| Literature DB >> 33777118 |
Hélida Braga1, Josilene Luciene Duarte2, Luciene da Cruz Fernandes3, Iza Cristina Salles4,5, Caio L Oliveira de Andrade1, Helton E Ramos5, Crésio de Aragão D Alves1,5.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the hearing of children with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) and to analyze the knowledge that parents' have on the possible auditory impacts of the disease.Entities:
Keywords: Auditory perception; Congenital hypothyroidism; Hearing; Risk Factors; Survey and questionnaire
Year: 2020 PMID: 33777118 PMCID: PMC7985011 DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2020.09.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Otol ISSN: 1672-2930
Distribution of the absolute and relative frequency of the main clinical and laboratory data of children diagnosed with CH (n = 263).
| Female | 164 | 62,3 |
| Male | 99 | 37,6 |
| ≤7 days | 51 | 37,5 |
| >7 days | 85 | 62,5 |
| ≤28 days | 83 | 58 |
| >28 days | 60 | 41,9 |
| Adequate | 56 | 59,5 |
| Inappropriate | 38 | 40,4 |
| Regular (TSH: 0,5–15 μUI/ml) | 20 | 18,7 |
| Hypertreated (TSH: < 0,5 μUI/ml) | 40 | 36,3 |
| Hipotreated (TSH: > 15 μUI/ml) | 50 | 45 |
| Dysgenesis | 20 | 28,9 |
| Dyshormonogenesis | 49 | 71 |
| ≤7years | 193 | 73,3 |
| >7 years | 70 | 26,4 |
Legend: (CH) congenital hypothyroidism; (TSH) thyroid stimulating hormone; (n) number of children’s.
Comparative analysis of the mean pure-tone auditory thresholds between groups of children with and without congenital hypothyroidism (n = 160).
| Auditory Thresholds1 | 0.25 kHz | 0.5 kHz | 1 kHz | 2 kHz | 3 kHz | 4 kHz | 6 kHz | 8 kHz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum | 20 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Mean | 13 | 10.9 | 8.9 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 10.7 | 11.1 | 10.9 |
| SD | 4.84 | 3.45 | 3.68 | 3.91 | 4.40 | 5.05 | 3.95 | 4.0 |
| Minimum | 5 | 0 | −5 | −5 | −5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum | 15 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Mean | 7.50 | 6.17 | 4.0 | 4.17 | 4.50 | 5.67 | 6.33 | 4.33 |
| SD | 3.15 | 3.13 | 3.32 | 3.24 | 4.22 | 3.14 | 2.60 | 3.14 |
| ∗pa value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Legend: 1dB HL - Decibel hearing level; kHz-frequencies in kilohertz; n - number of ears; CH - children with congenital hypothyroidism; SD – Standard deviation; p, statistically significant difference for all frequencies between groups; ∗, Student’s t-test applied (p ≤ 0.05).
Comparison between the groups regarding the levels of intensity necessary to trigger the contralateral acoustic reflex.
| The levels of intensity acoustic reflex | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Groups (n) | Min/Max | Mean1 | SD | ∗p-values |
| 0.5 kHz | CH (91) | 70/105 | 82,00 | 14,46 | 0,37 |
| CG (60) | 70/85 | 78,83 | 17,05 | ||
| 1 kHz | CH (100) | 70/95 | 81,70 | 11,96 | 0,00∗ |
| CG (60) | 70/85 | 78.83 | 17,05 | ||
| 2 kHz | CH (93) | 70/110 | 86,40 | 8,75 | 0,03∗ |
| CG (58) | 70/100 | 81,67 | 10,02 | ||
| 4 kHz | CH (87) | 70/105 | 85,50 | 14,99 | 0,05∗ |
| CG (60) | 70/85 | 78,33 | 17,43 |
Note: ∗ Student t-test applied (statistically significant p ≤ 0,05). Legend: CH – children with congenital hypothyroidism; CG – group control/children without congenital hypothyroidism, Hz-Hertz; n - number of ears; SD - standard deviation; Min - Minimum; Máx – Maximum; 1- Decibel values of hearing level.
Fig. 1Distribution of the acoustic reflex, per ear, at frequencies of 0.5 kHz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz and 4 kHz for the group with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) (n = 100).
Distribution of responses from parents and guardians interviewed about congenital hypothyroidism and hearing.
| INTERVIEW | AF | RF (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Do you know any exam∖test that can evaluate the hearing? | ||
| Yes | 164 | 62,3% |
| No | 99 | 37,6% |
| None | 158 | 55,5% |
| OAE test | 96 | 36,5% |
| Audiometry | 17 | 6,4% |
| ABR | 1 | 0,3% |
| OAE, ABR, Audiometry | 3 | 1.1% |
| Yes | 96 | 36,5% |
| No | 167 | 63,5% |
| None | 156 | 59,3% |
| Pediatrician | 66 | 25,1% |
| Endocrinologist | 3 | 1,1% |
| Nurse | 24 | 9,1% |
| Speech-Language Pathologist | 7 | 2,6% |
| Clínical | 5 | 1,9% |
| Health Center/information stand | 2 | 0,7% |
| Yes | 145 | 55,1% |
| No | 118 | 44,8% |
| Yes | 34 | 12,9% |
| No | 229 | 87,0% |
| None | 38 | 14,4% |
| Endocrinologist | 123 | 46,7% |
| Pediatrician and/or Social Worker | 84 | 31,9% |
| Nurse | 4 | 1,5% |
| Friends/Family/Others | 14 | 5,3% |
| Yes | 57 | 21,6% |
| No | 206 | 78,3% |
| Yes | 35 | 13,3% |
| No | 228 | 86,6% |
| High | 9 | 3,4% |
| Moderate | 55 | 20,9% |
| Low | 110 | 41,8% |
| Reduced/Null | 89 | 33,8% |
Note: ∗A responsible may have said one or more answers in this regard. Legend: OAE- Otoacoustic emissions, ABR- Evoked auditory brainstem response.
