Ríona Mc Ardle1,2, Stephanie Pratt1, Christopher Buckley3, Silvia Del Din1, Brook Galna4, Alan Thomas1, Lynn Rochester1,5, Lisa Alcock1. 1. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 2. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 4. School of Biomedical, Nutritional and Sports Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 5. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, National Health Service Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurately differentiating dementia subtypes, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body disease [including dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD)] is important to ensure appropriate management and treatment of the disease. Similarities in clinical presentation create difficulties for differential diagnosis. Simple supportive markers, such as balance assessments, may be useful to the diagnostic toolkit. This study aimed to identify differences in balance impairments between different dementia disease subtypes and normal aging using a single triaxial accelerometer. METHODS: Ninety-seven participants were recruited, forming four groups: cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD group; n = 31), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB group; n = 26), Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD group; n = 13), and normal aging controls (n = 27). Participants were asked to stand still for 2 minutes in a standardized position with their eyes open while wearing a single triaxial accelerometer on their lower back. Seven balance characteristics were derived, including jerk (combined, mediolateral, and anterior-posterior), root mean square (RMS; combined, mediolateral, and anterior-posterior), and ellipsis. Mann-Whitney U tests identified the balance differences between groups. Receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve (AUC) determined the overall accuracy of the selected balance characteristics. RESULTS: The PDD group demonstrated higher RMS [combined (p = 0.001), mediolateral (p = 0.005), and anterior-posterior (p = 0.001)] and ellipsis scores (p < 0.002) than the AD group (AUC = 0.71-0.82). The PDD group also demonstrated significantly impaired balance across all characteristics (p ≤ 0.001) compared to the controls (AUC = 0.79-0.83). Balance differences were not significant between PDD and DLB (AUC = 0.69-0.74), DLB and AD (AUC = 0.50-0.65), DLB and controls (AUC = 0.62-0.68), or AD and controls (AUC = 0.55-0.67) following Bonferroni correction. DISCUSSION: Although feasible and quick to conduct, key findings suggest that an accelerometer-based balance during quiet standing does not differentiate dementia disease subtypes accurately. Assessments that challenge balance more, such as gait or standing with eyes closed, may prove more effective to support differential diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Accurately differentiating dementia subtypes, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body disease [including dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD)] is important to ensure appropriate management and treatment of the disease. Similarities in clinical presentation create difficulties for differential diagnosis. Simple supportive markers, such as balance assessments, may be useful to the diagnostic toolkit. This study aimed to identify differences in balance impairments between different dementia disease subtypes and normal aging using a single triaxial accelerometer. METHODS: Ninety-seven participants were recruited, forming four groups: cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD group; n = 31), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB group; n = 26), Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD group; n = 13), and normal aging controls (n = 27). Participants were asked to stand still for 2 minutes in a standardized position with their eyes open while wearing a single triaxial accelerometer on their lower back. Seven balance characteristics were derived, including jerk (combined, mediolateral, and anterior-posterior), root mean square (RMS; combined, mediolateral, and anterior-posterior), and ellipsis. Mann-Whitney U tests identified the balance differences between groups. Receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve (AUC) determined the overall accuracy of the selected balance characteristics. RESULTS: The PDD group demonstrated higher RMS [combined (p = 0.001), mediolateral (p = 0.005), and anterior-posterior (p = 0.001)] and ellipsis scores (p < 0.002) than the AD group (AUC = 0.71-0.82). The PDD group also demonstrated significantly impaired balance across all characteristics (p ≤ 0.001) compared to the controls (AUC = 0.79-0.83). Balance differences were not significant between PDD and DLB (AUC = 0.69-0.74), DLB and AD (AUC = 0.50-0.65), DLB and controls (AUC = 0.62-0.68), or AD and controls (AUC = 0.55-0.67) following Bonferroni correction. DISCUSSION: Although feasible and quick to conduct, key findings suggest that an accelerometer-based balance during quiet standing does not differentiate dementia disease subtypes accurately. Assessments that challenge balance more, such as gait or standing with eyes closed, may prove more effective to support differential diagnosis.
Authors: Marilyn S Albert; Steven T DeKosky; Dennis Dickson; Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Nick C Fox; Anthony Gamst; David M Holtzman; William J Jagust; Ronald C Petersen; Peter J Snyder; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Plaiwan Suttanon; Keith D Hill; Catherine M Said; Dina Logiudice; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Karen J Dodd Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Shirin Modarresi; Alison Divine; Jessica A Grahn; Tom J Overend; Susan W Hunter Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Ángel Gabriel Estévez-Pedraza; Enrique Hernandez-Laredo; María Elena Millan-Guadarrama; Rigoberto Martínez-Méndez; María Fernanda Carrillo-Vega; Lorena Parra-Rodríguez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-03 Impact factor: 4.614