Literature DB >> 33778662

Type II Endoleak Nidus Volume on Arterial and Delayed Phases of Initial CT Angiography after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Predicts Persistent Endoleak and Aneurysm Sac Enlargement.

Hyeon Yu1, Joshua S Ellis1, Lauren M B Burke1, Ari J Isaacson1, Charles T Burke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate type II endoleak nidus volume (ENV) in the arterial phase (ENVAP) and delayed phase (ENVDP) of the first postoperative CT angiography (CTA) as a predictor of persistent endoleak and aneurysm sac enlargement at follow-up CTA in patients with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 72 years ± 8; range, 56-88 years) with EVAR and type II endoleak were included in a single-institution retrospective study conducted between March 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. ENVAP, ENVDP, change of volume (ENVDP-AP), and percentage of ENVAP and ENVDP in aneurysm sac volume (ASV) (ENVAP/ASV%, ENVDP/ASV%, respectively) were measured on first postoperative CTA images. The mean follow-up was 31.6 months ± 26.6 (range, 6-163.8 months). Patients were divided into two groups (group A, spontaneous resolution of endoleak without intervention [n = 29] and group B, persistent endoleak at follow-up CTA [n = 64]) and compared by using the Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank, and Pearson χ2 tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare accuracies of parameters at first postoperative CTA.
RESULTS: The accuracy of ENVDP (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.78) was superior to the accuracy of ENVDP/ASV% (AUC, 0.76), ENVDP-AP (AUC, 0.74), ENVAP (AUC, 0.71), and ENVAP/ASV% (AUC, 0.69) in indicating persistent endoleak. In group B, 46 patients (72%) showed ASV enlargement and 44 patients (69%) underwent endoleak embolization. ENVAP (1.7 cm3 ± 2.9 vs 3.4 cm3 ± 4.2; P = .001), ENVDP (2.9 cm3 ± 3.8 vs 8.0 cm3 ± 9.6; P < .001), ENVDP-AP (1.1 cm3 ± 1.8 vs 4.5 cm3 ± 7.8; P < .001), ENVAP/ASV% (0.9% ± 1.5 vs 1.7% ± 2.2; P = .003), and ENVDP/ASV% (1.6% ± 2.2 vs 3.7% ± 3.6; P < .001) were smaller in group A than in group B.
CONCLUSION: ENVDP of the first postoperative CTA is an accurate predictor of persistent endoleak compared with ENVAP, and persistent endoleak is associated with aneurysm sac enlargement, in which earlier intervention is recommended.© RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33778662      PMCID: PMC7977951          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2021200527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  31 in total

1.  The significance and management of the leaking endograft.

Authors:  G R Jacobowitz; R J Rosen; T S Riles
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions.

Authors:  Alla M Rozenblit; Michael Patlas; Ayala T Rosenbaum; Takao Okhi; Frank J Veith; Mitchell P Laks; Zina J Ricci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Pre-operative Aneurysm Thrombus Volume, But Not Density, Predicts Type 2 Endoleak Rate Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Ben Li; Janice Montbriand; Naomi Eisenberg; Graham Roche-Nagle; Kong Teng Tan; John Byrne
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 1.466

4.  Clinical significance of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Dmitri V Gelfand; Geoffrey H White; Samuel E Wilson
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.466

5.  Can early computed tomography angiography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair predict the need for reintervention in patients with type II endoleak?

Authors:  O Dudeck; D Schnapauff; L Herzog; D Löwenthal; K Bulla; B Bulla; Z Halloul; F Meyer; M Pech; B Gebauer; J Ricke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Monique Prinssen; Eric L G Verhoeven; Jaap Buth; Philippe W M Cuypers; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Ron Balm; Erik Buskens; Diederick E Grobbee; Jan D Blankensteijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Persistent type II endoleak after EVAR: the predictive value of the AAA thrombus volume.

Authors:  Enrico Gallitto; Mauro Gargiulo; Chiara Mascoli; Antonio Freyrie; Massimo DE Matteis; Carla Serra; Claudio Bianchini Massoni; Gianluca Faggioli; Andrea Stella
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 1.888

8.  Aneurysm sac failure to regress after endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with lower long-term survival.

Authors:  Thomas F X O'Donnell; Sarah E Deery; Laura T Boitano; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Marc L Schermerhorn; Salvatore T Scali; Andres Schanzer; Robert T Lancaster; Virendra I Patel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Volumetric quantification of type II endoleaks: an indicator for aneurysm sac growth following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Shadpour Demehri; Jason Signorelli; Kanako K Kumamaru; Nicole Wake; Elizabeth George; Michael Hanley; Michael L Steigner; Michael L Steinger; Edwin Charles Gravereaux; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Imaging-Based Predictors of Persistent Type II Endoleak After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Rafael Mursalin; Ichiro Sakamoto; Hiroki Nagayama; Eijun Sueyoshi; Kazuyoshi Tanigawa; Takashi Miura; Masataka Uetani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.