Literature DB >> 33777134

Acoustically Enriched Environment during the Critical Period of Postnatal Development Positively Modulates Gap Detection and Frequency Discrimination Abilities in Adult Rats.

Kateryna Pysanenko1, Natalia Rybalko1, Zbyněk Bureš1,2,3, Daniel Šuta1,3,4, Jiří Lindovský1, Josef Syka1.   

Abstract

Throughout life, sensory systems adapt to the sensory environment to provide optimal responses to relevant tasks. In the case of a developing system, sensory inputs induce changes that are permanent and detectable up to adulthood. Previously, we have shown that rearing rat pups in a complex acoustic environment (spectrally and temporally modulated sound) from postnatal day 14 (P14) to P28 permanently improves the response characteristics of neurons in the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex, influencing tonotopical arrangement, response thresholds and strength, and frequency selectivity, along with stochasticity and the reproducibility of neuronal spiking patterns. In this study, we used a set of behavioral tests based on a recording of the acoustic startle response (ASR) and its prepulse inhibition (PPI), with the aim to extend the evidence of the persistent beneficial effects of the developmental acoustical enrichment. The enriched animals were generally not more sensitive to startling sounds, and also, their PPI of ASR, induced by noise or pure tone pulses, was comparable to the controls. They did, however, exhibit a more pronounced PPI when the prepulse stimulus was represented either by a change in the frequency of a background tone or by a silent gap in background noise. The differences in the PPI of ASR between the enriched and control animals were significant at lower (55 dB SPL), but not at higher (65-75 dB SPL), intensities of background sound. Thus, rearing pups in the acoustically enriched environment led to an improvement of the frequency resolution and gap detection ability under more difficult testing conditions, i.e., with a worsened stimulus clarity. We confirmed, using behavioral tests, that an acoustically enriched environment during the critical period of development influences the frequency and temporal processing in the auditory system, and these changes persist until adulthood.
Copyright © 2021 Kateryna Pysanenko et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33777134      PMCID: PMC7979287          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6611922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Plast        ISSN: 1687-5443            Impact factor:   3.599


  68 in total

1.  The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Noise exposure during early development impairs the processing of sound intensity in adult rats.

Authors:  Zbynek Bures; Jolana Grécová; Jirí Popelár; Josef Syka
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Environmental noise exposure degrades normal listening processes.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhou; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Disruption of primary auditory cortex by synchronous auditory inputs during a critical period.

Authors:  Li I Zhang; Shaowen Bao; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Detection of temporal gaps in noise as a measure of the decay of auditory sensation.

Authors:  M J Penner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The development of human fetal hearing.

Authors:  J C Birnholz; B R Benacerraf
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Gap detection threshold in the rat before and after auditory cortex ablation.

Authors:  J Syka; N Rybalko; J Mazelová; R Druga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Sensory experience determines enrichment-induced plasticity in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Cherie R Percaccio; Autumn L Pruette; Shilpa T Mistry; Yeting H Chen; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Use of a modified prepulse inhibition paradigm to assess complex auditory discrimination in rodents.

Authors:  R Holly Fitch; Steven W Threlkeld; Melissa M McClure; Ann M Peiffer
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Differential Neural Responses Underlying the Inhibition of the Startle Response by Pre-Pulses or Gaps in Mice.

Authors:  Rocio Moreno-Paublete; Barbara Canlon; Christopher R Cederroth
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.