Xin Li1,2, Gavin S Chu1, Tiago P Almeida1,2, Frederique J Vanheusden3, João Salinet4, Nawshin Dastagir5, Amar R Mistry1, Zakariyya Vali1,6, Bharat Sidhu1, Peter J Stafford6, Fernando S Schlindwein2,6, G André Ng1,6. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom. 2. School of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom. 3. School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom. 4. Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Engineering, Modelling and Applied Social Sciences (CECS), Federal University of ABC, Santo André, Brazil. 5. Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 6. National Institute for Health Research Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Purpose: Identifying targets for catheter ablation remains challenging in persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). The dominant frequency (DF) of atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF) is believed to primarily reflect local activation. Highest DF (HDF) might be responsible for the initiation and perpetuation of persAF. However, the spatiotemporal behavior of DF remains not fully understood. Some DFs during persAF were shown to lack spatiotemporal stability, while others exhibit recurrent behavior. We sought to develop a tool to automatically detect recurrent DF patterns in persAF patients. Methods: Non-contact mapping of the left atrium (LA) was performed in 10 patients undergoing persAF HDF ablation. 2,048 virtual electrograms (vEGMs, EnSite Array, Abbott Laboratories, USA) were collected for up to 5 min before and after ablation. Frequency spectrum was estimated using fast Fourier transform and DF was identified as the peak between 4 and 10 Hz and organization index (OI) was calculated. The HDF maps were identified per 4-s window and an automated pattern recognition algorithm was used to find recurring HDF spatial patterns. Dominant patterns (DPs) were defined as the HDF pattern with the highest recurrence. Results: DPs were found in all patients. Patients in atrial flutter after ablation had a single DP over the recorded time period. The time interval (median [IQR]) of DP recurrence for the patients in AF after ablation (7 patients) decreased from 21.1 s [11.8 49.7 s] to 15.7 s [6.5 18.2 s]. The DF inside the DPs presented lower temporal standard deviation (0.18 ± 0.06 Hz vs. 0.29 ± 0.12 Hz, p < 0.05) and higher OI (0.35 ± 0.03 vs. 0.31 ± 0.04, p < 0.05). The atrial regions with the highest proportion of HDF region were the septum and the left upper pulmonary vein. Conclusion: Multiple recurrent spatiotemporal HDF patterns exist during persAF. The proposed method can identify and quantify the spatiotemporal repetition of the HDFs, where the high recurrences of DP may suggest a more organized rhythm. DPs presented a more consistent DF and higher organization compared with non-DPs, suggesting that DF with higher OI might be more likely to recur. Recurring patterns offer a more comprehensive dynamic insight of persAF behavior, and ablation targeting such regions may be beneficial.
Purpose: Identifying targets for catheter ablation remains challenging in persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). The dominant frequency (DF) of atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF) is believed to primarily reflect local activation. Highest DF (HDF) might be responsible for the initiation and perpetuation of persAF. However, the spatiotemporal behavior of DF remains not fully understood. Some DFs during persAF were shown to lack spatiotemporal stability, while others exhibit recurrent behavior. We sought to develop a tool to automatically detect recurrent DF patterns in persAF patients. Methods: Non-contact mapping of the left atrium (LA) was performed in 10 patients undergoing persAF HDF ablation. 2,048 virtual electrograms (vEGMs, EnSite Array, Abbott Laboratories, USA) were collected for up to 5 min before and after ablation. Frequency spectrum was estimated using fast Fourier transform and DF was identified as the peak between 4 and 10 Hz and organization index (OI) was calculated. The HDF maps were identified per 4-s window and an automated pattern recognition algorithm was used to find recurring HDF spatial patterns. Dominant patterns (DPs) were defined as the HDF pattern with the highest recurrence. Results:DPs were found in all patients. Patients in atrial flutter after ablation had a single DP over the recorded time period. The time interval (median [IQR]) of DP recurrence for the patients in AF after ablation (7 patients) decreased from 21.1 s [11.8 49.7 s] to 15.7 s [6.5 18.2 s]. The DF inside the DPs presented lower temporal standard deviation (0.18 ± 0.06 Hz vs. 0.29 ± 0.12 Hz, p < 0.05) and higher OI (0.35 ± 0.03 vs. 0.31 ± 0.04, p < 0.05). The atrial regions with the highest proportion of HDF region were the septum and the left upper pulmonary vein. Conclusion: Multiple recurrent spatiotemporal HDF patterns exist during persAF. The proposed method can identify and quantify the spatiotemporal repetition of the HDFs, where the high recurrences of DP may suggest a more organized rhythm. DPs presented a more consistent DF and higher organization compared with non-DPs, suggesting that DF with higher OI might be more likely to recur. Recurring patterns offer a more comprehensive dynamic insight of persAF behavior, and ablation targeting such regions may be beneficial.
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; Tina Baykaner; Paul Clopton; Amir Schricker; Gautam G Lalani; David E Krummen; Kalyanam Shivkumar; John M Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Xin Li; João L Salinet; Tiago P Almeida; Frederique J Vanheusden; Gavin S Chu; G André Ng; Fernando S Schlindwein Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: J L Salinet; J P V Madeiro; P C Cortez; P J Stafford; G André Ng; G André Ng; F S Schlindwein Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2013-04-07 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Julian W E Jarman; Tom Wong; Pipin Kojodjojo; Hilmar Spohr; Justin E R Davies; Michael Roughton; Darrel P Francis; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Mark D O'Neill; Vias Markides; D Wyn Davies; Nicholas S Peters Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-24
Authors: Gavin S Chu; Xin Li; Peter J Stafford; Frederique J Vanheusden; João L Salinet; Tiago P Almeida; Nawshin Dastagir; Alastair J Sandilands; Paulus Kirchhof; Fernando S Schlindwein; G André Ng Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 4.755