Literature DB >> 3377928

Comparison of the recovery characteristics of diazepam and midazolam.

D Galletly1, P Forrest, G Purdie.   

Abstract

A double-blind crossover comparison of efficacy and recovery from midazolam 5 mg and diazepam (in propylene glycol) 10 mg was undertaken in eight volunteer subjects. It was found that midazolam was significantly more potent in this dose ratio than diazepam, helping to explain the finding of previous studies that the recovery from midazolam and diazepam in a 1:2 dose ratio is comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3377928     DOI: 10.1093/bja/60.5.520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  3 in total

1.  The effects of low-dose midazolam for induction of high-dose fentanyl anesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft.

Authors:  Noriaki Kanaya; Satoshi Fujita; Hideaki Tsuchida; Sumihiko Seki; Akiyoshi Namiki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Small bolus injections of intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 788 consecutive cases.

Authors:  M R Smith; G D Bell; M A Quine; G M Spencer; A E Morden; J G Jones
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparison of alfentanil-midazolam and meperidine-diazepam.

Authors:  M B Donnelly; W A Scott; D S Daly
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.063

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.