Literature DB >> 3377517

Unreliability of self-reported burning tendency and tanning ability.

F H Rampen1, B A Fleuren, T M de Boo, W A Lemmens.   

Abstract

Burning and tanning histories were studied in 790 white students 18 to 30 years of age by means of a self-administered questionnaire. Only 325 cases (41.1%) were classifiable according to the Fitzpatrick scheme (skin types I to IV). Skin type I (always burn, never tan) was recorded only twice (0.3%). The minimal erythemal dose was measured in a subgroup of 197 students; these results showed no significant correlation with the self-reported burning tendency. In 508 students the burning-tanning histories were compared with eye and hair color, freckling tendency, and number of moles. The tanning ability showed a better correlation with skin complexion characteristics than the burning tendency. It is concluded that self-reported burning-tanning histories form an unreliable means of skin typing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3377517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  15 in total

1.  Malignant melanoma: girding our loins again.

Authors:  G B Hill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Are the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes Valid for Cancer Risk Assessment in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of Women?

Authors:  Marilyn S Sommers; Jamison D Fargo; Yadira Regueira; Kathleen M Brown; Barbara L Beacham; Angela R Perfetti; Janine S Everett; David J Margolis
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Color bar tool for skin type self-identification: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Byron K Ho; June K Robinson
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 4.  Common cutaneous disorders in athletes.

Authors:  R J Conklin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The Skin We Live in: Pigmentation Traits and Tanning Behaviour in British Young Adults, an Observational and Genetically-Informed Study.

Authors:  Carolina Bonilla; Cilia Mejia-Lancheros
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.141

6.  Non-invasive diffuse reflectance measurements of cutaneous melanin content can predict human sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation.

Authors:  Sergio G Coelho; Barbara Z Zmudzka; Lanlan Yin; Sharon A Miller; Yuji Yamaguchi; Taketsugu Tadokoro; Vincent J Hearing; Janusz Z Beer
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 7.  Melanoma epidemiology and public health.

Authors:  Marianne Berwick; Esther Erdei; Jennifer Hay
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  The Feasibility and Acceptability of Using a Wearable UV Radiation Exposure Monitoring Device in Adults and Children: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Nagelhout; Riley Lensink; Angela Zhu; Bridget G Parsons; Jakob D Jensen; Yelena P Wu
Journal:  JMIR Dermatol       Date:  2020-04-29

9.  Using genetic proxies for lifecourse sun exposure to assess the causal relationship of sun exposure with circulating vitamin d and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Carolina Bonilla; Rebecca Gilbert; John P Kemp; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; William D Fraser; Smith George Davey; Sarah J Lewis; Mark Lathrop; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Assessment of a new questionnaire for self-reported sun sensitivity in an occupational skin cancer screening program.

Authors:  Jürgen Tacke; Jens Dietrich; Beatrix Steinebrunner; Antonius Reifferscheid
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2008-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.