Baris Sarici1, Sami Akbulut1, Mehmet Ozcan2, Khaled Demyati3, Emine Samdanci2. 1. Inonu University Faculty Of Medicine, Surgery, Malatya, Turkey. 2. Inonu University Faculty Of Medicine, Patholgoy, Malatya, Turkey. 3. An-najah National University, Suegery, Nablus, Palestinian Territories.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and histopathological features of 42 patients with unusual infectious agents detected in their appendectomy specimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and November 2018, 2.754 patients underwent emergency or incidental appendectomy in our clinic, and their pathology reports were retrospectively reviewed. Unusual infectious agents or eosinophilic infiltration of the appendix were reported in the initial pathological examinations of 57 patients. The pathological slides of these patients were re-examined by histopathologists. The examinations revealed that 15 of these patients had no microscopic findings suggestive of parasitic infections. The remaining 42 patients with unusual appendiceal infectious agents were included into the study. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (25 females and 17 males) aged 18 to 75 years were included into this study. While 32 of these patients (76%) underwent emergency appendectomy with a presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AAp), the remaining 10 patients underwent incidental appendectomy for various reasons. Twenty-two patients (52.4%) had histopathological changes consistent with AAp while 20 patients had no evidence of AAp. Histopathological examination revealed infection with Enterobius vermicularis in 38 of the patients, Taenia species in 2, and Ascaris lumbricoides and Actinomyces species in 1 patient each. A total of 24 patients were treated for infections with mebendazole (n = 20), albendazole (n =1), niclosamide (n = 2), and amoxicillin (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Unusual infectious agents should be considered as factors potentially triggering AAp, especially in patients living in endemic areas. The appendiceal stump should be inspected for parasite residues.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and histopathological features of 42 patients with unusual infectious agents detected in their appendectomy specimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and November 2018, 2.754 patients underwent emergency or incidental appendectomy in our clinic, and their pathology reports were retrospectively reviewed. Unusual infectious agents or eosinophilic infiltration of the appendix were reported in the initial pathological examinations of 57 patients. The pathological slides of these patients were re-examined by histopathologists. The examinations revealed that 15 of these patients had no microscopic findings suggestive of parasitic infections. The remaining 42 patients with unusual appendiceal infectious agents were included into the study. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (25 females and 17 males) aged 18 to 75 years were included into this study. While 32 of these patients (76%) underwent emergency appendectomy with a presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AAp), the remaining 10 patients underwent incidental appendectomy for various reasons. Twenty-two patients (52.4%) had histopathological changes consistent with AAp while 20 patients had no evidence of AAp. Histopathological examination revealed infection with Enterobius vermicularis in 38 of the patients, Taenia species in 2, and Ascaris lumbricoides and Actinomyces species in 1 patient each. A total of 24 patients were treated for infections with mebendazole (n = 20), albendazole (n =1), niclosamide (n = 2), and amoxicillin (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Unusual infectious agents should be considered as factors potentially triggering AAp, especially in patients living in endemic areas. The appendiceal stump should be inspected for parasite residues.
Authors: Mollie Ferris; Samuel Quan; Belle S Kaplan; Natalie Molodecky; Chad G Ball; Greg W Chernoff; Nij Bhala; Subrata Ghosh; Elijah Dixon; Siew Ng; Gilaad G Kaplan Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jeffrey Bethony; Simon Brooker; Marco Albonico; Stefan M Geiger; Alex Loukas; David Diemert; Peter J Hotez Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-05-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sami Akbulut; Mahmut Tas; Nilgun Sogutcu; Zulfu Arikanoglu; Murat Basbug; Abdullah Ulku; Heybet Semur; Yusuf Yagmur Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Danielle Fernandes da Silva; Reinaldo José da Silva; Márcia Guimarães da Silva; Alesso Cervantes Sartorelli; Maria Aparecida Marchesan Rodrigues Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2007-09-13 Impact factor: 2.289
Authors: Imtiaz Wani; Muddasir Maqbool; Abid Amin; Firdous Shah; Arshad Keema; Jang Singh; Maki Kitagawa; Mir Nazir Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.526