Literature DB >> 33778077

Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 mRNA Expression with Subtypes of Pediatric Cholesteatoma.

Taichi Kan1,2, Hiromi Ueda3, Taishi Takahara4, Yoshimasa Tsuchiya1, Mayuko Kishimoto1, Yasue Uchida1, Tetsuya Ogawa1, Wataru Ohashi5, Toyonori Tsuzuki4, Yasushi Fujimoto1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cholesteatoma is a clinically heterogeneous disease, with some patients showing spontaneous regression, while others experiencing an aggressive, lethal disease. Cholesteatoma in children can be divided into two types: congenital and acquired. Identifying good prognostic markers is needed to help select patients who will require immediate surgical intervention. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) was previously reported to play an important role in cholesteatoma progression, by promoting bone destruction and keratinocyte infiltration. Herein, we analyzed MMP2 mRNA expression level in cholesteatoma using RNA-in situ hybridization in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples.
METHODS: Sixty patients with cholesteatoma under 15 years old, who underwent their primary surgery at Aichi Medical University's Otolaryngology Department, were analyzed for MMP2 expression level, using RNA-in situ hybridization.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in MMP2 mRNA expression level between congenital cholesteatoma and acquired cholesteatomas. In congenital cholesteatoma, higher MMP2 signals were observed in the open type than in the closed type (p < 0.001). In acquired cholesteatoma, higher MMP2 signals were observed in the pars tensa than in the pars flaccida (p < 0.001). MMP2 mRNA expression level was almost exclusively found in the fibroblasts or in the inflammatory cells in the stroma, but not in the epithelium.
CONCLUSION: Our study reveals that MMP2 mRNA expression level is strongly associated with the subtypes of cholesteatoma. The findings suggest that the level of expression of MMP2 mRNA may be related to the pathogenesis and aggressive features of cholesteatoma.
Copyright © 2021 Taichi Kan et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33778077      PMCID: PMC7972836          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6644897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  25 in total

1.  Residue of middle ear cholesteatoma after intact canal wall tympanoplasty: surgical findings at one year.

Authors:  K Gyo; Y Sasaki; Y Hinohira; N Yanagihara
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  In situ gene expression and localization of metalloproteinases MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, and their inhibitors TIMP1 and TIMP2 in human renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Venugopal Bhuvarahamurthy; Glen O Kristiansen; Manfred Johannsen; Stefan A Loening; Dietmar Schnorr; Klaus Jung; Andrea Staack
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  The role of gelatinases in colorectal cancer progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Olaf R F Mook; Wilma M Frederiks; Cornelis J F Van Noorden
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2004-12-17

4.  Role of the tympanic ring in the pathogenesis of congenital cholesteatoma.

Authors:  K Aimi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Gelatinolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in middle ear cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Danuta Suchozebrska-Jesionek; Marcin Szymański; Jacek Kurzepa; Wiesław Gołabek; Marta Stryjecka-Zimmer
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-10

6.  An epidermoid formation in the developing middle ear: possible source of cholesteatoma.

Authors:  L Michaels
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1986-06

7.  In situ tumor PD-L1 mRNA expression is associated with increased TILs and better outcome in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Kurt A Schalper; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Daniel Carvajal; Hallie Wimberly; Jason Brown; Lajos Pusztai; David L Rimm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Updates and knowledge gaps in cholesteatoma research.

Authors:  Chin-Lung Kuo; An-Suey Shiao; Matthew Yung; Masafumi Sakagami; Holger Sudhoff; Chih-Hung Wang; Chyong-Hsin Hsu; Chiang-Feng Lien
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  TREM-2 promotes acquired cholesteatoma-induced bone destruction by modulating TLR4 signaling pathway and osteoclasts activation.

Authors:  Huaili Jiang; Yu Si; Zhuohao Li; Xi Huang; Suijun Chen; Yiqing Zheng; Guo Xu; Ximing Chen; Yubin Chen; Yi Liu; Hao Xiong; Qiuhong Huang; Maojin Liang; Zhigang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Matrix metalloproteinase 2: an important genetic marker for cholesteatomas.

Authors:  Douglas Salmazo Rocha Morales; Norma de Oliveira Penido; Ismael Dale Coltrin Guerreiro da Silva; João Norberto Stávale; Arnaldo Guilherme; Yotaka Fukuda
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elena Cantone; Claudio Di Nola; Eugenio De Corso; Michele Cavaliere; Giusi Grimaldi; Anna Rita Fetoni; Gaetano Motta
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-21

Review 2.  Review of potential medical treatments for middle ear cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Matthias Schürmann; Peter Goon; Holger Sudhoff
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 7.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.