Literature DB >> 33776794

Altitude Cardiomyopathy Is Associated With Impaired Stress Electrocardiogram and Increased Circulating Inflammation Makers.

Ya-Jun Shi1, Jin-Li Wang1, Ling Gao1, Dong-Lin Wen1, Qing Dan1, Ying Dong1, Ya-Tao Guo1, Cheng-Hui Zhao1, Teng-Jing Li1, Jun Guo1, Zong-Bin Li1, Yun-Dai Chen1.   

Abstract

Many sea-level residents suffer from acute mountain sickness (AMS) when first visiting altitudes above 4,000 m. Exercise tolerance also decreases as altitude increases. We observed exercise capacity at sea level and under a simulated hypobaric hypoxia condition (SHHC) to explore whether the response to exercise intensity represented by physiological variables could predict AMS development in young men. Eighty young men from a military academy underwent a standard treadmill exercise test (TET) and biochemical blood test at sea level, SHHC, and 4,000-m altitude, sequentially, between December 2015 and March 2016. Exercise-related variables and 12-lead electrocardiogram parameters were obtained. Exercise intensity and AMS development were investigated. After exposure to high altitude, the count of white blood cells, alkaline phosphatase and serum albumin were increased (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in exercise time and metabolic equivalents (METs) between SHHC and high-altitude exposures (7.05 ± 1.02 vs. 7.22 ± 0.96 min, P = 0.235; 9.62 ± 1.11 vs. 9.38 ± 1.12, P = 0.126, respectively). However, these variables were relatively higher at sea level (8.03 ± 0.24 min, P < 0.01; 10.05 ± 0.31, P < 0.01, respectively). Thus, subjects displayed an equivalent exercise tolerance upon acute exposure to high altitude and to SHHC. The trends of cardiovascular hemodynamics during exercise under the three different conditions were similar. However, both systolic blood pressure and the rate-pressure product at every TET stage were higher at high altitude and under the SHHC than at sea level. After acute exposure to high altitude, 19 (23.8%) subjects developed AMS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that METs under the SHHC {odds ratio (OR) 0.355 per unit increment [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.159-0.793], P = 0.011}, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at rest under SHHC [OR 0.893 per mmHg (95%CI 0.805-0.991), P = 0.030], and recovery DBP 3 min after exercise at sea level [OR 1.179 per mmHg (95%CI 1.043-1.333), P = 0.008] were independently associated with AMS. The predictive model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.886 (95%CI 0.803-0.969, P < 0.001). Thus, young men have similar exercise tolerance in acute exposure to high altitude and to SHHC. Moreover, AMS can be predicted with superior accuracy using characteristics easily obtainable with TET.
Copyright © 2021 Shi, Wang, Gao, Wen, Dan, Dong, Guo, Zhao, Li, Guo, Li and Chen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute mountain sickness; inflammation; prediction; simulated hypobaric hypoxia condition; treadmill exercise test

Year:  2021        PMID: 33776794      PMCID: PMC7991828          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.640302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.755


  27 in total

1.  Effect of time exposure to high altitude on zinc and copper concentrations in human plasma.

Authors:  S B Rawal; M V Singh; A K Tyagi; J Roy; G P Dimri; W Selvamurthy
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1999-12

2.  Exercise standards for testing and training: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Gerald F Fletcher; Philip A Ades; Paul Kligfield; Ross Arena; Gary J Balady; Vera A Bittner; Lola A Coke; Jerome L Fleg; Daniel E Forman; Thomas C Gerber; Martha Gulati; Kushal Madan; Jonathan Rhodes; Paul D Thompson; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  [Altitude and the cardiovascular system].

Authors:  Jean-Paul Richalet
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 1.228

4.  Cardiovascular and ventilatory response to isocapnic hypoxia at sea level and at 5,050 m.

Authors:  G Insalaco; S Romano; A Salvaggio; A Braghiroli; P Lanfranchi; V Patruno; C F Donner; G Bonsignore
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-05

5.  Maximal performance at altitude and on return from altitude in conditioned runners.

Authors:  E R Buskirk; J Kollias; R F Akers; E K Prokop; E P Reategui
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.531

6.  Risk prediction score for severe high altitude illness: a cohort study.

Authors:  Florence Canouï-Poitrine; Kalaivani Veerabudun; Philippe Larmignat; Murielle Letournel; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin; Jean-Paul Richalet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Four-Way Comparison of Cardiac Function with Normobaric Normoxia, Normobaric Hypoxia, Hypobaric Hypoxia and Genuine High Altitude.

Authors:  Christopher John Boos; John Paul O'Hara; Adrian Mellor; Peter David Hodkinson; Costas Tsakirides; Nicola Reeve; Liam Gallagher; Nicholas Donald Charles Green; David Richard Woods
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Athletes at High Altitude.

Authors:  Morteza Khodaee; Heather L Grothe; Jonathan H Seyfert; Karin VanBaak
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 9.  Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Cristina Masuet-Aumatell; Alba Sánchez-Mascuñano; Fernando Agüero Santangelo; Sergio Morchón Ramos; Josep Maria Ramon-Torrell
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The relationship between anxiety and acute mountain sickness.

Authors:  Christopher J Boos; Malcolm Bass; John P O'Hara; Emma Vincent; Adrian Mellor; Luke Sevier; Humayra Abdul-Razakq; Mark Cooke; Matt Barlow; David R Woods
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.