Literature DB >> 33778521

Myocardial Stress Perfusion MRI Using Regadenoson: A Weight-based Approach in Infants and Young Children.

James C Wilkinson1, Tam T Doan1, Robert W Loar1, Amol S Pednekar1, Premal M Trivedi1, Prakash M Masand1, Cory V Noel1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of stress cardiac MRI by using weight-based dosing of regadenoson in patients less than 40 kg and whether stress cardiac MRI affects patient management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients less than 40 kg undergoing stress cardiac MRI by using weight-based dosing (8 μg/kg) of regadenoson were included in this retrospective single-center study. Hemodynamic response, adverse events, and cardiac MRI abnormalities in myocardial perfusion, wall motion, and delayed enhancement were evaluated. Patient management based on the results of the stress cardiac MRI were evaluated.
RESULTS: Forty-six consecutive stress cardiac MRI examinations were performed in 36 patients (median age, 9.0 years; age range, 2 months to 13.9 years) with congenital and acquired heart disease. Thirty-one of 46 (67.4%) studies were performed with the use of sedation. A myocardial perfusion defect was present in 20 of 46 (43.5%) studies, five with inducible defects only, and the remaining 15 with fixed or irreversible defects. In the 46 total studies, there were no major adverse events and nine (19.6%) minor adverse events including emesis (n = 1) and transient hypotension requiring pharmacologic intervention in eight patients who were all sedated. Sedation was an independent predictor for hypotension (P =.040). Twenty-six negative studies had no coronary interventions performed, and of the 20 positive studies, 15 were referred for catheterization, eight of which underwent coronary interventions.
CONCLUSION: Weight-based dosing of regadenoson for stress cardiac MRI was safe and feasible in infants and young children and played an integral role in the outcome and treatment decisions for children with coronary artery disease.© RSNA, 2019. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33778521      PMCID: PMC7977799          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2019190061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  26 in total

1.  A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A-receptor agonist, in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Toufigh Gordi; Paul Frohna; Hai-Ling Sun; Andrew Wolff; Luiz Belardinelli; Hsiao Lieu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Use of regadenoson for measurement of fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Aditya Prasad; Meena Zareh; Reece Doherty; Ambarish Gopal; Hita Vora; Keith Somma; Anilkumar Mehra; Leonardo C Clavijo; Ray V Matthews; David M Shavelle
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  MR myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Otavio R Coelho-Filho; Carsten Rickers; Raymond Y Kwong; Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Comparison of propofol versus ketamine for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  S Lebovic; D L Reich; L G Steinberg; F P Vela; G Silvay
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Safety and Indications in Pediatrics and Young Adults.

Authors:  David M Biko; R Thomas Collins; Sara L Partington; Matthew Harris; Kevin K Whitehead; Marc S Keller; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Myocardial stress perfusion magnetic resonance: initial experience in a pediatric and young adult population using regadenoson.

Authors:  Cory V Noel; Ramkumar Krishnamurthy; Brady Moffett; Rajesh Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-12-29

7.  Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Luiz Belardinelli; Brent Blackburn; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert C Hendel; Hsiao Lieu; John J Mahmarian; Ann Olmsted; S Richard Underwood; João Vitola; Whedy Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Regadenoson induces comparable left ventricular perfusion defects as adenosine: a quantitative analysis from the ADVANCE MPI 2 trial.

Authors:  John J Mahmarian; Manuel D Cerqueira; Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Gregory S Thomas; Robert C Hendel; Lemuel A Moye; Ann W Olmsted
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-08

Review 9.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran R Nandalur; Ben A Dwamena; Asim F Choudhri; Mohan R Nandalur; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Clinical validation of free breathing respiratory triggered retrospectively cardiac gated cine balanced steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance in sedated children.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamurthy; Amol Pednekar; Lamya A Atweh; Esben Vogelius; Zili David Chu; Wei Zhang; Shiraz Maskatia; Prakash Masand; Shaine A Morris; Ramkumar Krishnamurthy; Raja Muthupillai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hemodynamic and Respiratory Effects of Regadenoson During Radiologic Imaging in Infants and Children.

Authors:  Brian Schloss; Ismail Bekiroglu; Colin O'Connor; Simon Lee; Julie Rice; Stephani S Kim; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2021-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.