Literature DB >> 33778516

Accuracy of Non-Electrocardiographically Gated Thoracic CT Angiography for Right Atrial and Right Ventricular Enlargement.

Zachary Nuffer1, Timothy M Baran1, Vijay Krishnamoorthy1, Katherine Kaproth-Joslin1, Abhishek Chaturvedi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the role of long-axis (LA) and short-axis (SA) measurements of the right atrium (RA) and right ventricle (RV) at non-electrocardiographically (ECG) gated thoracic CT angiography for identification of RA enlargement and RV enlargement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective case review of 138 patients who underwent both non-ECG-gated CT angiography and ECG-gated CT angiography concurrently from November 2016 through November 2018. The SA and LA of the RA and RV were measured by two observers blinded to the ECG-gated CT angiography data. ECG-gated CT angiography-derived RA end-systolic and RV end-diastolic volumes were used as standard of reference to derive cutoff values for diagnosis of RA and RV enlargement.
RESULTS: In this study, 138 patients were evaluated (70 men, 68 women; mean age, 70.0 years ± 18.4 [standard deviation]; mean body mass index, 29.3 kg/m2 ± 8.1). Of these patients, ECG-gated CT angiography revealed 36.2% had RA enhancement and 19.0% had RV enhancement. The best predictor of RA enhancement was the product of atrial LA and SA measurements, for which a threshold value of 3210 mm2 yielded a 94% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity (area under the curve [AUC], 0.92). A threshold of 55.5 mm for LA diameter had 86% sensitivity and 78.4% specificity in identifying RA enlargement. RV enlargement could be predicted if the SA diameter was greater than 48.5 mm (76.9% sensitivity and 64.9% specificity) and with a body surface area indexed value of 27.0 mm/m2 (92.3% sensitivity and 74.8% specificity [AUC, 0.87]).
CONCLUSION: RA and RV enlargement can be accurately diagnosed by using non-ECG-gated CT angiography.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33778516      PMCID: PMC7977741          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2019190008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  29 in total

1.  Right ventricular function and failure: report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group on cellular and molecular mechanisms of right heart failure.

Authors:  Norbert F Voelkel; Robert A Quaife; Leslie A Leinwand; Robyn J Barst; Michael D McGoon; Daniel R Meldrum; Jocelyn Dupuis; Carlin S Long; Lewis J Rubin; Frank W Smart; Yuichiro J Suzuki; Mark Gladwin; Elizabeth M Denholm; Dorothy B Gail
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Imaging-based right-atrial anatomy by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography: correlations with anatomic specimens.

Authors:  Francesco Fulvio Faletra; Stefano Muzzarelli; Maria Cristina Dequarti; Romina Murzilli; Roberto Bellu; Siew Yen Ho
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Normal Reference Values of Biventricular Size and Function in Male Athlete's Heart.

Authors:  Flavio D'Ascenzi; Francesca Anselmi; Pietro Piu; Caterina Fiorentini; Salvatore Francesco Carbone; Luca Volterrani; Marta Focardi; Marco Bonifazi; Sergio Mondillo
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-12-12

4.  Application of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Image Guidance to WATCHMAN Implantation and Impact on Early Operator Learning Curve: Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Dee Dee Wang; Marvin Eng; Daniel Kupsky; Eric Myers; Michael Forbes; Mehnaz Rahman; Mohammad Zaidan; Sachin Parikh; Janet Wyman; Milan Pantelic; Thomas Song; Jeff Nadig; Patrick Karabon; Adam Greenbaum; William O'Neill
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Cardiac volumetry in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a comparative study correlating multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance tomography. Reasons for intermodal disagreement.

Authors:  Janina Schroeder; Andreas Peterschroeder; Bernhard Vaske; Thomas Butz; Peter Barth; Olaf Oldenburg; Thomas Bitter; Wolfgang Burchert; Dieter Horstkotte; Christoph Langer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Evaluation of left atrial volumes using multidetector computed tomography: comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Sang Jin Kim; Tae Hoon Kim; Sang Min Lee; Yoo Jin Hong; Se-Joong Rim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Sex-Specific Chest CT Measurements Compared With Cardiac MRI Findings in the Assessment of Cardiac Chamber Enlargement.

Authors:  Diego A Eifer; Elsie T Nguyen; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Kate Hanneman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Reference values for and determinants of right atrial area in healthy adults by 2-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Ekkehard Grünig; Philipp Henn; Antonello D'Andrea; Martin Claussen; Nicola Ehlken; Felicitas Maier; Robert Naeije; Christian Nagel; Felix Prange; Johannes Weidenhammer; Christine Fischer; Eduardo Bossone
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines.

Authors:  Michael Rose; Bernard Rubal; Edward Hulten; Jennifer N Slim; Kevin Steel; James L Furgerson; Todd C Villines; Ahmad M Slim
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.