Literature DB >> 33776175

Individual and social factors affecting the ability of American crows to solve and master a string pulling task.

LomaJohn T Pendergraft1, Adrienne L Lehnert2, John M Marzluff1.   

Abstract

Crows and other birds in the family Corvidae regularly share information to learn the identity and whereabouts of dangerous predators, but can they use social learning to solve a novel task for a food reward? Here we examined the factors affecting the ability of 27 wild-caught American crows to solve a common string-pulling task in a laboratory setting. We split crows into two groups; one group was given the task after repeatedly observing a conspecific model the solution, the other solved in the absence of conspecific models. We recorded the crows' estimated age, sex, size, body condition, level of nervousness, and brain volume using DICOM images from a CT scan. Although none of these variables were statistically significant, crows without a conspecific model and large brain volumes consistently mastered the task in the minimum number of days, whereas those with conspecific models and smaller brain volumes required varying and sometimes a substantial number of days to master the task. We found indirect evidence that body condition might also be important for motivating crows to solve the task. Crows with conspecific models were no more likely to initially solve the task than those working the puzzle without social information, but those that mastered the task usually copied the method most frequently demonstrated by their knowledgeable neighbors. These findings suggest that brain volume and possibly body condition may be factors in learning new tasks, and that crows can use social learning to refine their ability to obtain a novel food source, although they must initially learn to access it themselves.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American crow, Corvus brachyrhynchos; Body condition; Brain volume; Social learning; String-pulling task

Year:  2019        PMID: 33776175      PMCID: PMC7996111          DOI: 10.1111/eth.12980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethology        ISSN: 0179-1613            Impact factor:   1.897


  39 in total

1.  Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions.

Authors:  Bennett G. Galef; Luc-Alain Giraldeau
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild.

Authors:  Ella F Cole; John L Quinn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The role of motivational factors in insightful problem-solving.

Authors:  H G BIRCH
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1945       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 4.  A critique of comparative studies of brain size.

Authors:  Susan D Healy; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The effects of age and previous training on patterned-strings performance of Rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  W A MASON; H F HARLOW
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-12

6.  Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain.

Authors:  Seweryn Olkowicz; Martin Kocourek; Radek K Lučan; Michal Porteš; W Tecumseh Fitch; Suzana Herculano-Houzel; Pavel Němec
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Social learning in humans and nonhuman animals: theoretical and empirical dissections.

Authors:  Mark Nielsen; Francys Subiaul; Bennett Galef; Thomas Zentall; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Amram; Kay E Holekamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  When larger brains do not have more neurons: increased numbers of cells are compensated by decreased average cell size across mouse individuals.

Authors:  Suzana Herculano-Houzel; Débora J Messeder; Karina Fonseca-Azevedo; Nilma A Pantoja
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  Brain size affects female but not male survival under predation threat.

Authors:  Alexander Kotrschal; Séverine D Buechel; Sarah M Zala; Alberto Corral-Lopez; Dustin J Penn; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.