Literature DB >> 33778500

Stress Myocardial Perfusion PET Provides Incremental Risk Prediction in Patients with and Patients without Diabetes.

Hicham Skali1, Marcelo F Di Carli1, Ron Blankstein1, Benjamin J Chow1, Rob S Beanlands1, Daniel S Berman1, Guido Germano1, James K Min1, Michael Merhige1, Brent Williams1, Emir Veledar1, Leslee J Shaw1, Sharmila Dorbala1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion PET in patients with and patients without diabetes mellitus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from a multicenter registry cohort of 7061 patients, including 1966 with diabetes mellitus, who underwent clinically indicated rest-stress rubidium 82 (82Rb) myocardial perfusion PET. The mean patient age (±standard deviation) was 63.3 years ± 13. Of the 7061 patients, 3348 were women (47.4%), 2296 (32.5%) had known coronary artery disease, and 1895 (26.8%) had previously undergone revascularization. The primary end point was cardiac death (n = 169) assessed at a mean of 2.5 years ± 1.5. The authors used Cox proportional hazards models and risk reclassification measures stratified according to diabetes status.
RESULTS: In multivariable models adjusting for established clinical predictors, increasing magnitude of stress myocardial perfusion abnormality was associated with greater risk of cardiac death in patients with diabetes (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1, 16.8) for severely abnormal myocardium compared with normal myocardium. The addition of stress myocardial perfusion imaging results significantly improved the fit of a clinical model for predicting cardiac death in patients with and patients without diabetes. Myocardial perfusion PET improved risk reclassification for cardiac death in patients with diabetes (category-based net reclassification index: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60, P < .001). Among diabetic patients, an abnormal myocardial perfusion PET scan was associated with increased risk of cardiac death (HR: 4.4; 95% CI: 2.0, 9.7) in all important clinical subgroups based on age, sex, obesity, or prior revascularization.
CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients referred for clinical 82Rb stress PET, myocardial perfusion imaging results provided incremental risk prediction of cardiac death in patients with and patients without diabetes mellitus.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33778500      PMCID: PMC7970097          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2019180018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  33 in total

1.  Optimal medical therapy vs CT angiography screening for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Not all diabetic patients were created equal: how to discriminate risk?

Authors:  Paolo Raggi; Antonio Bellasi
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men. Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Aiden Abidov; Leslee J Shaw; Aman M Amanullah; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  X Kang; D S Berman; H C Lewin; I Cohen; J D Friedman; G Germano; R Hachamovitch; L J Shaw
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function with PET and PET/CT.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore; Marcelo Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The potential of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification of asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Robert O Bonow; Diethelm Tschöpe; Silvio E Inzucchi; Eugene Barrett
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Threshold, incidence, and predictors of prognostically high-risk silent ischemia in asymptomatic patients without prior diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michael J Zellweger; Rory Hachamovitch; Xingping Kang; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S M Haffner; S Lehto; T Rönnemaa; K Pyörälä; M Laakso
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Potential implications of coronary artery calcium testing for guiding aspirin use among asymptomatic individuals with diabetes.

Authors:  Michael Gordon Silverman; Michael J Blaha; Matthew J Budoff; Juan J Rivera; Paolo Raggi; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel Berman; Tracy Callister; John A Rumberger; Jamal S Rana; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  In-hospital mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction: results from the national inpatient sample, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Bina Ahmed; Herbert T Davis; Warren K Laskey
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  2 in total

1.  The adverse impact of coronary artery disease on left ventricle systolic and diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 3.0T CMR study.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Zhi-Gang Yang; Jin Wang; Ying-Kun Guo; Shan Huang; Rui Shi; Wei-Feng Yan; Wen-Lei Qian; Guang-Xi He
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 2.  Advanced Echocardiography Techniques: The Future Stethoscope of Systemic Diseases.

Authors:  John Iskander; Peter Kelada; Lara Rashad; Doaa Massoud; Peter Afdal; Antoine Fakhry Abdelmassih
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 16.464

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.