| Literature DB >> 33778451 |
Victor Do1,2, Luke Eckersley1,2, Lily Lin1, Sandra T Davidge2,3, Michael K Stickland4, Tiina Ojala5, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin6, Lisa K Hornberger1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetuses of diabetic mothers develop left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and are at increased long-term risk of cardiovascular disease. In our previous longitudinal study from midgestation to late infancy we showed persistence of LV hypertrophy and increased aortic stiffness compared with infants of healthy mothers, the latter of which correlated with third trimester maternal hemoglobin A1c. In the present study, we reexamined the same cohort in early childhood to determine if these cardiovascular abnormalities persisted.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33778451 PMCID: PMC7985002 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.10.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CJC Open ISSN: 2589-790X
Demographic and baseline clinical data for children of control and diabetic mothers
| Parameter | Control | Diabetes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 20 | 25 | NS |
| Age, years | 5.6 ± 1.7 | 5.3 ± 1.3 | 0.14 |
| Birth mode, vaginal/C-section | 17/3 | 21/4 | NS |
| Birth weight, kg | 3.7 ± 0.67 | 3.9 ± 1.3 | 0.21 |
| Female/male | 10/10 | 11/14 | NS |
| Body surface area, m2 | 0.84 ± 0.2 | 0.81 ± 0.18 | 0.12 |
| Height, m | 1.21 ± 0.12 | 1.19 ± 0.11 | 0.39 |
| Weight, kg | 22.2 ± 5.5 | 22.7 ± 6.1 | 0.46 |
| Systolic/diastolic BP, mm Hg | 99 ± 8/60 ± 6 | 101 ± 9/60 ± 5 | 0.2 |
| Family incomes > $100,000 | 16 | 20 | 0.32 |
BP, blood pressure; NS, nonsignificant used for all P values > 0.9.
Parent-reported physical activity of CDMs vs control children
| Activity level | Weekday activity, min | Weekend activity, min | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| Inactive | 0.21 | 0.41 | ||
| Control children | 64 ± 7 | 72 ± 6 | ||
| CDMs | 71 ± 9 | 76 ± 10 | ||
| Somewhat Active | 0.31 | 0.13 | ||
| Control children | 211 ± 23 | 243 ± 43 | ||
| CDMs | 218 ± 13 | 254 ± 25 | ||
| Active | 0.43 | 0.23 | ||
| Control children | 278 ± 20 | 241 ± 31 | ||
| CDMs | 271 ± 24 | 238 ± 34 | ||
| Very Active | 0.21 | 0.56 | ||
| Control children | 198 ± 17 | 200 ± 27 | ||
| CDMs | 193 ± 32 | 195 ± 17 | ||
CDMs, children of diabetic mothers.
According to the Habitual Activity Estimation Scale Childhood Activity Survey.
Figure 1Comparisons of interventricular septal and left ventricular (LV) wall thickness and mass between children of diabetic mothers (CDM) and control children: (A) intraventricular septal thickness in diastole (IVSd) z scores (mean ± SD values) for CDM and control children (P < 0.01); (B) left ventricular (LV) posterior wall thickness in diastole (LVPWd) z scores (mean ± SD values) for CDM vs control children (P = 0.08); (C) LV mass z scores (mean ± SD) for CDM vs control children (P < 0.01). BSA, body surface area.
Figure 2Aortic stiffness in children of diabetic mothers (CDM) vs control children (mean ± SD values): aortic stiffness was significantly increased in CDMs (P < 0.001). PWV, pulse wave velocity.
Figure 3Maternal A1c in the third trimester and aortic stiffness in children of diabetic mothers. Despite a narrow window of relatively good maternal glycemic control, a strong correlation existed between maternal A1c in the third trimester and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Hb, hemoglobin.
Figure 4Correlation between left ventricular wall thickness and mass and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in children of diabetic mothers. There was a significant positive relationship between (A) left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole (LVPWd) and aortic PWV (P < 0.001) and (B) interventricular septal diastolic thickness (IVSd) and aortic PWV (P < 0.0001).
Figure 5Longitudinal predictive means between in children of diabetic mothers (CDM) and control children for interventricular septal thickness (IVS) measures. The difference at each of our assessment points is significant. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 6Longitudinal predictive means between children of diabetic mothers (CDM) and control children for aortic stiffness measures. The difference at each of our assessment points is significant. CI, confidence interval.