Literature DB >> 33778635

Undetected Lung Cancer at Posteroanterior Chest Radiography: Potential Role of a Deep Learning-based Detection Algorithm.

Ju Gang Nam1, Eui Jin Hwang1, Da Som Kim1, Seung-Jin Yoo1, Hyewon Choi1, Jin Mo Goo1, Chang Min Park1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based algorithm in detecting lung cancers not reported on posteroanterior chest radiographs during routine practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective test dataset included 168 posteroanterior chest radiographs acquired between March 2017 and December 2018 (168 patients; mean age, 71.9 years ± 9.5 [standard deviation]; age range, 42-91 years) with 187 lung cancers (mean size, 2.3 cm ± 1.2) undetected during initial clinical evaluation, and 50 normal chest radiographs. CT served as the reference standard for ground truth. Four thoracic radiologists independently reevaluated the chest radiographs for lung nodules both without and with the aid of the algorithm. The performances of the algorithm and the radiologists were evaluated and compared on a per-chest radiograph basis and a per-lesion basis, according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the jackknife free-response ROC curve (AUFROC).
RESULTS: The algorithm showed excellent diagnostic performances both in terms of per-chest radiograph classification (AUROC, 0.899) and per-lesion localization (AUFROC, 0.744); both of these values were significantly higher than those of the radiologists (AUROC, 0.634-0.663; AUFROC, 0.619-0.651; P < .001 for all). The algorithm also demonstrated higher sensitivity (69.6% [117 of 168] vs 47.0% [316 of 672]; P < .001) and specificity (94.0% [47 of 50] vs 78.0% [156 of 200]; P = .01). When assisted by the algorithm, the radiologists' AUROC (0.634-0.663 vs 0.685-0.724; P < 0.01 for all) and pooled AUFROC (0.636 vs 0.688; P = .03) substantially improved. The false-positive rate of the algorithm, that is, the total number of false-positive nodules divided by the total number of chest radiographs, was similar to that of pooled radiologists (21.1% [46 of 218] vs 19.0% [166 of 872]; P > .05).
CONCLUSION: A deep learning-based nodule detection algorithm showed excellent detection performance of lung cancers that were not reported on chest radiographs during routine practice and significantly reduced reading errors when used as a second reader.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020See also commentary by White in this issue. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33778635      PMCID: PMC7977930          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020190222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  21 in total

1.  Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules and small tumours on chest radiographs.

Authors:  D W De Boo; M Prokop; M Uffmann; B van Ginneken; C M Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Use of a computer-aided detection system to detect missed lung cancer at chest radiography.

Authors:  Charles S White; Thomas Flukinger; Jean Jeudy; Joseph J Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography: imaging and medicolegal issues.

Authors:  C S White; A I Salis; C A Meyer
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Computer-aided detection improves detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs beyond the support by bone-suppressed images.

Authors:  Steven Schalekamp; Bram van Ginneken; Emmeline Koedam; Miranda M Snoeren; Audrey M Tiehuis; Rianne Wittenberg; Nico Karssemeijer; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-21

Review 7.  Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Joshua N Mirkin; Thomas K Oliver; Christopher G Azzoli; Donald A Berry; Otis W Brawley; Tim Byers; Graham A Colditz; Michael K Gould; James R Jett; Anita L Sabichi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Douglas E Wood; Amir Qaseem; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Computer-aided detection of lung cancer on chest radiographs: effect on observer performance.

Authors:  Bartjan de Hoop; Diederik W De Boo; Hester A Gietema; Frans van Hoorn; Banafsche Mearadji; Laura Schijf; Bram van Ginneken; Mathias Prokop; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Missed non-small cell lung cancer: radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retrospect.

Authors:  Priya Kumar Shah; John H M Austin; Charles S White; Pavni Patel; Linda B Haramati; Gregory D N Pearson; Maria C Shiau; Yahya M Berkmen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection Algorithm for Major Thoracic Diseases on Chest Radiographs.

Authors:  Eui Jin Hwang; Sunggyun Park; Kwang-Nam Jin; Jung Im Kim; So Young Choi; Jong Hyuk Lee; Jin Mo Goo; Jaehong Aum; Jae-Joon Yim; Julien G Cohen; Gilbert R Ferretti; Chang Min Park
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Normal blindness: when we Look But Fail To See.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Anna Kosovicheva; Benjamin Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 24.482

2.  A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Transformed Health Ecosystems.

Authors:  Kerstin Denecke; Claude R Baudoin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 3.  Applications of artificial intelligence in the thorax: a narrative review focusing on thoracic radiology.

Authors:  Yisak Kim; Ji Yoon Park; Eui Jin Hwang; Sang Min Lee; Chang Min Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Reevaluation of missed lung cancer with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Serge Sicular; Mehmet Alpaslan; Francis A Ortega; Nora Keathley; Srivas Venkatesh; Rebecca M Jones; Robert V Lindsey
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.