Literature DB >> 3377623

Two models of implementing informed consent.

C W Lidz1, P S Appelbaum, A Meisel.   

Abstract

The doctrine of informed consent has been controversial since its inception. In spite of the professed ideal of improving physician-patient communication, many commentators have argued that it interferes with the relationship. However, the problem may not be the doctrine itself but rather the manner in which it is usually implemented. This article describes two different ways in which informed consent can be implemented. The event model treats informed consent as a procedure to be performed once in each treatment course, which must cover all legal elements at that time. The process model, in contrast, tries to integrate informing the patient into the continuing dialogue between physician and patient that is a routine part of diagnosis and treatment. We suggest that the process model has many benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3377623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  33 in total

1.  Ethics in long-term care. Are the principles different?

Authors:  M G Kuczewski
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-01

2.  From informed consent to substituted judgment: decision-making at the end-of-life.

Authors:  Mark Kuczewski
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

Review 3.  A framework of pediatric hospital discharge care informed by legislation, research, and practice.

Authors:  Jay G Berry; Kevin Blaine; Jayne Rogers; Sarah McBride; Edward Schor; Jackie Birmingham; Mark A Schuster; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 4.  Medical ethics for the genome world: a paper from the 2007 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Language Barriers, Informed Consent, and Effective Caregiving.

Authors:  Lachlan Forrow; Jane Crandall Kontrimas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions. Informed decision making in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  C H Braddock; S D Fihn; W Levinson; A R Jonsen; R A Pearlman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Involving patients in complex decisions about their care: an approach using the analytic hierarchy process.

Authors:  J G Dolan; D R Bordley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Paul J Catalano; Angel Cronin; Matthew D Finkelman; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  What do patients prefer: informed consent models for genetic carrier testing.

Authors:  K E Ormond; M Iris; S Banuvar; J Minogue; G J Annas; S Elias
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  "Surgery is certainly one good option": quality and time-efficiency of informed decision-making in surgery.

Authors:  Clarence Braddock; Pamela L Hudak; Jacob J Feldman; Sylvia Bereknyei; Richard M Frankel; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.