-induced PPK. METHODS: EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using the keyword "palmoplantar keratoderma." 40 studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients (mean age: 57.0 years) were included in the analysis. Among patients whose sex was reported, 60.3% (n = 35/58) were male. PPK most frequently developed after treatment with BRAF inhibitors (73.7%, n = 182/247), BRAF inhibitors combined with MEK1/2 inhibitors (15.4%, n = 38/247), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (3.2%, n = 8/247), or chemotherapy (2.4%, n = 6/247). The mean latency period between initiation of the drug and onset of PPK was 7.6 months (range: 0.25-90 months). Improvement of PPK was reported in 24 cases, with 50% (n = 12/24) achieving complete resolution and 50% (n = 12/24) achieving partial resolution. All patients who achieved complete resolution stopped the suspected drug, with a mean resolution period of 2.4 months (range: 2 weeks-6 months). The most common treatments for PPK were keratolytic treatments (n = 10) and topical corticosteroids (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: PPK was most frequently associated with targeted kinase inhibitors, specifically BRAF, MEK1/2, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) are a heterogenous group of hereditary and acquired disorders
that are characterized by excessive epidermal thickening of the palms and/or soles. PPK has
recently been described as a rare cutaneous complication of some medications and can
significantly impact patients’ quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to
summarize outcomes in PPK associated with various medications.EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched on October 21, 2020 in accordance with PRISMA
guidelines using the keyword “palmoplantar keratoderma” (Supplemental Figures S1-S2, Supplemental Table S1). Of the 40 studies (23 case
reports, 9 case series, 6 cohort studies, and 2 randomized controlled trial) that met the
inclusion criteria, a total of 247 patients (mean age: 57.0 years) were included. Among
patients whose sex was reported, 60.3% (n = 35/58) were male (Supplemental Table S2). PPK most frequently developed after treatment with BRAF
inhibitors (73.7%, n = 182/247), BRAF inhibitors combined with MEK1/2 inhibitors (15.4%,
n = 38/247), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (3.2%, n = 8/247),
or chemotherapy (2.4%, n = 6/247).The mean latency period between initiation of the drug and onset of PPK was 7.6 months
(range: 0.25-90 months) (Supplemental Table S3). Of the 24 cases that reported improvement of PPK, 50.0%
(n = 12/24) had complete and 50.0% (n = 12/24) had partial
resolution. All patients who achieved complete resolution stopped the suspected drug and the
mean resolution period was 2.4 months. Among those with partial resolution, the drug was
discontinued in 41.7% (n = 5/12) of cases and continued in 25.0%
(n = 3/12). One patient who did not discontinue the drug was treated with
systemic corticosteroids, achieving partial resolution in 4 months. The overall mean
resolution period for patients achieving partial resolution was 3.0 months. Treatments for PPK
included keratolytic treatments (n = 10), topical corticosteroids
(n = 4), systemic corticosteroids (n = 4), antihistamines
(n = 2), and retinoids (n = 2).PPK was most frequently associated with BRAF inhibitors, which are used to target
malignancies harboring BRAF mutations. Pharmacological inhibition of BRAF
signaling in normal skin cells increases MAPK/ERK (mitogen-activated protein
kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase) signaling through CRAF, resulting in increased
keratinocyte proliferation.[1] To reduce the risk of PPK and other proliferative cutaneous side effects, BRAF
inhibitors can be paired with MEK1/2 inhibitors to block MAPK/ERK signaling downstream.
Several studies showed a reduction in PPK occurrence when BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors were used
in combination.[2-4] PPK also occurred after treatment with chemotherapy, such as capecitabine. While the
pathogenesis is unknown, one theory suggests that capecitabine is eliminated by the eccrine
system, resulting in off-target toxicity in the palm and soles.[5] However, further studies need to investigate why keratinocytes are unaffected by
capecitabine’s main metabolite, 5-fluorouracil, which blocks DNA synthesis and cell
proliferation.Our systematic review has some limitations. The majority of the included studies were case
reports or case series, which limits the generalizability of our analysis. In addition, the
mean Naranjo score was 5, which suggests a “probable” association between initiation of the
suspected drug and development of PPK. Despite these limitations, our review provides
important information about the occurrence of PPK as an adverse drug reaction, most commonly
noted with BRAF inhibitors.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, Supplementary material, for Drugs Associated With the Development
of Palmoplantar Keratoderma: A Systematic Review by Sara Mirali, Abrahim Abduelmula,
Asfandyar Mufti, Muskaan Sachdeva and Jensen Yeung in Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and
Surgery
Authors: Reinhard Dummer; Paolo A Ascierto; Helen J Gogas; Ana Arance; Mario Mandala; Gabriella Liszkay; Claus Garbe; Dirk Schadendorf; Ivana Krajsova; Ralf Gutzmer; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Caroline Dutriaux; Jan Willem B de Groot; Naoya Yamazaki; Carmen Loquai; Laure A Moutouh-de Parseval; Michael D Pickard; Victor Sandor; Caroline Robert; Keith T Flaherty Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Emily Y Chu; Karolyn A Wanat; Christopher J Miller; Ravi K Amaravadi; Leslie A Fecher; Marcia S Brose; Suzanne McGettigan; Lydia R Giles; Lynn M Schuchter; John T Seykora; Misha Rosenbach Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: N P Graf; P Koelblinger; N Galliker; S Conrad; M Barysch; J Mangana; R Dummer; P F Cheng; S M Goldinger Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2018-12-13 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: G V Long; K T Flaherty; D Stroyakovskiy; H Gogas; E Levchenko; F de Braud; J Larkin; C Garbe; T Jouary; A Hauschild; V Chiarion-Sileni; C Lebbe; M Mandalà; M Millward; A Arance; I Bondarenko; J B A G Haanen; J Hansson; J Utikal; V Ferraresi; P Mohr; V Probachai; D Schadendorf; P Nathan; C Robert; A Ribas; M A Davies; S R Lane; J J Legos; B Mookerjee; J-J Grob Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 32.976