Literature DB >> 33778749

1H MR Spectroscopy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens for the Discrimination of Breast Cancer.

Richard A Komoroski1, Jing-Huei Lee1, Jeffrey A Welge1, Jonathan A Dudley1, Wen-Jang Chu1, Mary C Mahoney1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether MR spectroscopic assessment of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy specimens from suspicious breast lesions could be used to improve the diagnostic utility of FNA biopsies for the characterization of breast lesions. Materials and
Methods: In this prospective study, a previously reported technique using high-spatial-resolution proton MR spectroscopy was modified and used to examine the utility of FNA biopsies in the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions. Tissue samples from 115 lesions (from 102 women; average age, 54 years) were excised by using FNA and core biopsies and were collected between September 7, 2012, and April 11, 2014. Histologic results from core biopsy specimens determined the lesions to be benign (n = 55), invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 51), invasive lobular carcinoma (n = 5), or ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 4). Measures of phosphocholine (PC), glycerophosphocholine, and choline relative to each other and to total creatine (tCr) were obtained from usable spectra. Planned comparisons among lesion groups were carried out using t test contrasts, and differences of each contrast level from zero were judged significant when the two-tailed P value was less than .05.
Results: Of the 115 samples, 69 (60%) yielded no usable MR spectra. Analysis of the 46 with usable spectra found that only the difference in PC/tCr between benign and cancer lesions was statistically significant (P = .028).
Conclusion: Given that 60% of FNA biopsy specimens yielded no usable spectra and that results were largely inconclusive when derived from usable spectra, the combined MR and FNA technique, as modified and implemented in this study, is of little value for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.Keywords: Breast, MR-Spectroscopy, Neoplasms-Primary© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33778749      PMCID: PMC7983769          DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020200033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer        ISSN: 2638-616X


  17 in total

Review 1.  Tumour phospholipid metabolism.

Authors:  F Podo
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Multiparametric MRI of the breast: A review.

Authors:  Maria Adele Marino; Thomas Helbich; Pascal Baltzer; Katja Pinker-Domenig
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Metabolite quantification and high-field MRS in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ihab S Haddadin; Adeka McIntosh; Sina Meisamy; Curt Corum; Angela L Styczynski Snyder; Nathaniel J Powell; Michael T Nelson; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood; Patrick J Bolan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Malignant transformation alters membrane choline phospholipid metabolism of human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  E O Aboagye; Z M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  1H NMR analysis of choline metabolites in fine-needle-aspirate biopsies of breast cancer.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Mary C Mahoney; Jing-Huei Lee; Wen-Jang Chu; Kim M Cecil; Stephen M Strakowski; Richard A Komoroski
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  E Warner; D B Plewes; R S Shumak; G C Catzavelos; L S Di Prospero; M J Yaffe; V Goel; E Ramsay; P L Chart; D E Cole; G A Taylor; M Cutrara; T H Samuels; J P Murphy; J M Murphy; S A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw; Andrea F Abramson; Lee K Tan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Molecular causes of the aberrant choline phospholipid metabolism in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristine Glunde; Chunfa Jie; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Distinct choline metabolic profiles are associated with differences in gene expression for basal-like and luminal-like breast cancer xenograft models.

Authors:  Siver A Moestue; Eldrid Borgan; Else M Huuse; Evita M Lindholm; Beathe Sitter; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Olav Engebraaten; Gunhild M Maelandsmo; Ingrid S Gribbestad
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.