| Literature DB >> 33777480 |
Wei Yang1.
Abstract
COVID-19 comes out as a sudden pandemic disease within human population. The pandemic dynamics of COVID-19 needs to be studied in detail. A pandemic model with hierarchical quarantine and time delay is proposed in this paper. In the COVID-19 case, the virus incubation period and the antibody failure will cause the time delay and reinfection, respectively, and the hierarchical quarantine strategy includes home isolation and quarantine in hospital. These factors that affect the spread of COVID-19 are well considered and analyzed in the model. The stability of the equilibrium and the nonlinear dynamics is studied as well. The threshold value τ k of the bifurcation is deduced and quantitatively analyzed. Numerical simulations are performed to establish the analytical results with suitable examples. The research reveals that the COVID-19 outbreak may recur over a period of time, which can be helpful to increase the number of tested people with or without symptoms in order to be able to early identify the clusters of infection. And before the effective vaccine is successfully developed, the hierarchical quarantine strategy is currently the best way to prevent the spread of this pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: Bifurcation; COVID-19; Hierarchical quarantine; Pandemic model; Time delay
Year: 2021 PMID: 33777480 PMCID: PMC7988386 DOI: 10.1007/s13235-021-00382-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dyn Games Appl ISSN: 2153-0785 Impact factor: 1.075
Fig. 1State transition diagram of the pandemic model
Notations and their explanations in this paper
| Notations | Explanations |
|---|---|
| The number of susceptible population at time | |
| The number of infected population at time | |
| The number of home isolation population at time | |
| The number of quarantine population at time | |
| The number of delayed population at time | |
| The number of recovered population at time | |
| The total number of population in the model | |
| The infection rate for susceptible population | |
| The infection rate for home isolation population | |
| The rate of the susceptible population compliance home isolation | |
| The rate of the infected population that are quarantined in a hospital | |
| The self-healing rate of infected population | |
| The recovered rate of quarantine population | |
| The rate that the recovered population lose immunity | |
| Time delay before the infected population are quarantined in a hospital |
Existing confirmed data of COVID-19 released by WHO [2]
| Date | Existing confirmed data |
|---|---|
| January 19 | 198 |
| January 20 | 291 |
| January 21 | 431 |
| January 22 | 554 |
| January 23 | 771 |
| January 24 | 1208 |
| January 25 | 1870 |
| January 26 | 2613 |
| January 27 | 4349 |
| January 28 | 5739 |
Values of R0 of well-known pandemic diseases
| Disease | R0 |
|---|---|
| Chickenpox | 10–12 [ |
| Pertussis | 5.5 [ |
| Smallpox | 3.5–6 [ |
| AIDS | 3.65–4.14 [ |
| SARS | 2–5 [ |
| COVID-19 | 1.4–3.9 [ |
| Ebola | 1.5–2.5 [ |
| Seasonal Influenza | 0.9–2.1 [ |
Fig. 2Equilibrium for the pandemic mode when
Fig. 3The number of infected population with different
Fig. 4Equilibrium for the pandemic mode when
Fig. 5The number of infected population with different when
Parameters in the simulations
| Notations | Value |
|---|---|
| 0.4133 | |
| 0.33064 | |
| 0.4 | |
| 0.2 | |
| 0.001 | |
| 0.03 | |
| 0.04 | |
| 14 |
Fig. 6The number of infected population with different when
Fig. 7The number of infected population with different when
Fig. 8The projection of the phase portrait in -space when
Fig. 9The projection of the phase portrait in -space when
Fig. 10The phase portrait of and when
Fig. 11Bifurcation diagram of the equilibrium with
Fig. 12Bifurcation diagram of the equilibrium with
Parameters in Fig. 9
| Notations | Value |
|---|---|
| 0.4133 | |
| 0.4133 | |
| 0.4 | |
| 0.2 | |
| 0.001 | |
| 0.03 | |
| 0.04 | |
| 40 |
Fig. 13State transition diagram of the pandemic model without home isolation
Fig. 14Comparison of the infected population for the two models