Literature DB >> 33776138

College Students' Reasons for Leaving Biomedical Fields: Disenchantment with Biomedicine or Attraction to Other Fields?

Emily Q Rosenzweig1, Judith M Harackiewicz1, Cameron A Hecht1, Stacy J Priniski1, Elizabeth A Canning1, Yoi Tibbetts1, Michael W Asher1, Janet S Hyde1.   

Abstract

This study examined whether students who left biomedical fields of study during college did so primarily because they became disenchanted with those fields or because they felt attracted to alternative fields of study. We identified 1193 students intending to pursue biomedical fields of study early in college, collected data about their beliefs and performance throughout college, and interviewed them near graduation about their future plans. Descriptively, we examined the topics students discussed as affecting their attrition decisions. Predictive research aims were to determine how academic performance, interest, and demographic factors predicted students' likelihood of overall attrition and likelihood of reporting distinct reasons for attrition. Among the 192 students who left biomedical fields, 62.5% described leaving only in terms of feeling disenchanted, whereas 37.4% expressed that they left at least in part due to feeling attracted towards non-biomedical fields. Most students who left biomedical fields expressed changing plans for reasons related to interest; this was especially prevalent among students who reported leaving due to attraction towards non-biomedical fields. Predictive analyses showed that interest in biology and grades at the end of an introductory biology course predicted the likelihood of overall attrition and likelihood of leaving due to feeling disenchantment, whereas underrepresented ethnic minority status predicted these outcomes positively. Interest and course grades also predicted the likelihood of students leaving due to feeling attraction towards other fields, but interest was a stronger predictor relative to grades. Results highlight distinct types of attrition that may have implications for policies to promote STEM retention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STEM; attrition; biomedical fields; college; expectancy-value theory; interest

Year:  2020        PMID: 33776138      PMCID: PMC7989803          DOI: 10.1037/edu0000456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0663


  20 in total

1.  Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological intervention.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Cohen; Julio Garcia; Nancy Apfel; Allison Master
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Social class culture cycles: how three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality.

Authors:  Nicole M Stephens; Hazel Rose Markus; L Taylor Phillips
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students.

Authors:  Gregory M Walton; Geoffrey L Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems.

Authors:  Gregory M Walton; Timothy D Wilson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jacquelynne S Eccles; Sarah Kenny
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-18

6.  Staying Engaged: Knowledge and Research Needs in Student Engagement.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica Degol
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2014-06-17

7.  Affirming independence: Exploring mechanisms underlying a values affirmation intervention for first-generation students.

Authors:  Yoi Tibbetts; Judith M Harackiewicz; Elizabeth A Canning; Jilana S Boston; Stacy J Priniski; Janet S Hyde
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-05

8.  Seeking congruity between goals and roles: a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers.

Authors:  Amanda B Diekman; Elizabeth R Brown; Amanda M Johnston; Emily K Clark
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-07-14

9.  From Bench to Bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students' biomedical science motivation.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Brown; Jessi L Smith; Dustin B Thoman; Jill M Allen; Gregg Muragishi
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

10.  From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses.

Authors:  Josephine A Gasiewski; M Kevin Eagan; Gina A Garcia; Sylvia Hurtado; Mitchell J Chang
Journal:  Res High Educ       Date:  2012-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Did you leave university science? Tell us why.

Authors:  Nidhi Subbaraman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Appealing to Faculty Gatekeepers: Motivational Processes for Intentions to Adopt an Evidence-B ased Intervention.

Authors:  Peter McPartlan; Dustin B Thoman; Jennifer Poe; Felisha A Herrera; Jessi L Smith
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 11.566

3.  Inside the STEM pipeline: Changes in students' biomedical career plans across the college years.

Authors:  Emily Q Rosenzweig; Cameron A Hecht; Stacy J Priniski; Elizabeth A Canning; Michael W Asher; Yoi Tibbetts; Janet S Hyde; Judith M Harackiewicz
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 14.136

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.