| Literature DB >> 33776553 |
Miriam Chasson1, Ofir Ben-Yaakov1, Orit Taubman-Ben-Ari1.
Abstract
On the assumption that existential questions may arise in the face of the transition to motherhood in the shadow of a global crisis, we sought to compare the levels of presence of meaning and search for meaning in life between two samples of new mothers: one recruited before the outbreak of COVID-19, and the other during the pandemic. In addition, we examined the associations between mother's marital satisfaction and perception of the infant on the one hand, and the two aspects of meaning in life on the other, investigating whether these variables mediate the link between research group and meaning in life. The results indicate that mothers reported significantly higher perception of infant's warmth and presence of meaning before than during the pandemic. Furthermore, they displayed greater marital satisfaction and more search for meaning during the pandemic than prior to it. For the whole sample, higher marital satisfaction and perception of infant's warmth were related to higher presence of meaning, and lower marital satisfaction and perception of the infant's invasiveness were related to higher search for meaning. Finally, mother's marital satisfaction and perception of the infant fully mediated the relationship between the research group and the two aspects of meaning in life. These findings are significant in that they provide, for the first time, evidence of changes in meaning in life among new mothers in a crisis situation, along with the importance of their perceptions of their relationships with the infant and spouse under these circumstances.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Marital satisfaction; Meaning in life; Mothers; Perception of the infant
Year: 2021 PMID: 33776553 PMCID: PMC7986640 DOI: 10.1007/s10902-021-00378-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Happiness Stud ISSN: 1389-4978
Means, standard deviations, and t-tests for the study variables by group
| Group 1—Before the pandemic (n = 685) | Group 2—During the pandemic (n = 453) | t | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | ||
| Marital satisfaction | 5.62 | 1.13 | 5.80 | 0.99 | −2.80** |
| Infant’s warmth | 4.98 | 0.64 | 4.88 | 0.58 | 2.52** |
| Infant’s invasiveness | 2.35 | 0.67 | 2.42 | 0.63 | −1.78 |
| Presence of meaning | 5.40 | 1.01 | 5.24 | 1.06 | 2.40* |
| Search of meaning | 4.45 | 1.47 | 4.66 | 1.35 | −2.46* |
*p < .0.05
**p < .001
Pearson correlations between demographic and personal resources and presence and search of meaning in the whole sample
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Age | – | 0.35*** | 0.18*** | −0.04 | −0.15*** | −0.001 | 0.09** | −0.04 |
| 2. Education | – | 0.21*** | −0.006 | −0.20*** | 0.11*** | −0.03 | 0.08** | |
| 3. Economic status | – | .02 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.02 | −0.06* | ||
| 4. Marital satisfaction | – | 0.06* | −0.14*** | 0.25*** | −10** | |||
| 5. Infant’s warmth | – | −0.13*** | 0.26*** | 0.006 | ||||
| 6. Infant’s invasiveness | – | −0.21*** | 0.11*** | |||||
| 7. Presence of meaning | – | −10** | ||||||
| 8. Search for meaning | – |
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001
Total, direct, and indirect effects between group and presence of meaning
| Effect | SE | t | 95% BC CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total effect of group on presence of meaning | −0.12 | 0.07 | −1.88 | −0.26, 0.005 ns |
| Direct effect of group on presence of meaning | −0.15 | 0.06 | −2.36* | −0.27, −0.02 |
| Indirect effect via marital satisfaction | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.02, 0.09 | |
| Indirect effect via infant’s warmth | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.04, 0.01 ns | |
| Indirect effect via infant’s invasiveness | −0.02 | 0.01 | −0.04, −0.004 | |
| Indirect effect via marital satisfaction and infant’s warmth | 0.003 | 0.002 | −0.0003, 0.008 ns | |
| Indirect effect via marital satisfaction and infant’s invasiveness | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.002, 0.011 | |
| Indirect effect via infant’s warmth and invasiveness | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.004, 0.0007 ns | |
| Indirect effect via marital satisfaction, infant’s warmth, and infant’s invasiveness | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0000, 0.0007 |
ns = not statistically significant (as evidenced by a bootstrap confidence interval that straddles zero)
* < 0.05
Fig. 1Indirect Effects between Group and Presence of Meaning: Beta Weights and Standard Errors. Note a0 = before the pandemic, 1 = during the pandemic; bDirect effect; cTotal effect
Fig. 2Indirect Effects between Group and Search for Meaning: Beta Weights and Standard Errors. Note: a0 = before the pandemic, 1 = during the pandemic; bDirect effect; cTotal effect
Total, direct, and indirect effects between group and search for meaning
| Effect | SE | t | 95% BC CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total effect of group on presence of meaning | 0.17 | 0.09 | 1.86 | −0.009, 0.35 ns |
| Direct effect of group on presence of meaning | 0.19 | 0.09 | 2.09* | 0.01, 0.37 |
| Indirect effect via marital satisfaction | −0.03 | 0.01 | −0.06, −0.01 | |
| Indirect effect via infant’s warmth | −0.004 | 0.005 | −0.01, 0.004 ns | |
| Indirect effect via infant’s invasiveness | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.002, 0.04 | |
| Indirect effect via marital satisfaction and infant’s warmth | 0.007 | 0.008 | −0.0005, 0.002 ns | |
| Indirect effect via marital satisfaction and infant’s invasiveness | −0.004 | 0.002 | −0.01, −0.001 | |
| Indirect effect via infant’s warmth and invasiveness | 0.001 | 0.001 | −0.006, .003 ns | |
| Indirect effect via marital satisfaction, infant’s warmth, and infant’s invasiveness | −0.0002 | 0.0002 | −0.0006, .0000 ns |
ns = not statistically significant (as evidenced by a bootstrap confidence interval that straddles zero)
* < 0.05