Brian Grunau1, Sam D Shemie2,3, Lindsay C Wilson3, Katie N Dainty4,5, Dave Nagpal6, Laura Hornby3,7, Yoan Lamarche8, Sean van Diepen9, Hussein D Kanji10, James Gould11, Richard Saczkowski12, Steven C Brooks13. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine and Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia and St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. Division of Critical Care Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Deceased Donation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4. Patient-Centred Outcomes, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Divisions of Cardiac Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 7. Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 8. Divisions of Cardiac Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 9. Department of Critical Care and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 10. Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 11. Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. 12. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. 13. Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a therapeutic option for refractory cardiac arrest. We sought to perform an environmental scan to describe ECPR utilization in Canada and perceived barriers for application to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: This was a national cross-sectional study. We identified all cardiovascular surgery- and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-capable hospitals in Canada and emergency medical services (EMS) agencies delivering patients to those centres. We requested the medical lead from each hospital's ECMO service and each EMS agency to submit data regarding ECMO and ECPR utilization, as well as perceived barriers to ECPR provision for OHCA. RESULTS: We identified and received survey data from 39 of 39 Canadian hospital institutions and 21 of 22 EMS agencies. Of hospitals, 38 (97%) perform ECMO and 27 (69%) perform ECPR (74% of which perform ≤5 cases per year). Of the 18 (46%) sites offering ECPR for OHCA, 8 apply a formal protocol for eligibility and initiation procedures. EMS agencies demonstrate heterogeneity with intra-arrest transport practices. The primary rationale for nontransport of refractory OHCA is that hospital-based care offers no additional therapies. Perceived barriers to the use of ECPR for OHCA were primarily related to limited evidence supporting its use, rather than resources required. CONCLUSION: Many Canadian cardiovascular surgery- or ECMO-equipped hospitals use ECPR; roughly half employ ECPR for OHCAs. Low case volumes and few formal protocols indicate that this is not a standardized therapy option in most centres. Increased application may be dependent on a stronger evidence base including data from randomized clinical trials currently underway.
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a therapeutic option for refractory cardiac arrest. We sought to perform an environmental scan to describe ECPR utilization in Canada and perceived barriers for application to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: This was a national cross-sectional study. We identified all cardiovascular surgery- and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-capable hospitals in Canada and emergency medical services (EMS) agencies delivering patients to those centres. We requested the medical lead from each hospital's ECMO service and each EMS agency to submit data regarding ECMO and ECPR utilization, as well as perceived barriers to ECPR provision for OHCA. RESULTS: We identified and received survey data from 39 of 39 Canadian hospital institutions and 21 of 22 EMS agencies. Of hospitals, 38 (97%) perform ECMO and 27 (69%) perform ECPR (74% of which perform ≤5 cases per year). Of the 18 (46%) sites offering ECPR for OHCA, 8 apply a formal protocol for eligibility and initiation procedures. EMS agencies demonstrate heterogeneity with intra-arrest transport practices. The primary rationale for nontransport of refractory OHCA is that hospital-based care offers no additional therapies. Perceived barriers to the use of ECPR for OHCA were primarily related to limited evidence supporting its use, rather than resources required. CONCLUSION: Many Canadian cardiovascular surgery- or ECMO-equipped hospitals use ECPR; roughly half employ ECPR for OHCAs. Low case volumes and few formal protocols indicate that this is not a standardized therapy option in most centres. Increased application may be dependent on a stronger evidence base including data from randomized clinical trials currently underway.
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Emelia J Benjamin; Alan S Go; Donna K Arnett; Michael J Blaha; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Sarah de Ferranti; Jean-Pierre Després; Heather J Fullerton; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Paul Muntner; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Carlos J Rodriguez; Wayne Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Daniel Woo; Robert W Yeh; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Karen E A Burns; Mark Duffett; Michelle E Kho; Maureen O Meade; Neill K J Adhikari; Tasnim Sinuff; Deborah J Cook Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Gavin D Perkins; Ian G Jacobs; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Leo L Bossaert; Stephen J Brett; Douglas Chamberlain; Allan R de Caen; Charles D Deakin; Judith C Finn; Jan-Thorsten Gräsner; Mary Fran Hazinski; Taku Iwami; Rudolph W Koster; Swee Han Lim; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Bryan F McNally; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Koenraad G Monsieurs; William Montgomery; Graham Nichol; Kazuo Okada; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Andrew H Travers; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Mark Dennis; Fredrick Zmudzki; Brian Burns; Sean Scott; David Gattas; Claire Reynolds; Hergen Buscher; Paul Forrest Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Steven C Brooks; Sam D Shemie; Sylvia Torrance; Laura Hornby; Clay Gillrie; Brian Grunau; A Dave Nagpal; Andrew Baker; Jim Christenson; John Gill; Laurie Morrison Journal: CJEM Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 2.410
Authors: Ashish R Panchal; Katherine M Berg; Karen G Hirsch; Peter J Kudenchuk; Marina Del Rios; José G Cabañas; Mark S Link; Michael C Kurz; Paul S Chan; Peter T Morley; Mary Fran Hazinski; Michael W Donnino Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Brian Grunau; Laura Hornby; Rohit K Singal; Jim Christenson; Ivan Ortega-Deballon; Sam D Shemie; Jamil Bashir; Steve C Brooks; Clifton W Callaway; Elena Guadagno; Dave Nagpal Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2017-09-09 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Patricia Charlton; Shelley Doucet; Rima Azar; Daniel A Nagel; Leah Boulos; Alison Luke; Kim Mears; Katherine J Kelly; William J Montelpare Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Andrew Fagan; Brian Grunau; Andrew Caddell; James Gould; Erin Rayner-Hartley; Yoan Lamarche; Gurmeet Singh; Dave Nagpal; Marat Slessarev Journal: CJC Open Date: 2022-02-15