Literature DB >> 33778579

Value of Machine Learning-based Coronary CT Fractional Flow Reserve Applied to Triple-Rule-Out CT Angiography in Acute Chest Pain.

Simon S Martin1, Domenico Mastrodicasa1, Marly van Assen1, Carlo N De Cecco1, Richard R Bayer1, Christian Tesche1, Akos Varga-Szemes1, Andreas M Fischer1, Brian E Jacobs1, Pooyan Sahbaee1, L Parkwood Griffith1, Andrew J Matuskowitz1, Thomas J Vogl1, U Joseph Schoepf1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the additional value of noninvasive artificial intelligence (AI)-based CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT FFR), derived from triple-rule-out coronary CT angiography for acute chest pain (ACP) in the emergency department (ED) setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: AI-based CT FFR from triple-rule-out CT angiography data sets was retrospectively obtained in 159 of 271 eligible patients (102 men; mean age, 57.0 years ± 9.7 [standard deviation]) presenting to the ED with ACP. The agreement between CT FFR (≤ 0.80) and stenosis at triple-rule-out CT angiography (≥ 50%), as well as downstream cardiac diagnostic testing, was investigated. Furthermore, the predictive value of CT FFR for coronary revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was assessed over a 1-year follow-up period.
RESULTS: CT FFR and triple-rule-out CT angiography demonstrated agreement in severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 52% (82 of 159) of all cases. CT FFR of 0.80 and less served as a better predictor for coronary revascularization and MACE than stenosis of 50% and greater at triple-rule-out CT angiography (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.4, 8.2 vs odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.9, 5.3) (P < .01). In the subgroup of patients with additional noninvasive cardiac testing (94 of 159), there was higher agreement as to the presence or absence of significant disease with CT FFR (55%) than with coronary triple-rule-out CT angiography (47%) (P = .23).
CONCLUSION: CT FFR derived from triple-rule-out CT angiography was a better predictor for coronary revascularization and MACE and showed better agreement with additional diagnostic testing than triple-rule-out CT angiography. Therefore, CT FFR may improve the specificity in identifying patients with ACP with significant CAD in the ED setting and reduce unnecessary downstream testing.© RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Ihdayhid and Ben Zekry in this issue. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33778579      PMCID: PMC7978005          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020190137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  35 in total

1.  Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm.

Authors:  Adriaan Coenen; Marisa M Lubbers; Akira Kurata; Atsushi Kono; Admir Dedic; Raluca G Chelu; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Frank J Gijsen; Mohamed Ouhlous; Robert-Jan M van Geuns; Koen Nieman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Harold I Litt; Constantine Gatsonis; Brad Snyder; Harjit Singh; Chadwick D Miller; Daniel W Entrikin; James M Leaming; Laurence J Gavin; Charissa B Pacella; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Bernard De Bruyne; Gianluca Pontone; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Mark A Hlatky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Effect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the prospective multicenter international DISCOVER-FLOW study.

Authors:  James K Min; Bon-Kwon Koo; Andrejs Erglis; Joon-Hyung Doh; David V Daniels; Sanda Jegere; Hyo-Soo Kim; Allison Dunning; Tony Defrance; Jonathan Leipsic
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2012-04-27

6.  The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge.

Authors:  Simon A Mahler; Robert F Riley; Brian C Hiestand; Gregory B Russell; James W Hoekstra; Cedric W Lefebvre; Bret A Nicks; David M Cline; Kim L Askew; Stephanie B Elliott; David M Herrington; Gregory L Burke; Chadwick D Miller
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-03-03

7.  Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  E Nagel; H B Lehmkuhl; W Bocksch; C Klein; U Vogel; E Frantz; A Ellmer; S Dreysse; E Fleck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).

Authors:  Bjarne L Nørgaard; Jonathon Leipsic; Sara Gaur; Sujith Seneviratne; Brian S Ko; Hiroshi Ito; Jesper M Jensen; Laura Mauri; Bernard De Bruyne; Hiram Bezerra; Kazuhiro Osawa; Mohamed Marwan; Christoph Naber; Andrejs Erglis; Seung-Jung Park; Evald H Christiansen; Anne Kaltoft; Jens F Lassen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision.

Authors:  Hein J Verberne; Wanda Acampa; Constantinos Anagnostopoulos; Jim Ballinger; Frank Bengel; Pieter De Bondt; Ronny R Buechel; Alberto Cuocolo; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Albert Flotats; Marcus Hacker; Cecilia Hindorf; Philip A Kaufmann; Oliver Lindner; Michael Ljungberg; Markus Lonsdale; Alain Manrique; David Minarik; Arthur J H A Scholte; Riemer H J A Slart; Elin Trägårdh; Tim C de Wit; Birger Hesse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Gianluca Pontone; Mark A Hlatky; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Current and Future Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Nitesh Gautam; Prachi Saluja; Abdallah Malkawi; Mark G Rabbat; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Gianluca Pontone; Yiye Zhang; Benjamin C Lee; Subhi J Al'Aref
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.