Fig. 2Linear regression graph of the score of the interviewed parents versus TSH values (μUI/mL) of children with congenital hypothyroidism collected on the day of the questionnaire application (n = 263).
Description of the clinical-laboratory variables of the children with congenital hypothyroidism, prevalence ratios (PR) and respective confidence intervals (95% CI) for the parents’ knowledge levels (n = 263).
| DEGREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF PARENTS′ | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical and laboratory data | Reduced | Low | Moderate | High | ||||||||
| % | PR | (95% CI) | % | PR | (95%CI) | % | PR | (95% CI) | % | PR | (95% CI) | |
| Mother | 30,8 | 1,00 | 35,36 | 1,00 | 17,11 | 1,00 | 3,42 | 1,00 | ||||
| Father | 1,1 | 0,44 (0,16-4,47) | 3,80 | 1,29 (0,82-5,72) | 2,28 | 1,60 (0,79-10,09) | 0,00 | |||||
| Brother/Sister | 0,0 | 1,14 | 2,45 (2,10–13,57) | 0,00 | 0,00 | |||||||
| Grandfather/Grandmother | 1,52 | 1,13 (0,52-6,72) | 0,76 | 0,49 (0,14-5,70) | 1,52 | 2,03 (0,91-16,94) | 0,00 | |||||
| Uncle/Aunt | 0,38 | 0,94 (0,19-12,78) | 0,76 | 1,63 (0,72-11,59) | 0,00 | 0,00 | ||||||
| A1 | 0,38 | 4,10 (2,82–87,10) | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | |||||||
| A2 | 1,14 | 4,10 (2,82–87,10) | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | |||||||
| B1 | 1,90 | 1,28 (0,57-8,13) | 2,66 | 1,02 (0,55-5,07) | 1,52 | 0,86 (0,35-5,87) | 0,00 | |||||
| B2 | 9,13 | 1,69 (1,05–8,81) | 9,13 | 0,96 (0,65-3,87) | 3,04 | 0,47 (0,23-3,31) | 0,76 | 0,99 (0,17-15,59) | ||||
| C1 | 10,65 | 1,59 (0,99-7,88) | 11,79 | 1,00 (0,70-3,90) | 3,80 | 0,48 (0,25-3,13) | 1,14 | 1,19 (0,25-15,86) | ||||
| C2 | 7,98 | 1,00 | 14,07 | 1,00 | 9,51 | 1,00 | 1,14 | 1,00 | ||||
| D/E | 2,66 | 1,06 (0,51-6,05) | 4,18 | 0,95 (0,57-4,32) | 3,04 | 1,02 (0,52-5,41) | 0,38 | 1,06 (0,12–26,66) | ||||
| >7 days∗ | 3,80 | 1,00 | 9,89 | 1,00 | 4,56 | 1,00 | 1,14 | 1,00 | ||||
| ≤7 days | 9,89 | 1,56 (0,82-9,04) | 13,69 | 0,83 (0,58-3,31) | 7,22 | 0,95 (0,50-4,87) | 1,52 | 0,80 (0,19-9,55) | ||||
| >28 days∗ | 8,37% | 1,00 | 16,35 | 1,00 | 5,70 | 1,00 | 1,14 | 1,00 | ||||
| ≤28 days | 6,84% | 1,13 (0,67-5,24) | 8,37 | 0,71 (0,48-3,00) | 6,46 | 1,57 (0,85-8,82) | 1,14 | 1,38 (0,29-19,08) | ||||
| >7 years | 4,84 | 1,00 | 11,41 | 1,00 | 9,22 | 1,00 | 1,14 | 1,00 | ||||
| ≤7 years | 30,00 | 1,43 (0,92-6,49) | 29,42 | 0,97 (0,70-3,62) | 14,69 | 0,69 (0,42-3,23) | 2,28 | 0,73 (0,19-8,04) | ||||
| Regular | 5,70 | 1,00 | 8,37 | 1,00 | 3,80 | 1,00 | 1,14 | 1,00 | ||||
| Hypertreated | 1,52 | 0,67 (0,25-5,16) | 4,18 | 1,25 (0,75-5,78) | 1,52 | 1,00 (0,35-7,67) | 0,38 | 0,83 (0,09–20,83) | ||||
| Hypotrated | 5,32 | 0,35 (0,19-2,58) | 5,70 | 0,38 (0,23-2,42) | 3,42 | 0,23 (0,10-2,78) | 0,76 | 0,05 (0,01–5,99) | ||||
| Non-Dysgenesis | 3,80 | 1,00 | 9,13 | 1,00 | 4,94 | 1,00 | 0,76% | 1,00 | ||||
| Dysgenesis | 3,04 | 1,96 (0,91-15,34) | 2,66 | 0,71 (0,37-3,96) | 1,90 | 0,94 (0,39-6,25) | 0,00% | |||||
Note: ∗Age limit recommended by the Ministry of Health, by the Unique Health System, as appropriate for the beginning of the treatment of congenital hypothyroidism. ∗∗p ≤ 0,05 Chi-square test applied. Legend: CCEB: Brazil-ABEP Economic Classification Criteria; Neo = Neonatal, PR = Prevalence ratio; CI = confidence interval; CH- congenital hypothyroidism.