Literature DB >> 33773297

Kinematic effects of a passive lift assistive exoskeleton.

Athulya A Simon1, Mohammad Mehdi Alemi2, Alan T Asbeck3.   

Abstract

The VT-Lowe's exoskeleton was designed to help support the back during repetitive lifting tasks. This study focused on the kinematic differences between lifting with and without the exoskeleton (With-Exo and Without-Exo) over three different lifting styles (Freestyle, Squat, and Stoop) and two different box weights (0% and 20% of bodyweight). Twelve young and healthy males (Age 23.5 +/- 4.42 years; Height 179.33 +/- 6.37 cm; Weight 80.4 +/- 5.59 kg) participated in this study. Variables analyzed include the ankle and knee angles and angle between the Shoulder-Hip-Knee (SHK); the shoulder, elbow, and wrist heights; and the lifting speed and acceleration. The relationships between the torso angle, SHK angle, center of mass of the torso, torso torque, box height, as well as electromyography (EMG) data from a related study were also analyzed. On average, wearing the exoskeleton resulted in a 1.5 degree increase in ankle dorsiflexion, a 2.6 degree decrease in knee flexion, and a decrease of 2.3 degrees in SHK angle. Subjects' shoulder, elbow, and wrist heights were slightly higher while wearing the exoskeleton, and they lifted slightly more slowly while wearing the exoskeleton. Subjects moved more quickly while bending down as compared to standing up, and with the 0% bodyweight box as compared to the 20% bodyweight box. The values for Freestyle lifts generally fell in between Squat and Stoop lift styles or were not significantly different from Squat. EMG data from the leg muscles had relationships with torso torque while the back and stomach muscles showed no significant relationships.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back exoskeleton; Kinematics; Lift assistive exoskeleton; Lifting; Passive exoskeleton

Year:  2021        PMID: 33773297     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  4 in total

1.  Using passive or active back-support exoskeletons during a repetitive lifting task: influence on cardiorespiratory parameters.

Authors:  M Schwartz; K Desbrosses; J Theurel; G Mornieux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Assessment of a Passive Lumbar Exoskeleton in Material Manual Handling Tasks under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Sofía Iranzo; Alicia Piedrabuena; Fernando García-Torres; Jose Luis Martinez-de-Juan; Gema Prats-Boluda; Mercedes Sanchis; Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.

Authors:  Ali Golabchi; Andrew Chao; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Biomechanical Analysis of Stoop and Free-Style Squat Lifting and Lowering with a Generic Back-Support Exoskeleton Model.

Authors:  Mark Tröster; Sarah Budde; Christophe Maufroy; Michael Skipper Andersen; John Rasmussen; Urs Schneider; Thomas Bauernhansl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.